Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't hold lock in input_intercept callback and don't expose xkb:: types in safe API #1533

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

ids1024
Copy link
Member

@ids1024 ids1024 commented Sep 13, 2024

See commits messages for descriptions of the changes here. The last commit is potentially more controversial than the earlier ones; if it's an issue, I think the Xkb changes in the others are a good improvement at least.

Copy link
Member

@Drakulix Drakulix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems sensible, this deadlock has been bugging me a lot.

@ids1024
Copy link
Member Author

ids1024 commented Sep 18, 2024

Hopefully we can improve things here more in the future, since none of this seems perfect, but the changes here at least clean up confusing behavior in the API around mutex locking (and the technical soundness issue of providing safe xkb accessors) without any significant change to the API.

It's cleaner to make the `unsafe impl Send` more fine-grained, and this
should help with some future changes.

Since `XkbContextHandler` is public, this fixes a soundness issue in the
public API, since it was possible with a safe call to get an
`xkb::Keymap` and `xkb::State`, and clone those. Potentially violating
the safety assumption of the `Send` implementation.
Using composition like this seems like a cleaner solution than a trait
with default implementations.
Copy link
Member

@Drakulix Drakulix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Needs a rebase, but other than that, I'd say this is ready to go.

It is definitely an improvement over the current state of things.

Holding a mutex during the callback causes a deadlock if something
invoked by the callback tries to call a `KeyboardHandle` method. Or if
the callback locks another mutex, which in another thread may be held
while the keyboard mutex is locked.

This is bad, and the mutex here should generally be a hidden
implementation detail. Or if absolutely necessarily this restriction
should be documented.

This requirements to make this work aren't ideal, but probably aren't a
problem. We have to create a copy of `mods_state` on the stack. `Xkb`
needs to be store in an `Arc<Mutex<_>>` for finer-grained locking. And
`modified_syms()` and `raw_syms()` need to return `Vec`s instead of
slices.

The `Vec`s could be changed back to slices in the type signatures if we
used `OnceCell` to cache the return value, but that probably doesn't
matter that much in practice.
No longer needed now that this isn't part of a trait.
@Drakulix Drakulix merged commit 08d31e1 into Smithay:master Sep 18, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants