Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document fix in version 2.5.2 #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

JoergSiebahn
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I'm not sure if this is the correct way to document that version 2.5.2 fixes the issue.

Coming through a lot of references and links, finally from https://ossindex.sonatype.org/vulnerability/CVE-2024-57699, and the discussions are still ongoing, I thought it's a good idea to have a proof in code somewhere.

Maybe this PR does not need to be merged but just stay for documentation purposes.

@TurtleLiu
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

I'm not sure if this is the correct way to document that version 2.5.2 fixes the issue.

Coming through a lot of references and links, finally from https://ossindex.sonatype.org/vulnerability/CVE-2024-57699, and the discussions are still ongoing, I thought it's a good idea to have a proof in code somewhere.

Maybe this PR does not need to be merged but just stay for documentation purposes.

Thanks for your PR! I also think the fix should be documented, or so many projects can not be built because of the security alert of this vulnerability.

@JoergSiebahn JoergSiebahn deleted the fixed/2.5.2 branch February 14, 2025 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants