Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure that if the stacktrace fallback is required it always has formatting support #359

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

Twon
Copy link
Owner

@Twon Twon commented Mar 3, 2025

This in particular was exposred by gcc-14 when it was build without the --enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes flag. In this case it does not ship with the __cpp_lib_stacktrace enabled, but the __cpp_lib_fomatters flag indicated stack trace formatting is supported...

Here we need to say if we are using boost stacktrace when we need to define a formatter for it.

@Twon Twon merged commit d298c21 into main Mar 3, 2025
24 checks passed
@Twon Twon deleted the stacktrace_fallback_has_format_support branch March 3, 2025 10:53
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (a294c42) to head (1677e89).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@     Coverage Diff     @@
##   main   #359   +/-   ##
===========================
===========================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant