Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NET-934 Modify S1643: Add benchmarks #4593

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

sebastien-marichal
Copy link
Contributor

@sebastien-marichal sebastien-marichal commented Jan 6, 2025

NET-934

Part of NET-929

Review

A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:

  • logical errors and incorrect information
  • information gaps and missing content
  • text style and tone
  • PR summary and labels follow the guidelines

rules/S1643/csharp/rule.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rules/S1643/csharp/rule.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rules/S1643/csharp/rule.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
rules/S1643/csharp/rule.adoc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sebastien-marichal sebastien-marichal merged commit a2aa406 into master Jan 8, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
@sebastien-marichal sebastien-marichal deleted the sma/modify-s1643 branch January 8, 2025 09:23
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the .Net Framework is not correct

Comment on lines +47 to +48
| StringConcatenation | .NET Framework 4.6.2 | 33,922.61 us | 302.498 us | 586450.35 KB
| StringBuilder | .NET Framework 4.6.2 | 178.14 us | 9.010 us | 244.15 KB

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
| StringConcatenation | .NET Framework 4.6.2 | 33,922.61 us | 302.498 us | 586450.35 KB
| StringBuilder | .NET Framework 4.6.2 | 178.14 us | 9.010 us | 244.15 KB
| StringConcatenation | .NET Framework 4.8.1 | 33,922.61 us | 302.498 us | 586450.35 KB
| StringBuilder | .NET Framework 4.8.1 | 178.14 us | 9.010 us | 244.15 KB

12th Gen Intel Core i7-12800H, 1 CPU, 20 logical and 14 physical cores
[Host] : .NET Framework 4.8.1 (4.8.9282.0), X64 RyuJIT VectorSize=256
.NET 9.0 : .NET 9.0.0 (9.0.24.52809), X64 RyuJIT AVX2
.NET Framework 4.6.2 : .NET Framework 4.8.1 (4.8.9282.0), X64 RyuJIT VectorSize=256

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
.NET Framework 4.6.2 : .NET Framework 4.8.1 (4.8.9282.0), X64 RyuJIT VectorSize=256
.NET Framework 4.8.1 : .NET Framework 4.8.1 (4.8.9282.0), X64 RyuJIT VectorSize=256

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants