-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support eslint-plugin-react-hooks@2 #2090
Conversation
@perrin4869 Hi! I don't suppose you could rebase on |
@edmorley just rebased! no problems there |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@perrin4869 Thank you for the rebase! Travis is failing at the moment, but I believe should succeed after the change below? :-)
- node_js: "6" | ||
env: TEST=true ESLINT=5 PACKAGE=eslint-config-airbnb-base | ||
- node_js: "6" | ||
env: TEST=true ESLINT=5 PACKAGE=eslint-config-airbnb | ||
- node_js: "6" | ||
env: TEST=true ESLINT=5 REACT_HOOKS=1.7 PACKAGE=eslint-config-airbnb | ||
exclude: | ||
allow_failures: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the two new PREPUBLISH
entries under include
need equivalent entries under allow_failures
here (since currently those runs are failing). eg:
- env: PREPUBLISH=true ESLINT=6 REACT_HOOKS=1.7 PACKAGE=eslint-config-airbnb
- env: PREPUBLISH=true ESLINT=5 REACT_HOOKS=1.7 PACKAGE=eslint-config-airbnb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They don't; they're failing by design on master since new eslint rules have been released that haven't yet been added to the config. I'll rebase your PR after I've fixed it, you don't have to worry about it.
Hello, happy Monday! what's the status of this PR? Anything I can do to help drive it forward? |
Since #2083 was closed, I followed up, according to the changes requested there