-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DJC: Provide new command option on Product to "Improve Packages from latest data" #45
Comments
Given our recent experience with importing real-world SBOMs into DejaCode with rather scant license information, I think we should raise the priority on this one. |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
@tdruez when I click on the notification generated by the "Improve..." process, it takes me to the Product (good) but it is not marking the notification as Read, and it continues to show up in the list. The basic functionality of the "Improve..." process appears to be working fine, although I am still testing that. |
@tdruez if possible, it might be better that when I click on the notification, it would open the Product positioned on the History tab rather than the Essentials tab. |
Let's expand this enhancement to include checking the DejaCode Package definitions for updates since a Package was initially assigned to a Product; this can be especially useful if the Package was scanned after it was assigned to the Product, such as from the "Scan all Packages" action. The primary field of interest here would be the license_expression on the Product Package, so that if that field is empty it would be eligible for refreshing from an updated Package. |
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
#45 Signed-off-by: tdruez <tdruez@nexb.com>
@DennisClark The #135 PR has been refined, merged, and deployed. |
@tdruez The logging of the Improve action on the Imports tab looks good, thanks. I think we can close this one. |
Importing an SBOM into a DejaCode Product can be disappointing if the SBOM does not have much license information. A nice feature would be to provide a new command option to "Improve Packages from PurlDB" on the Product "Scan" dropdown:
Step through the Product Packages
Use the PURL to find an entry in the PurlDB
Apply PurlDB field values to empty fields in the Product Package and corresponding Package definitions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: