IsPrivate Icon adjustements and usage on ExploreSpaces #7173
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpaces.graphql (1)
44-44: Document the possible values for privacy modeConsider adding an enum or documentation for the possible values of the
modefield to improve schema maintainability and developer experience.Example documentation:
""" @enum {SpacePrivacyMode} Possible values: - PUBLIC: Space visible to all users - PRIVATE: Space visible only to members """src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/PrivacyIcon.tsx (4)
6-11: Add JSDoc comments to document the props interface.While the type definition is clear, adding documentation would help other developers understand the expected units and constraints for each prop.
Consider adding JSDoc comments like this:
+/** + * Props for the PrivacyIcon component + * @property {number} [size=8] - Size of the icon container in theme spacing units + * @property {number} [top=8] - Top position in theme spacing units + * @property {number} [right=8] - Right position in theme spacing units + * @property {string} [ariaLabel='Private journey'] - Accessibility label for screen readers + */ type PrivacyIconProps = { size?: number; top?: number; right?: number; ariaLabel?: string; };
13-13: Consider using more descriptive prop names.The division by 10 in the spacing calculations suggests these values are in different units than expected. Consider renaming the props to be more explicit about the units.
-export const PrivacyIcon = memo(({ top = 8, size = 8, right = 8, ariaLabel = 'Private journey' }: PrivacyIconProps) => { +export const PrivacyIcon = memo(({ + topSpacing = 0.8, + sizeInPixels = 8, + rightSpacing = 0.8, + ariaLabel = 'Private journey' +}: PrivacyIconProps) => {
27-28: Apply theme spacing to size prop for consistency.While positioning uses theme spacing, the size is used directly. Consider using theme spacing for size as well to maintain consistency with the Material-UI system.
- width: size, - height: size, + width: theme.spacing(size / 10), + height: theme.spacing(size / 10),
32-32: Consider using theme alpha values for opacity.The hardcoded opacity value could be replaced with a theme-based value for better consistency across the application.
- opacity: 0.8, + opacity: theme.palette.action.disabledOpacity,src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpacesTypes.ts (1)
33-37: Consider extracting privacy settings type for reusability.The settings structure looks good, but since privacy settings might be reused across different interfaces, consider extracting it into a separate type.
+interface PrivacySettings { + privacy?: { + mode: SpacePrivacyMode; + }; +} interface ParentSpace extends Identifiable { profile: { displayName: string; avatar?: Visual; cardBanner?: Visual; }; - settings: { - privacy?: { - mode: SpacePrivacyMode; - }; - }; + settings: PrivacySettings; }src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/JourneyTile.tsx (2)
Line range hint
49-49: Add aria-label for better accessibility.The PrivacyIcon should have an aria-label to improve accessibility for screen readers.
- {isPrivate && <PrivacyIcon />} + {isPrivate && <PrivacyIcon aria-label="Private journey" />}
Line range hint
76-84: Consider cross-browser compatibility for backdrop-filter.The blur effect using
backdrop-filtermight not work in all browsers. Consider adding a fallback style or checking browser support.backgroundColor: theme => alpha(theme.palette.background.paper, 0.7), opacity: 1, transition: 'opacity 200ms', - backdropFilter: 'blur(10px)', + '@supports (backdrop-filter: blur(10px))': { + backdropFilter: 'blur(10px)', + }, + '@supports not (backdrop-filter: blur(10px))': { + backgroundColor: theme => alpha(theme.palette.background.paper, 0.9), + }, borderRadius: theme => ` 0 0 ${theme.shape.borderRadius}px ${theme.shape.borderRadius}px`,src/domain/journey/common/JourneyCard/JourneyCard.tsx (2)
Line range hint
19-19: Consider implementing the suggested TODO improvement.The TODO comment suggests passing
ComponentType<CardTags>instead of a boolean formatchedTerms. This would provide more flexibility and better type safety.Would you like me to help implement this improvement or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
39-106: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibility.The component implementation is clean and well-structured. The removal of privacy-related code was done properly with no leftover references. However, consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility, especially for the expandable section.
Here's a suggested improvement for the expandable section:
<Box onClick={canBeExpanded ? toggleExpanded : undefined} sx={{ cursor: 'pointer' }} paddingBottom={1} + role="button" + aria-expanded={isExpanded} + aria-controls="journey-card-content" > - <CardContent flexGrow={1}>{children}</CardContent> + <CardContent id="journey-card-content" flexGrow={1}>{children}</CardContent>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
src/core/apollo/generated/apollo-hooks.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**src/core/apollo/generated/graphql-schema.tsis excluded by!**/generated/**
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyCard/JourneyCard.tsx(1 hunks)src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/JourneyTile.tsx(1 hunks)src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/PrivacyIcon.tsx(1 hunks)src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpaces.graphql(1 hunks)src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpacesTypes.ts(2 hunks)src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpacesView.tsx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyCard/JourneyCard.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/JourneyTile.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/PrivacyIcon.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpaces.graphql (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{graphql,gql}: Review the GraphQL schema and queries for best practices, potential bugs, and adherence to the project's GraphQL standards.
Ensure that the schema is well-defined and queries are optimized.
Check for security vulnerabilities.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpacesTypes.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpacesView.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpaces.graphql (1)
42-46: Verify privacy information exposure to unauthenticated users
The schema changes look good and follow GraphQL best practices. However, since this information is used for unauthenticated users, let's verify that we're not exposing sensitive privacy information.
✅ Verification successful
Privacy mode exposure is safe and follows platform authorization patterns
The privacy mode information is safe to expose in the ExploreSpaces fragment because:
- The
SpacePrivacyModeenum only contains basic PUBLIC/PRIVATE values without sensitive details - The codebase shows extensive authorization checks throughout the platform with multiple auth guards and middleware
- Privacy mode is used in UI components to display visibility status, which is a common pattern for space discovery features
- The implementation follows the same pattern as other public-facing space information
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any access controls or auth checks for the privacy mode
# Look for auth-related code around the privacy mode usage
# Check for auth guards or conditions around privacy mode
rg -A 5 -B 5 "privacy.mode"
# Look for GraphQL resolvers handling this field
fd -e ts -e js -x rg -l "privacy.*mode.*resolve"
Length of output: 5271
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for privacy mode enum definition and its usage in authorization contexts
# Look for the SpacePrivacyMode enum
ast-grep --pattern 'enum SpacePrivacyMode {
$$$
}'
# Check for any authorization middleware or guards
rg -l "authorization|authenticate|isAuthenticated|requireAuth" --type ts
# Check for GraphQL schema definitions related to privacy
fd -e graphql -x rg -l "type.*Space.*Settings|type.*Privacy"
Length of output: 8503
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/PrivacyIcon.tsx (2)
1-4: LGTM! Well-organized imports with clear separation.
The imports are properly organized and include only the necessary dependencies.
19-19: Verify zIndex usage in the component hierarchy.
Using theme.zIndex.fab might need verification to ensure it doesn't conflict with other floating elements in the application.
✅ Verification successful
Usage of zIndex.fab is appropriate in this context
The zIndex.fab usage in PrivacyIcon is correct and doesn't pose any conflicts because:
- It's the only instance of
zIndex.fabin the codebase - The PrivacyIcon is rendered as an absolute positioned overlay on JourneyTile
- The component hierarchy shows the icon needs to be above the tile content but doesn't interfere with any other floating elements
- The Material-UI
theme.zIndex.fabis specifically designed for floating action elements like this privacy indicator
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other uses of zIndex.fab to verify potential conflicts
rg -A 2 "zIndex.fab" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for zIndex.fab usage with correct file type patterns
rg -A 2 "zIndex\.fab" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts"
# Also search for any zIndex usage in the same component or related components
rg -A 2 "zIndex" src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/ -g "*.tsx" -g "*.ts"
# Look for other components that might be rendered alongside PrivacyIcon
fd -e tsx -e ts . src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 4920
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpacesTypes.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM!
Clean import of the SpacePrivacyMode type from the GraphQL schema.
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/JourneyTile.tsx (2)
14-14: LGTM! Good separation of concerns.
Moving the PrivacyIcon to its own file improves modularity and follows the single responsibility principle.
Line range hint 16-31: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions.
The props interface is well-typed with proper optional flags and undefined handling for the journey prop.
src/domain/journey/common/JourneyCard/JourneyCard.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Import cleanup looks good.
The imports have been properly cleaned up, removing unused dependencies after the removal of the PrivacyIcon component.
src/main/topLevelPages/myDashboard/ExploreSpaces/ExploreSpacesView.tsx (2)
15-15: LGTM!
The import statement is correctly placed and properly utilized in the code.
127-133: LGTM! Verify JourneyTile's handling of isPrivate prop.
The implementation looks good and aligns with the PR objectives.
Let's verify that the JourneyTile component properly handles the isPrivate prop:
✅ Verification successful
JourneyTile properly implements the isPrivate prop
The component correctly handles the isPrivate prop by:
- Including it in the JourneyTileProps type definition
- Conditionally rendering the PrivacyIcon component when isPrivate is true
- Using proper TypeScript typing and default values
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check JourneyTile's implementation of isPrivate prop
# Find JourneyTile component definition and its props interface
ast-grep --pattern 'interface JourneyTileProps {
$$$
isPrivate?: $_
$$$
}'
# Check for isPrivate prop usage in JourneyTile component
ast-grep --pattern 'const JourneyTile = ({ isPrivate, $$$ }: JourneyTileProps) => {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 177
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the JourneyTile component file first
fd JourneyTile
# Then let's search for isPrivate prop usage with ripgrep for broader context
rg "isPrivate.*JourneyTile" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 1137
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how isPrivate is used within the JourneyTile component
cat src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/JourneyTile.tsx
# Also check for the interface definition
rg "interface JourneyTileProps" -A 10 src/domain/journey/common/JourneyTile/JourneyTile.tsx
Length of output: 3317
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bobbykolev Looks great! Just informational - I think we don't need explicit :boolean return value on the isPrivate() helper method since TS is apllying it automatically :)
->
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
PrivacyIconcomponent for visual representation of privacy settings.JourneyTileto include a privacy status check for spaces.Improvements
JourneyCardby removing privacy-related features.Bug Fixes