-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Beta Tester / VC campaign better treatment #7250
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to several files related to localization and user roles. A new section for user roles has been introduced in the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql (1)
3-4
: Consider adding field descriptionsTo improve schema documentation, consider adding descriptions for the new fields using GraphQL's description syntax.
query PlatformLevelAuthorization { platform { + """ + Unique identifier for the platform + """ id + """ + List of roles assigned to the current user on this platform + """ myRoles authorization { ...MyPrivileges } } }src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx (1)
Line range hint
18-23
: Consider adding debug logging for visibility checksWhile the visibility logic is correct, adding debug logging when the component is not rendered would help with troubleshooting user access issues.
if ( !userRoles?.some(role => rolesAvailableTo.includes(role)) || !userEntitlements?.some(entitlement => entitlementsAvailableTo.includes(entitlement)) ) { + console.debug('CampaignBlock not rendered:', { userRoles, userEntitlements }); return null; }
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (2)
50-50
: Consider adding type annotation for platformRolesWhile TypeScript can infer the type, explicitly typing
platformRoles
would improve code clarity and type safety.-const { user: { user, hasPlatformPrivilege } = {}, isAuthenticated, platformRoles } = useUserContext(); +const { user: { user, hasPlatformPrivilege } = {}, isAuthenticated, platformRoles }: { platformRoles: PlatformRole[] } = useUserContext();
57-74
: Enhance roles implementation readability and maintainabilityWhile the implementation is functionally correct, consider these improvements:
- The comment about order should be more specific
- Consider reducing empty lines between role checks
- Consider extracting role mappings to a constant
-// the roles should follow the order +// Roles are displayed in order of precedence: Global Admin > VC Campaign > Beta Tester +const ROLE_TRANSLATIONS: Record<PlatformRole, string> = { + [PlatformRole.GlobalAdmin]: 'common.roles.GLOBAL_ADMIN', + [PlatformRole.VcCampaign]: 'common.roles.VC_CAMPAIGN', + [PlatformRole.BetaTester]: 'common.roles.BETA_TESTER', +} as const; const roles = useMemo(() => { - const result: string[] = []; - - if (platformRoles.includes(PlatformRole.GlobalAdmin)) { - result.push(t('common.roles.GLOBAL_ADMIN')); - } - - if (platformRoles.includes(PlatformRole.VcCampaign)) { - result.push(t('common.roles.VC_CAMPAIGN')); - } - - if (platformRoles.includes(PlatformRole.BetaTester)) { - result.push(t('common.roles.BETA_TESTER')); - } - - return result.join(', '); + return Object.entries(ROLE_TRANSLATIONS) + .filter(([role]) => platformRoles.includes(role as PlatformRole)) + .map(([_, translation]) => t(translation)) + .join(', '); }, [platformRoles, t]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.ts
is excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json
(2 hunks)src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx
(4 hunks)src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql
(1 hunks)src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql
(1 hunks)src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx
(2 hunks)src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx
(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (1)
Pattern src/**/*.json
: Review the JSON files for correct syntax and structure.
Ensure that the configuration and data are accurate and follow the project's standards.
Check for sensitive data exposure and ensure that the data is properly validated.
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}
: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/domain/platform/PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql (1)
3-4
: Verify schema types for new fields
The addition of id
and myRoles
fields aligns with the PR objectives for improved role management. However, let's verify the schema types are properly defined.
✅ Verification successful
Schema types are properly defined for platform fields
The id
and myRoles
fields in the Platform type are properly defined in the GraphQL schema:
id
is implicitly typed asString
(standard GraphQL ID scalar)myRoles
is typed asArray<PlatformRole>
where PlatformRole is an enum with values like GLOBAL_ADMIN, COMMUNITY_READER, etc.
The schema types align with the usage in CampaignBlock and UserProvider components. No schema issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check schema definitions for platform type fields
# Expected: Find type definitions for platform.id and platform.myRoles
# Search for platform type definition
ast-grep --pattern 'type Platform {
$$$
}'
# Search for any enum or type definitions related to roles
ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 74278
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform type definition in GraphQL files
rg -t graphql "type Platform" -A 10
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform type definition in all files since GraphQL extension is not recognized
rg "type Platform" -A 10
# Also search for platform query definition
rg "platform.*{" -A 10
Length of output: 20258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for platform query definition with fixed pattern
rg "platform \{" -A 10
# Also search for the specific GraphQL file content
fd -t f "PlatformLevelAuthorization.graphql" -x cat {}
Length of output: 38940
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql (2)
2-5
: LGTM! Good transition to PlatformRoles
The switch from agent.credentials
to platform.myRoles
aligns with the project's preferred approach for role-based access control.
