Fix Workflow Concurrency

[PSchmiedmayer]

Fix Workflow Concurrency

♻️ Current situation & Problem

• ${{ github.workflow }} seems to be inherited from the parent workflow as noted in https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/30708

⚙️ Release Notes

• Adds concrete names for the concurrency groups.

📝 Code of Conduct & Contributing Guidelines

By submitting creating this pull request, you agree to follow our Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines:

• I agree to follow the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.

[PSchmiedmayer]

@Supereg It seems like the license tests are failing due to the Account sheet showing a loading state when selecting the account profile in the relevant UI test. It seems like this a bit of a flakey behavior; wondering if we have any ideas how we might be able to stabilize this a bit so we don't have to re-run tests. I could observe some of that behavior in the UI test recordings in the latest runs.

[Supereg]

@Supereg It seems like the license tests are failing due to the Account sheet showing a loading state when selecting the account profile in the relevant UI test. It seems like this a bit of a flakey behavior; wondering if we have any ideas how we might be able to stabilize this a bit so we don't have to re-run tests. I could observe some of that behavior in the UI test recordings in the latest runs.

The problem there was our test account setup, that kicked in exactly when we contributions tests opened the account sheet. Our default behavior after signup for the TemplateApp AccountSetup sheet is to dismiss the sheet again (also because this view is presented for the accountRequired modifier). I made the change that we disable this automatic dismiss when the presentation was user initiated. For example, if the user decides to open the Account Sheet themselves and signs in, we won't dismiss the sheet but show the AccountOverview.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.73%. Comparing base (ea08d6d) to head (c6c5cd9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
TemplateApplication/Account/AccountSheet.swift	42.86%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #92      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.92%   86.73%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines         688      693       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits          598      601       +3     
- Misses         90       92       +2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
TemplateApplication/HomeView.swift	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
TemplateApplication/Account/AccountSheet.swift	69.05% <42.86%> (-1.22%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ea08d6d...c6c5cd9. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[PSchmiedmayer]

Nice; thank you for the fix @Supereg! Feel free to merge the PR once all the reasonable tests are passing.