-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug: Float search is influenced by Decimal / Hexidecimal / Octal / Binary radio button #191
Labels
Comments
Update, no need to provide a config. If you search for a byte with the radio button set to Hexadecimal and then switch back to float, it is affecting the search feature. |
dreamsyntax
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2025
Resolves #191 Previously set value while viewing binary/word etc would influence scan. I verified unaligned option also works, though makes scanning take longer.
dreamsyntax
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 26, 2025
Resolves #191 Previously set value while viewing binary/word etc would influence scan. I verified unaligned option also works, though makes scanning take longer.
Opting to just enable these views for float and double. I see no reason to restrict them. |
This is now released in v1.2.6 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I recently switched to the latest Dolphin Memory Engine after using an older version for an unspecified period of time, and one thing I really don't like is how the scanner only uses hex when scanning for floats. For instance, if I wanted to search for 2.5, I'd have to convert it into hex (2.5 in hex is 40200000) and search for that. Because if you use a decimal value when scanning, it'll think you're using hexadecimal integers (using 2.5 as an example again, putting in 2.5 will make it think you're looking for 2). This forces you to constantly convert your floats into hex whenever you want to search for a float, which I find rather unintuitive.
I don't know whether or not it's a regression, or if it's intentional. Though regardless, I'd like to suggest/request the same toggle that's used when searching for bytes also be integrated when scanning for floats (the one that lets you choose between hexadecimal, decimal, octal, or binary). Because I'm sure there's some use cases for searching floats with hexadecimal values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: