Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems the intent of that function is not clear. Does it assume that the passed date is a given timezone? Should we remove that assumption? Should we clarify it in the description of the function.
Anyway, it seems like the current fix is good anyway but there might be something wrong with
dateI18n
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think by default the dateI18n assumes the time is in the user's timezone and formats it in the website time zone.
I think we may have other cases where we are using dateI18n for dates that are already on the website timezone. I will try to propose a follow-up PR that improves documentation for this function and maybe fixes additional issues.