chore(clients): use the ruff python formatter

[millotp]

🧭 What and Why

The ruff formatter is blazingly fast and reduces the number of deps for python.

[algolia-bot]

✗ The generated branch has been deleted.

If the PR has been merged, you can check the generated code on the main branch.
You can still access the code generated on main via this commit.

[github-actions]

🚀 Deployed on https://66728b80b8e00cd7a698636f--api-clients-automation.netlify.app

[shortcuts]

Can we keep the previous ternary syntax? It was more readable

Other than that, looks really great!

[millotp]

Can we keep the previous ternary syntax? It was more readable

I tried too but it's not supported yet, there is a feature request astral-sh/ruff#9722

[millotp]

wdyt about the and syntax ? I could replace:

Outliers.from_dict(obj.get("outliers")) if obj.get("outliers") is not None else None     

with

obj.get("outliers") and Outliers.from_dict(obj.get("outliers"))   

[shortcuts]

wdyt about the and syntax ? I could replace:

Outliers.from_dict(obj.get("outliers")) if obj.get("outliers") is not None else None     

with

obj.get("outliers") and Outliers.from_dict(obj.get("outliers"))   

explicit* None seems better though :/ I guess we can wait for them to support it

Have you tried adding parentheses around the ternaries in the template, just to see if it's correctly indented?

[millotp]

Have you tried adding parentheses around the ternaries in the template, just to see if it's correctly indented?

Indeed that works perfectly !

[shortcuts]

Niceee