Line range hint 1-16
: Verify role-based access control implementation
Please ensure that the combination of platform.myRoles
and license.myLicensePrivileges
is properly used to restrict Campaign block visibility to VC Campaign users while excluding beta testers.
✅ Verification successful
Role-based access control is properly implemented
The implementation correctly restricts Campaign block visibility to VC Campaign users through a dual-check mechanism:
- Verifies user has the
VcCampaign
platform role - Confirms user has the
AccountVirtualContributor
license privilege
The component returns null
(no rendering) if either check fails, effectively preventing access for unauthorized users including beta testers. The implementation in CampaignBlock.tsx
shows clear and proper usage of the GraphQL query results.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the role-based access control implementation for the Campaign block
# Check for role-based conditionals in the component
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = useQuery(CampaignBlockCredentials$$$)'
# Look for access control checks using platform roles
rg -A 5 'platform.*myRoles.*VC.*Campaign' src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/
# Check for beta tester exclusion logic
rg -A 5 'beta.*tester|BETA.*TESTER' src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/
Length of output: 245
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find the Campaign block component and its access control logic
# Find the Campaign block component file
fd "CampaignBlock" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/
# Search for role-based access checks in Campaign-related files
rg -l "myRoles|myLicensePrivileges" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/
# Look for the component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'const CampaignBlock = $_ => {
$$$
}'
# Search for any permission or role checking utilities
rg -l "hasRole|checkPermission|canAccess" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/
# Check for any constants defining roles or permissions
rg -l "ROLES|PERMISSIONS|VC_CAMPAIGN" src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/
Length of output: 3590
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.tsx (2)
2-2
: LGTM! Import changes align with platform roles migration
The switch to importing PlatformRole from the GraphQL schema aligns with the objective of using platform roles instead of agent credentials.
1-1
: Verify GraphQL query implementation
Let's verify that the GraphQL query includes all necessary fields and is correctly typed.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the specific GraphQL query definition for CampaignBlock.
GraphQL query implementation is correctly typed and complete
The CampaignBlockCredentials
query is properly implemented with all necessary fields:
- Fetches platform roles through
myRoles
- Retrieves license privileges via
myLicensePrivileges
- Includes all required IDs for proper type safety
- These fields are used correctly in the component to check for
VcCampaign
role andAccountVirtualContributor
entitlement
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the GraphQL query definition
ast-grep --pattern 'const CampaignBlockCredentials = gql`
$$$
`'
# Search for any other usages of the same fields to ensure consistency
rg -A 5 'platform\.myRoles|myLicensePrivileges'
Length of output: 13217
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the GraphQL query in CampaignBlock files
cat src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/Campaigns/CampaignBlock.graphql
Length of output: 286
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (2)
9-14
: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and properly typed.
The new imports from the GraphQL schema are correctly structured and include all necessary types for the enhanced user context.
25-25
: Interface changes align with PR objectives.
The addition of platformRoles
to both the interface and default context value is well-implemented. However, let's verify that all components consuming these new fields are properly updated.
Also applies to: 37-37
✅ Verification successful
Interface changes are correctly implemented and consumed
The verification shows that platformRoles
is properly:
- Defined in the UserProvider interface
- Initialized with safe default values
- Populated from platform authorization data
- Only consumed in PlatformNavigationUserMenu where it's correctly used to display user roles
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find components that might need updates for the new platformRoles field
# Look for components accessing UserContext or using useUserContext hook
# Search for UserContext consumers
echo "Components using UserContext:"
rg -l "useContext.*UserContext|UserContext\.Consumer"
# Search for custom hook usage
echo -e "\nComponents using useUserContext:"
rg -l "useUserContext"
Length of output: 3826
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how platformRoles is being used in the components
echo "Components using platformRoles:"
rg -l "platformRoles"
# Get more context around platformRoles usage
echo -e "\nContext of platformRoles usage:"
rg -C 3 "platformRoles"
Length of output: 5115
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (2)
19-19
: LGTM: Import changes are well-structured
The addition of PlatformRole
import alongside AuthorizationPrivilege
maintains good code organization.
85-89
: LGTM: Role rendering implementation is clean and follows UI guidelines
The implementation correctly handles the conditional display of roles with appropriate styling.
src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json (2)
581-586
: LGTM! New roles section added correctly.
The new roles section is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives to display additional user roles beyond Global Admin. The naming is consistent with the existing translation patterns.
595-595
: LGTM! Fixed typo in invitationSent message.
Corrected the spelling of "successfully" in the invitation confirmation message.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx (2)
5-8
: Add JSDoc documentation for the interface and its propertiesWhile the interface is well-structured, adding JSDoc documentation would improve code maintainability and developer experience.
+/** + * Props for the BadgeLabel component + * @extends {TypographyProps} + */ interface BadgeLabelProps extends TypographyProps { + /** The text to display in the badge */ count?: string; + /** The size variant of the badge */ size?: 'small' | 'medium'; }
10-22
: Consider extracting shared styles and using theme-based valuesTwo suggestions for improvement:
- Since this is copied from BadgeCounter, consider creating a shared configuration to avoid duplication.
- Replace magic numbers with theme-based values for better consistency and maintainability.
+import { Theme } from '@mui/material'; + +const getBadgeSizes = (theme: Theme): Record<NonNullable<BadgeLabelProps['size']>, TypographyProps> => ({ small: { - fontSize: '0.7rem', + fontSize: theme.typography.pxToRem(11), // 0.7rem ≈ 11px lineHeight: gutters(0.8), width: 'auto', height: gutters(0.8), }, medium: { width: 'auto', height: gutters(1), }, });src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx (1)
55-66
: Consider using theme spacing for badge positioningThe badge implementation looks good, but consider using theme spacing utilities instead of magic numbers for better maintainability.
<BadgeLabel count="Beta" size="small" sx={{ position: 'absolute', - bottom: '-8px', - right: '-12px', + bottom: theme => theme.spacing(-1), + right: theme => theme.spacing(-1.5), zIndex: PLATFORM_NAVIGATION_MENU_Z_INDEX + 1, }} />src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (1)
57-75
: Consider documenting role precedence behaviorThe current implementation returns the first matching role, which means users with multiple roles will only see their highest priority role. While this might be intentional, it should be documented to prevent confusion.
Additionally, consider adding a comment explaining the role precedence order for future maintainability.
+// Role precedence order (highest to lowest): +// 1. GlobalAdmin +// 2. Support +// 3. LicenseManager +// 4. BetaTester +// 5. VcCampaign const role = useMemo(() => { for (const platformRole of platformRoles) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json
(2 hunks)src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx
(1 hunks)src/core/ui/navigation/NavigationBar.tsx
(1 hunks)src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
(3 hunks)src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx
(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/core/i18n/en/translation.en.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/core/ui/navigation/NavigationBar.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/core/ui/icon/BadgeLabel.tsx (1)
1-44
: Verify integration with beta tester functionality
Let's ensure the component is properly integrated with the beta tester identification system as per PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
BadgeLabel is correctly integrated with beta tester functionality
The component is properly integrated with the beta tester identification system:
- It's used in
PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
to display a "Beta" badge - The badge is conditionally rendered based on user authentication and the BetaTester platform role
- Appropriate styling and positioning are applied for the badge display
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify BadgeLabel integration with beta tester functionality
# Check for beta tester related usage
echo "Checking BadgeLabel usage in beta tester context..."
rg -l "BadgeLabel.*beta" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for proper role-based conditional rendering
echo "Checking role-based conditional rendering..."
rg "BetaTester.*BadgeLabel" --type ts --type tsx -A 3
Length of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify BadgeLabel integration with beta tester functionality
# Check for BadgeLabel usage
echo "Checking BadgeLabel usage..."
rg -l "BadgeLabel" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}'
# Check for beta tester related usage
echo "Checking beta tester related usage with BadgeLabel..."
rg "BadgeLabel.*beta|beta.*BadgeLabel" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -A 3
# Check for role-based conditional rendering
echo "Checking role-based conditional rendering..."
rg "BetaTester.*BadgeLabel|BadgeLabel.*BetaTester" --type typescript --type-add 'typescript:*.{ts,tsx}' -A 3
Length of output: 660
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage in PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
echo "Checking BadgeLabel usage in PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx..."
cat src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
# Let's also check for any beta or role-related code in this file
echo "Checking for beta/role related code in the same file..."
rg "beta|role|isBeta|userRole" src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
Length of output: 3743
src/core/ui/navigation/NavigationBar.tsx (1)
28-28
: LGTM! Necessary change for beta badge visibility.
The addition of overflow: 'visible'
is appropriate for allowing the beta badge to render correctly on user avatars. This is a common pattern for badge implementations.
Please verify that:
- The beta badge renders correctly without being clipped
- The overflow doesn't cause any unintended layout issues with neighboring elements
✅ Verification successful
Overflow visibility change is consistent with platform navigation patterns
The change to set overflow: 'visible'
in NavigationBar is aligned with existing implementations, particularly with the PlatformNavigationUserAvatar component which also uses overflow: 'visible'
for similar navigation elements. This consistency in overflow handling across navigation components supports the proper display of badges and overlaying elements.
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
already implementsoverflow="visible"
for navigation items- Similar overflow visibility patterns are used in other components like DialogActionButtons and DashboardGenericSection where content needs to extend beyond bounds
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related badge styling to ensure consistent overflow handling
rg -t tsx -t ts "badge.*overflow|overflow.*badge"
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for badge-related styling patterns in all files
rg "badge.*overflow|overflow.*badge"
# Search for badge-related components and their styling
ast-grep --pattern 'badge'
# Look for files containing both badge and overflow styling
rg -l "badge" | xargs rg "overflow"
Length of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing 'badge' keyword
fd . -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg -l "badge"
# Search for the specific Paper component usage with overflow
ast-grep --pattern 'Paper sx={{ $$$, overflow: $_, $$$ }}'
# Look for other navigation-related components with overflow styling
fd . -e ts -e tsx -e js -e jsx | xargs rg "overflow.*visible"
Length of output: 869
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx (3)
12-13
: LGTM: New imports are correctly added
The imports for BadgeLabel and PlatformRole are necessary for implementing the beta tester badge functionality.
35-35
: LGTM: UI container changes support badge positioning
The overflow and position changes are necessary for proper badge rendering and positioning.
Also applies to: 42-42
22-22
: Verify the platformRoles implementation in UserContext
The implementation looks good and aligns with the PR objectives. Let's verify the UserContext implementation to ensure it properly provides the platformRoles.
Also applies to: 26-26
✅ Verification successful
platformRoles is properly implemented in UserContext
The implementation is verified and correct:
platformRoles
is properly typed asPlatformRole[]
in the UserContextValue interface- The PlatformRole enum is well-defined with all necessary roles including BETA_TESTER
- The value is correctly initialized from the platform authorization data:
platformLevelAuthorizationData?.platform.myRoles
- The context provides a safe fallback with empty array when data is not available
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify UserContext implementation of platformRoles
# Check if platformRoles is properly typed and implemented in the UserContext
# Search for UserContext type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface UserContextValue {
$$$
platformRoles: $_
$$$
}'
# Search for platformRoles initialization
rg -A 5 'platformRoles.*=.*PlatformRole'
Length of output: 1326
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation of platformRoles in UserProvider
# Check for platformRoles initialization in UserProvider
rg -A 10 'const.*platformRoles' src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/
# Check for PlatformRole enum definition
ast-grep --pattern 'enum PlatformRole {
$$$
}'
# Check where platformRoles is being set
rg -A 5 'setPlatformRoles|platformRoles:.*\['
Length of output: 2729
src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx (2)
18-18
: LGTM: Import addition aligns with new role-based functionality
The addition of PlatformRole
import is appropriate for the new role determination logic.
50-50
: LGTM: Hook usage updated correctly
The addition of platformRoles
to the useUserContext destructuring is well-implemented and necessary for the new role-based functionality.
…io/client-web into client-7208-beta-tester-1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (1)
25-25
: LGTM: Interface update enables role-based feature control.The addition of
platformRoles
toUserContextValue
aligns with the PR objectives and enables proper type safety for role-based feature control.This change provides a foundation for implementing role-based access control (RBAC) consistently across the application. Consider documenting the available platform roles and their implications in the README or documentation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx
(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/domain/community/user/providers/UserProvider/UserProvider.tsx (4)
9-14
: LGTM: Import changes align with new platform role requirements.
The new imports are properly structured and all imported types are utilized in the implementation.
37-37
: LGTM: Safe default value for platform roles.
The empty array default is appropriate and type-safe.
85-87
: LGTM: Safe access to platform roles with fallback.
The implementation safely handles undefined values using the null coalescing operator.
85-87
: Verify the implementation of beta tester role handling.
The changes provide the foundation for beta tester identification, but let's verify the complete implementation.
✅ Verification successful
Beta tester role implementation is properly integrated
The implementation is complete and correctly handles beta tester role visibility:
- Beta badge is conditionally rendered in
PlatformNavigationUserAvatar
based on theplatformRoles
array - Role label is properly translated in
PlatformNavigationUserMenu
- The
platformRoles
data fromUserProvider
is effectively utilized in the navigation components
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for beta tester role usage in components
echo "Searching for beta tester role usage..."
rg -l "BetaTester"
# Search for role-based rendering in avatar/menu components
echo "Searching for role-based rendering in relevant components..."
fd -e tsx -e ts "Avatar|Menu" -x rg -l "platformRoles"
Length of output: 723
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation of beta tester role in navigation components
echo "Checking PlatformNavigationUserAvatar implementation..."
rg -A 5 "BetaTester" src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserAvatar.tsx
echo "\nChecking PlatformNavigationUserMenu implementation..."
rg -A 5 "BetaTester" src/main/ui/platformNavigation/PlatformNavigationUserMenu.tsx
# Check if platformRoles are properly used for conditional rendering
echo "\nChecking role-based conditional rendering..."
ast-grep --pattern 'platformRoles.includes($$$)'
Length of output: 1129
#7208
#7204
As part of the last one, we're now using PlatformRoles instead of agent.credentials (which is preferable).
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
BadgeLabel
component for displaying role badges in the navigation.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Style