Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've never passed arguments to invokeCommand before, but it seems like you would want to do it like this, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That would end up with the vm method getting an array with two numerically indexed values, but it expects an associative array with one value where the key is 'no-boot'.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess that makes sense as such. But if
no-boot
requires a value, wouldn't it beTRUE
or something? Why--yes
?I get why you'd want
no-boot
and--yes
as separate options, I guess I just don't understand how there's a key->value relationship between them.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/shrug I made the change that allowed minimal modification to make the thing work as expected. I can't speak to the initial rational for why it was written as it is.
But what we have is a method that expects a $options parameter and checks the value of the 'no-boot' key within that $options array
I'm not averse to refactoring it to take inputs differently but it isn't currently so janky that it offends, so I'm inclined to put refactoring it in the 'someday' column and deal with bigger issues first.