Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kubernetes HealthChecks Operator #418

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Mar 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

CarlosLanderas
Copy link
Contributor

@CarlosLanderas CarlosLanderas commented Feb 13, 2020

Version 3.0.0-beta.1 of the new Kubernetes Healthchecks Operator, targetting netcoreapp3.0

  • Pending documentation

Features:

  • [✓] New Custom resource definition (HealthChecks) (Might change in final version)

  • [✓] Automatic UI image deployment / removal and service deployment / removal when creating or removing healthcheck crds.

  • [✓] Automatic service discovery, removal and updates using a push model instead of the current UI
    pull model. The operator will listen to configured labels in CRD definition and this can be overriden
    with labels configured in services.

  • [✓] Automatic UI push endpoint exposure protected by an api key stored and created as a secret by kubernetes operator

Notes:

  • The UI Collector has been updated to support updated paths and schemes and reflect the execution histories properly. This was not supported before and now it can be updated by the operator

  • The push endpoint can only be enabled by setting the proper configuration and the api key secret is only known by the operator that retrieves the value from a namespaced secret

@CarlosLanderas
Copy link
Contributor Author

CarlosLanderas commented Mar 11, 2020

@ggmaresca , thanks for the review. Let's me address the changes

@CarlosLanderas CarlosLanderas merged commit 753d1ae into master Mar 11, 2020
@unaizorrilla unaizorrilla deleted the healthchecks-k8s-operator branch November 22, 2020 16:20
@sungam3r sungam3r mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants