Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
route53: fix CAA record ordering for idempotency #46049
route53: fix CAA record ordering for idempotency #46049
Changes from all commits
7847da6
3073e60
51789b6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand what this changes, as line 621 just sorts the resource records again whether or not
need_to_sort_records
is true or not.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This changes the
rset
object itself; it's needed because the comparison is done in line 621 betweenrset
andwanted_rset
. All the other lines (i.e. putting stuff intorecord
) is done only forstate == 'get'
if I understand it correctly, and not used anywhere else (in particular, not for comparison).I kept the sorting in line 621 because that used to be done for all record types (but as I said, it is only used for
state == 'get'
); I could have only sorted again if it wasn't sorted here already, but I thought that would make it unnecessary complex.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I nearly wrote another comment about how I still don't understand but I got there while writing it :)