-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author, Author Bio, Author Name: Add a fallback for Author Archive Template #55451
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fa2bad5
Author, Author Bio, Author Name: Add a fallback for Author Archive Te…
t-hamano 752f587
Merge branch 'trunk' into fix/author-template-fallback
t-hamano 8151386
Use ternary operators
t-hamano cc54872
Use positive conditionals
t-hamano aa29344
Fix typo
t-hamano File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Now this conditional is more than a simple guard clause, perhaps it should test for the positive scenario? Sort of like the code style guidelines recommend for ternary operators.
I don't feel strongly about this but it might be good to have all three locations logic match at least 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review!
I rewrote the two places by 8151386. If I rewrite this part using the ternary operator, nested conditional statements will occur, so I think it's fine as is, but what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apologies if I wasn't clear with my suggestion. I didn't mean that you needed to change these if/else statements to ternaries, just that we should check the positive case first. Like what is suggested for when you do use ternary operators.
This is such a minor detail, don't feel you need to keep changing the code over it.
Below is a quick diff to illustrate what I was originally suggesting:
Example diff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I mistakenly thought that I should use ternary operators itself. I understand what you mean 😅