-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Skip validation when previous state is empty due to reset #20585
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0160775
Skip validation when previous state is empty due to reset
jdpgrailsdev 733b4ad
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev b61d07d
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev b7a0f69
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev a3cfe75
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev a68294e
Handle null state object
jdpgrailsdev b2b28bc
Fix formatting
jdpgrailsdev 49101d3
Fix logic
jdpgrailsdev 32818b4
Fix method name
jdpgrailsdev fb4a05a
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev 4a5dd2a
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev 31abec2
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev 20ae9ab
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev e756a4b
Merge branch 'master' into jonathan/persist-empty-state
jdpgrailsdev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we bypass strict stubbing? Do we need those mock?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@benmoriceau I am not sure why this test has to do this. It is already creating lenient mocks and I originally attempted to not do that, but the tests fail without marking them lenient. In particular, these mocks are necessary, as we want to test the case where the previous state returned by the call to the state API returns a legacy state with an empty state JSON object for the data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, let's not address that in this PR