Rename domains to record dimension and array dimensions #194
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
3d4d1f3 to
9f217c6
Compare
cb79147 to
87f72a7
Compare
b4e635b to
1d7e796
Compare
Rename ArrayDomain into Array dimensions. Rename DatumDomain into Record dimension.
Add access pattern, target hardware info, exchangeable mapping and layout changing copies.
…to introduction page
* rename corresponding files * rename VirtualDatum to VirtualRecord * rename DatumCoord to RecordCoord * rename DatumStruct to Record * rename DatumElement to Field * rename lots of helper functions * rename variables containing datum * rename literal operator _DC into _RC * update images *
* Rename ArrayDomainRange to ArrayDimsIndexRange * Replace term domain by dimensions where appropriate * Update images
1d7e796 to
179e013
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After several internal discussions, we think renaming the datum domain into record dimension and array domain into array dimensions would increase clarity a lot. See also: #176