Trying to compile MotoROS2 to DX200 target

[Julien44270]

Hi,

I'm following the above page.
Here is the result that I obtain.

MpBuilder is well set up :

If any mistakes could be reported or evolution would be raised to help to understand, I follow.

Julien

[gavanderhoorn]

To get it out of the way: DX200 is not yet officially supported. See the top of the main README.

We haven't yet merged #49, so the easy way out for us would be to say: "please wait a bit for official DX200 support".

However, I believe @ted-miller has successfully built #49 using mpBuilder.

Could you please clarify what exactly you have done, which files you've downloaded, which branches you've checked out, how you've setup everything, etc?

[Julien44270]

I forked this one that I put on a dedicated workspace on my computer for working.
I put the corresponding library, following the described structure.
A SDK DN key is well connected to the computer that I used to realize the compilation.

I will meet the above information to go on with, and I'll come back with other data.

[ted-miller]

I'm pretty sure this error is caused by the version of MotoPlus SDK. The structure of this project required updates to the SDK itself. MotoROS2 requires v1.5.1 or greater of MotoPlus SDK.

ccs@yaskawa.eu should be able to provide you an update that includes the license libraries for your region. If there's any issues, let us know.

[Julien44270]

I've just upgraded the DX200 controller (from 2.xxx to 3.xxx).
I'm blocking about transfering the yaml config file necessary for the deployment.
The support indicates that a lack of memory or the size of the file (too big) could be an issue...
Would you know if a memory extension (like SRAM) could solve it?

[gavanderhoorn]

If you're referring to the steps in the documentation where it asks you to save the .yaml on the SRAM drive as a user defined file: that's not used on DX200.

Place the .yaml on a USB stick (FAT32 formatted) and insert it into CN106. Then reboot.

(I'd like to reiterate we don't officially yet support DX200. This is one of those areas where the documentation still needs to be updated/clarified more)

[gavanderhoorn]

@Julien44270: just wanted to let you know we've just released 0.1.1, which includes support for DX200 controllers. See the releases.

You also don't need to build it from source any more, as we've included DX200 binaries in this release.