Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FEAT: Symbolic link removed it #4957

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 29, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Samuelopez-ansys
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ansys-reviewer-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New features or code improvements label Jul 26, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.44%. Comparing base (139bd47) to head (726d114).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4957   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.43%   83.44%           
=======================================
  Files         120      120           
  Lines       54514    54514           
=======================================
+ Hits        45485    45489    +4     
+ Misses       9029     9025    -4     

Copy link
Collaborator

@SMoraisAnsys SMoraisAnsys left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, one less thing related to Iron Python !

@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys merged commit b0f022b into main Jul 29, 2024
46 checks passed
@Samuelopez-ansys Samuelopez-ansys deleted the feat/remove_symbolic_link branch July 29, 2024 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New features or code improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants