Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix a problem with the addressrange example in memorymap #9639

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024
Merged

fix a problem with the addressrange example in memorymap #9639

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion shared-bindings/memorymap/AddressRange.c
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
//| # Pad control register is updated using an MP-safe atomic XOR
//| pad_ctrl ^= (d << 4)
//| pad_ctrl &= 0x00000030
//| pads_bank0[p*4+0x3004:p*4+0x3008] = pad_ctrl.to_bytes(4, "little")
//| pads_bank0[p*4+0x1004:p*4+0x1008] = pad_ctrl.to_bytes(4, "little")
//|
//| def rp2040_get_pad_drive(p):
//| pads_bank0 = memorymap.AddressRange(start=0x4001C000, length=0x4000)
Expand All @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@
//|
//| # print GPIO16 pad drive strength
//| print(rp2040_get_pad_drive(16))
//|
//| Note that the above example does **not** work on RP2350 because base
//| address and organization of the "pads0" registers changed compared
//| to the RP2040.
//| """
//|

Expand Down