Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Beta Tester / VC campaign better treatment #7250

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bobbykolev
Copy link
Collaborator

@bobbykolev bobbykolev commented Nov 25, 2024

#7208
#7204

  • Beta badge/label indicator on user's avatar;
  • show user roles (some of them as defined in the story) in the user menu (not only Global Admin as currently);
  • the Campaign block on the home dashboard should be visible only to VC Campaign users (exclude beta testers);
    As part of the last one, we're now using PlatformRoles instead of agent.credentials (which is preferable).

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced localization with new user role definitions including "GLOBAL_ADMIN," "SUPPORT," "LICENSE_MANAGER," "VC_CAMPAIGN," and "BETA_TESTER."
    • Improved user role handling across various components, allowing for more detailed role information in the user interface.
    • Introduced a new BadgeLabel component for displaying role badges in the navigation.
    • Updated user avatar to conditionally show a badge for users with the "BetaTester" role.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected typographical error in the "community" section for the "invitationSent" message.
  • Refactor

    • Updated user context and role management logic to accommodate new platform roles and streamline role-checking mechanisms.
  • Style

    • Minor adjustments to comments and formatting for clarity in the user menu component.
    • Adjusted overflow behavior in the navigation bar to enhance content display.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to several files related to localization and user roles. A new section for user roles has been introduced in the translation.en.json file, along with corrections to existing strings. The UserProvider and related components have been updated to accommodate new data fields and types, specifically focusing on platform roles. The GraphQL schema has been enhanced to include new fields in the platform query, impacting various components that utilize this data.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json Added new "roles" section with definitions for various roles; corrected "invitationSent" string.
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx Updated UserContextValue interface to include platformRoles; modified default values and provided data.
src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql Added new fields id and myRoles to the platform query.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql Modified CampaignBlockCredentials query to include new platform field; removed agent field structure.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx Updated role types to PlatformRole; modified logic to derive userRoles from platform.myRoles.
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx Enhanced role handling to accommodate multiple platform roles; updated rendering logic for user roles.
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx Added role-based UI elements for BetaTester with BadgeLabel component; adjusted layout properties.
src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx Introduced new BadgeLabel component for displaying role badges with specific styling.
src/core/ui/navigation/NavigationBar.tsx Modified NavigationBarContent to allow overflow behavior of the navigation bar's content.

Possibly related issues

  • Beta tester/vc campaign indicators #7208: The changes in this PR enhance role management, which could help address the need for displaying user roles such as "Beta Tester" and "VC Campaign" in the user menu.

Possibly related PRs

  • Calendar events changes #6998: This PR modifies the translation.en.json file, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also updates this file by adding a new "roles" section and correcting a typographical error.
  • Invites with role #7025: This PR also updates the translation.en.json file, adding new strings related to community roles, which aligns with the role management enhancements introduced in the main PR.
  • Platform Banner extended to show terms and privacy #7092: This PR includes changes to the translation.en.json file, specifically related to user notifications and terms updates, which may relate to the overall context of user roles and management in the main PR.
  • [Simple Homepage] Create Space button  #7121: This PR adds a new entry in the translation.en.json file for creating a space, which is relevant to the role management and user interactions discussed in the main PR.
  • Adjust VC campaign text #7182: This PR updates the translation.en.json file, specifically enhancing clarity in community-related strings, which ties into the role management context of the main PR.
  • Confusion around pending memberships #7212: This PR modifies the translation.en.json file to clarify pending memberships, which relates to user roles and management discussed in the main PR.
  • fix my account rules #7218: This PR updates the ContributorAccountView.tsx file, which may relate to the role management context introduced in the main PR, as it involves account entitlements and user roles.
  • Homepage fixes #7224: This PR updates the translation.en.json file, enhancing various user interface elements, which aligns with the role management context of the main PR.
  • Fix - Your name is missing sometimes in the Dashboard's banner welcome message. #7235: This PR modifies the HomePageLayout.tsx file to ensure the user's name is displayed correctly, which is relevant to user roles and personalization discussed in the main PR.

Suggested labels

client, translations

Suggested reviewers

  • ccano

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@bobbykolev bobbykolev changed the title Client 7208 beta tester 1 Beta Tester / VC campaign better treatment Nov 25, 2024
@bobbykolev bobbykolev marked this pull request as draft November 25, 2024 10:38
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql (1)

3-4: Consider adding field descriptions

To improve schema documentation, consider adding descriptions for the new fields using GraphQL's description syntax.

 query PlatformLevelAuthorization {
   platform {
+    """
+    Unique identifier for the platform
+    """
     id
+    """
+    List of roles assigned to the current user on this platform
+    """
     myRoles
     authorization {
       ...MyPrivileges
     }
   }
 }
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx (1)

Line range hint 18-23: Consider adding debug logging for visibility checks

While the visibility logic is correct, adding debug logging when the component is not rendered would help with troubleshooting user access issues.

  if (
    !userRoles?.some(role => rolesAvailableTo.includes(role)) ||
    !userEntitlements?.some(entitlement => entitlementsAvailableTo.includes(entitlement))
  ) {
+   console.debug('CampaignBlock not rendered:', { userRoles, userEntitlements });
    return null;
  }
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (2)

50-50: Consider adding type annotation for platformRoles

While TypeScript can infer the type, explicitly typing platformRoles would improve code clarity and type safety.

-const { user: { user, hasPlatformPrivilege } = {}, isAuthenticated, platformRoles } = useUserContext();
+const { user: { user, hasPlatformPrivilege } = {}, isAuthenticated, platformRoles }: { platformRoles: PlatformRole[] } = useUserContext();

57-74: Enhance roles implementation readability and maintainability

While the implementation is functionally correct, consider these improvements:

  1. The comment about order should be more specific
  2. Consider reducing empty lines between role checks
  3. Consider extracting role mappings to a constant
-// the roles should follow the order
+// Roles are displayed in order of precedence: Global Admin > VC Campaign > Beta Tester
+const ROLE_TRANSLATIONS: Record<PlatformRole, string> = {
+  [PlatformRole.GlobalAdmin]: 'common.roles.GLOBAL_ADMIN',
+  [PlatformRole.VcCampaign]: 'common.roles.VC_CAMPAIGN',
+  [PlatformRole.BetaTester]: 'common.roles.BETA_TESTER',
+} as const;

 const roles = useMemo(() => {
-  const result: string[] = [];
-
-  if (platformRoles.includes(PlatformRole.GlobalAdmin)) {
-    result.push(t('common.roles.GLOBAL_ADMIN'));
-  }
-
-  if (platformRoles.includes(PlatformRole.VcCampaign)) {
-    result.push(t('common.roles.VC_CAMPAIGN'));
-  }
-
-  if (platformRoles.includes(PlatformRole.BetaTester)) {
-    result.push(t('common.roles.BETA_TESTER'));
-  }
-
-  return result.join(', ');
+  return Object.entries(ROLE_TRANSLATIONS)
+    .filter(([role]) => platformRoles.includes(role as PlatformRole))
+    .map(([_, translation]) => t(translation))
+    .join(', ');
 }, [platformRoles, t]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 14c64ed and 3a1c556.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.ts is excluded by !**/generated/**
  • src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.ts is excluded by !**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (2 hunks)
  • src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql (1 hunks)
  • src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql (1 hunks)
  • src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx (2 hunks)
  • src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (1)

Pattern src/**/*.json: Review the JSON files for correct syntax and structure.
Ensure that the configuration and data are accurate and follow the project's standards.
Check for sensitive data exposure and ensure that the data is properly validated.

src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.

src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.

src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql (1)

3-4: Verify schema types for new fields

The addition of id and myRoles fields aligns with the PR objectives for improved role management. However, let's verify the schema types are properly defined.

✅ Verification successful

Schema types are properly defined for platform fields

The id and myRoles fields in the Platform type are properly defined in the GraphQL schema:

  • id is implicitly typed as String (standard GraphQL ID scalar)
  • myRoles is typed as Array<PlatformRole> where PlatformRole is an enum with values like GLOBAL_ADMIN, COMMUNITY_READER, etc.

The schema types align with the usage in CampaignBlock and UserProvider components. No schema issues found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check schema definitions for platform type fields
# Expected: Find type definitions for platform.id and platform.myRoles

# Search for platform type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type Platform {
  $$$
}'

# Search for any enum or type definitions related to roles
ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 74278


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform type definition in GraphQL files
rg -t graphql "type Platform" -A 10

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform type definition in all files since GraphQL extension is not recognized
rg "type Platform" -A 10

# Also search for platform query definition
rg "platform.*{" -A 10

Length of output: 20258


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform query definition with fixed pattern
rg "platform \{" -A 10

# Also search for the specific GraphQL file content
fd -t f "PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql" -x cat {}

Length of output: 38940

src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql (2)

2-5: LGTM! Good transition to PlatformRoles

The switch from agent.credentials to platform.myRoles aligns with the project's preferred approach for role-based access control.


Line range hint 1-16: Verify role-based access control implementation

Please ensure that the combination of platform.myRoles and license.myLicensePrivileges is properly used to restrict Campaign block visibility to VC Campaign users while excluding beta testers.

✅ Verification successful

Role-based access control is properly implemented

The implementation correctly restricts Campaign block visibility to VC Campaign users through a dual-check mechanism:

  • Verifies user has the VcCampaign platform role
  • Confirms user has the AccountVirtualContributor license privilege

The component returns null (no rendering) if either check fails, effectively preventing access for unauthorized users including beta testers. The implementation in CampaignBlock.tsx shows clear and proper usage of the GraphQL query results.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the role-based access control implementation for the Campaign block

# Check for role-based conditionals in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = useQuery(CampaignBlockCredentials$$$)'

# Look for access control checks using platform roles
rg -A 5 'platform.*myRoles.*VC.*Campaign' src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/

# Check for beta tester exclusion logic
rg -A 5 'beta.*tester|BETA.*TESTER' src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/

Length of output: 245


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find the Campaign block component and its access control logic

# Find the Campaign block component file
fd "CampaignBlock" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/

# Search for role-based access checks in Campaign-related files
rg -l "myRoles|myLicensePrivileges" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/

# Look for the component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const CampaignBlock = $_ => {
  $$$
}'

# Search for any permission or role checking utilities
rg -l "hasRole|checkPermission|canAccess" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/

# Check for any constants defining roles or permissions
rg -l "ROLES|PERMISSIONS|VC_CAMPAIGN" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/

Length of output: 3590

src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx (2)

2-2: LGTM! Import changes align with platform roles migration

The switch to importing PlatformRole from the GraphQL schema aligns with the objective of using platform roles instead of agent credentials.


1-1: Verify GraphQL query implementation

Let's verify that the GraphQL query includes all necessary fields and is correctly typed.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for the specific GraphQL query definition for CampaignBlock.


GraphQL query implementation is correctly typed and complete

The CampaignBlockCredentials query is properly implemented with all necessary fields:

  • Fetches platform roles through myRoles
  • Retrieves license privileges via myLicensePrivileges
  • Includes all required IDs for proper type safety
  • These fields are used correctly in the component to check for VcCampaign role and AccountVirtualContributor entitlement
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the GraphQL query definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const CampaignBlockCredentials = gql`
  $$$
`'

# Search for any other usages of the same fields to ensure consistency
rg -A 5 'platform\.myRoles|myLicensePrivileges'

Length of output: 13217


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the GraphQL query in CampaignBlock files
cat src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql

Length of output: 286

src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (2)

9-14: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and properly typed.

The new imports from the GraphQL schema are correctly structured and include all necessary types for the enhanced user context.


25-25: Interface changes align with PR objectives.

The addition of platformRoles to both the interface and default context value is well-implemented. However, let's verify that all components consuming these new fields are properly updated.

Also applies to: 37-37

✅ Verification successful

Interface changes are correctly implemented and consumed

The verification shows that platformRoles is properly:

  • Defined in the UserProvider interface
  • Initialized with safe default values
  • Populated from platform authorization data
  • Only consumed in PlatformNavigationUserMenu where it's correctly used to display user roles
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find components that might need updates for the new platformRoles field
# Look for components accessing UserContext or using useUserContext hook

# Search for UserContext consumers
echo "Components using UserContext:"
rg -l "useContext.*UserContext|UserContext\.Consumer"

# Search for custom hook usage
echo -e "\nComponents using useUserContext:"
rg -l "useUserContext"

Length of output: 3826


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how platformRoles is being used in the components
echo "Components using platformRoles:"
rg -l "platformRoles"

# Get more context around platformRoles usage
echo -e "\nContext of platformRoles usage:"
rg -C 3 "platformRoles"

Length of output: 5115

src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (2)

19-19: LGTM: Import changes are well-structured

The addition of PlatformRole import alongside AuthorizationPrivilege maintains good code organization.


85-89: LGTM: Role rendering implementation is clean and follows UI guidelines

The implementation correctly handles the conditional display of roles with appropriate styling.

src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (2)

581-586: LGTM! New roles section added correctly.

The new roles section is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives to display additional user roles beyond Global Admin. The naming is consistent with the existing translation patterns.


595-595: LGTM! Fixed typo in invitationSent message.

Corrected the spelling of "successfully" in the invitation confirmation message.

@bobbykolev bobbykolev marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2024 14:11
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx (2)

5-8: Add JSDoc documentation for the interface and its properties

While the interface is well-structured, adding JSDoc documentation would improve code maintainability and developer experience.

+/**
+ * Props for the BadgeLabel component
+ * @extends {TypographyProps}
+ */
 interface BadgeLabelProps extends TypographyProps {
+  /** The text to display in the badge */
   count?: string;
+  /** The size variant of the badge */
   size?: 'small' | 'medium';
 }

10-22: Consider extracting shared styles and using theme-based values

Two suggestions for improvement:

  1. Since this is copied from BadgeCounter, consider creating a shared configuration to avoid duplication.
  2. Replace magic numbers with theme-based values for better consistency and maintainability.
+import { Theme } from '@mui/material';
+
+const getBadgeSizes = (theme: Theme): Record<NonNullable<BadgeLabelProps['size']>, TypographyProps> => ({
  small: {
-   fontSize: '0.7rem',
+   fontSize: theme.typography.pxToRem(11), // 0.7rem ≈ 11px
    lineHeight: gutters(0.8),
    width: 'auto',
    height: gutters(0.8),
  },
  medium: {
    width: 'auto',
    height: gutters(1),
  },
});
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx (1)

55-66: Consider using theme spacing for badge positioning

The badge implementation looks good, but consider using theme spacing utilities instead of magic numbers for better maintainability.

  <BadgeLabel
    count="Beta"
    size="small"
    sx={{
      position: 'absolute',
-     bottom: '-8px',
-     right: '-12px',
+     bottom: theme => theme.spacing(-1),
+     right: theme => theme.spacing(-1.5),
      zIndex: PLATFORM_NAVIGATION_MENU_Z_INDEX + 1,
    }}
  />
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (1)

57-75: Consider documenting role precedence behavior

The current implementation returns the first matching role, which means users with multiple roles will only see their highest priority role. While this might be intentional, it should be documented to prevent confusion.

Additionally, consider adding a comment explaining the role precedence order for future maintainability.

+// Role precedence order (highest to lowest):
+// 1. GlobalAdmin
+// 2. Support
+// 3. LicenseManager
+// 4. BetaTester
+// 5. VcCampaign
 const role = useMemo(() => {
   for (const platformRole of platformRoles) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a1c556 and df8b47a.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (2 hunks)
  • src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/core/ui/navigation/NavigationBar.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx (3 hunks)
  • src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
src/core/ui/navigation/NavigationBar.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx (1)

1-44: Verify integration with beta tester functionality

Let's ensure the component is properly integrated with the beta tester identification system as per PR objectives.

✅ Verification successful

BadgeLabel is correctly integrated with beta tester functionality

The component is properly integrated with the beta tester identification system:

  • It's used in PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx to display a "Beta" badge
  • The badge is conditionally rendered based on user authentication and the BetaTester platform role
  • Appropriate styling and positioning are applied for the badge display
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify BadgeLabel integration with beta tester functionality

# Check for beta tester related usage
echo "Checking BadgeLabel usage in beta tester context..."
rg -l "BadgeLabel.*beta" --type ts --type tsx

# Check for proper role-based conditional rendering
echo "Checking role-based conditional rendering..."
rg "BetaTester.*BadgeLabel" --type ts --type tsx -A 3

Length of output: 371


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify BadgeLabel integration with beta tester functionality

# Check for BadgeLabel usage
echo "Checking BadgeLabel usage..."
rg -l "BadgeLabel" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}'

# Check for beta tester related usage
echo "Checking beta tester related usage with BadgeLabel..."
rg "BadgeLabel.*beta|beta.*BadgeLabel" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -A 3

# Check for role-based conditional rendering
echo "Checking role-based conditional rendering..."
rg "BetaTester.*BadgeLabel|BadgeLabel.*BetaTester" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -A 3

Length of output: 660


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage in PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
echo "Checking BadgeLabel usage in PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx..."
cat src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx

# Let's also check for any beta or role-related code in this file
echo "Checking for beta/role related code in the same file..."
rg "beta|role|isBeta|userRole" src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx

Length of output: 3743

src/core/ui/navigation/NavigationBar.tsx (1)

28-28: LGTM! Necessary change for beta badge visibility.

The addition of overflow: 'visible' is appropriate for allowing the beta badge to render correctly on user avatars. This is a common pattern for badge implementations.

Please verify that:

  1. The beta badge renders correctly without being clipped
  2. The overflow doesn't cause any unintended layout issues with neighboring elements
✅ Verification successful

Overflow visibility change is consistent with platform navigation patterns

The change to set overflow: 'visible' in NavigationBar is aligned with existing implementations, particularly with the PlatformNavigationUserAvatar component which also uses overflow: 'visible' for similar navigation elements. This consistency in overflow handling across navigation components supports the proper display of badges and overlaying elements.

  • src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx already implements overflow="visible" for navigation items
  • Similar overflow visibility patterns are used in other components like DialogActionButtons and DashboardGenericSection where content needs to extend beyond bounds
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related badge styling to ensure consistent overflow handling
rg -t tsx -t ts "badge.*overflow|overflow.*badge" 

Length of output: 79


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for badge-related styling patterns in all files
rg "badge.*overflow|overflow.*badge"

# Search for badge-related components and their styling
ast-grep --pattern 'badge'

# Look for files containing both badge and overflow styling
rg -l "badge" | xargs rg "overflow"

Length of output: 99


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing 'badge' keyword
fd . -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg -l "badge"

# Search for the specific Paper component usage with overflow
ast-grep --pattern 'Paper sx={{ $$$, overflow: $_, $$$ }}'

# Look for other navigation-related components with overflow styling
fd . -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "overflow.*visible"

Length of output: 869

src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx (3)

12-13: LGTM: New imports are correctly added

The imports for BadgeLabel and PlatformRole are necessary for implementing the beta tester badge functionality.


35-35: LGTM: UI container changes support badge positioning

The overflow and position changes are necessary for proper badge rendering and positioning.

Also applies to: 42-42


22-22: Verify the platformRoles implementation in UserContext

The implementation looks good and aligns with the PR objectives. Let's verify the UserContext implementation to ensure it properly provides the platformRoles.

Also applies to: 26-26

✅ Verification successful

platformRoles is properly implemented in UserContext

The implementation is verified and correct:

  • platformRoles is properly typed as PlatformRole[] in the UserContextValue interface
  • The PlatformRole enum is well-defined with all necessary roles including BETA_TESTER
  • The value is correctly initialized from the platform authorization data: platformLevelAuthorizationData?.platform.myRoles
  • The context provides a safe fallback with empty array when data is not available
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify UserContext implementation of platformRoles
# Check if platformRoles is properly typed and implemented in the UserContext

# Search for UserContext type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface UserContextValue {
  $$$
  platformRoles: $_
  $$$
}'

# Search for platformRoles initialization
rg -A 5 'platformRoles.*=.*PlatformRole' 

Length of output: 1326


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation of platformRoles in UserProvider

# Check for platformRoles initialization in UserProvider
rg -A 10 'const.*platformRoles' src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/

# Check for PlatformRole enum definition
ast-grep --pattern 'enum PlatformRole {
  $$$
}'

# Check where platformRoles is being set
rg -A 5 'setPlatformRoles|platformRoles:.*\['

Length of output: 2729

src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (2)

18-18: LGTM: Import addition aligns with new role-based functionality

The addition of PlatformRole import is appropriate for the new role determination logic.


50-50: LGTM: Hook usage updated correctly

The addition of platformRoles to the useUserContext destructuring is well-implemented and necessary for the new role-based functionality.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (1)

25-25: LGTM: Interface update enables role-based feature control.

The addition of platformRoles to UserContextValue aligns with the PR objectives and enables proper type safety for role-based feature control.

This change provides a foundation for implementing role-based access control (RBAC) consistently across the application. Consider documenting the available platform roles and their implications in the README or documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df8b47a and 9b113d9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:

  • SQL Injection
  • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
  • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
  • Insecure dependencies
  • Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (4)

9-14: LGTM: Import changes align with new platform role requirements.

The new imports are properly structured and all imported types are utilized in the implementation.


37-37: LGTM: Safe default value for platform roles.

The empty array default is appropriate and type-safe.


85-87: LGTM: Safe access to platform roles with fallback.

The implementation safely handles undefined values using the null coalescing operator.


85-87: Verify the implementation of beta tester role handling.

The changes provide the foundation for beta tester identification, but let's verify the complete implementation.

✅ Verification successful

Beta tester role implementation is properly integrated

The implementation is complete and correctly handles beta tester role visibility:

  • Beta badge is conditionally rendered in PlatformNavigationUserAvatar based on the platformRoles array
  • Role label is properly translated in PlatformNavigationUserMenu
  • The platformRoles data from UserProvider is effectively utilized in the navigation components
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for beta tester role usage in components
echo "Searching for beta tester role usage..."
rg -l "BetaTester" 

# Search for role-based rendering in avatar/menu components
echo "Searching for role-based rendering in relevant components..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "Avatar|Menu" -x rg -l "platformRoles"

Length of output: 723


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation of beta tester role in navigation components
echo "Checking PlatformNavigationUserAvatar implementation..."
rg -A 5 "BetaTester" src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx

echo "\nChecking PlatformNavigationUserMenu implementation..."
rg -A 5 "BetaTester" src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx

# Check if platformRoles are properly used for conditional rendering
echo "\nChecking role-based conditional rendering..."
ast-grep --pattern 'platformRoles.includes($$$)'

Length of output: 1129

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants