Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Skylink Hash (pt2) #20

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 25, 2022
Merged

Use Skylink Hash (pt2) #20

merged 10 commits into from
Apr 25, 2022

Conversation

peterjan
Copy link

@peterjan peterjan commented Feb 15, 2022

PULL REQUEST

Overview

This PR simply cleans up some lingering mentions of "skylinks" and uses of skylinks. The most important thing it does is it allows POST'ing a hash instead of a skylink. This will allow us to convert the other middleware services and clear the database of skylinks entirely.

Example for Visual Changes

N/A

Checklist

Review and complete the checklist to ensure that the PR is complete before assigned to an approver.

  • All new methods or updated methods have clear docstrings
  • Testing added or updated for new methods
  • Verify if any changes impact the WebPortal Health Checks
  • Approriate documentation updated
  • Changelog file created

Issues Closed

N/A

@peterjan peterjan changed the title Use Skylink Hash pt 2 Use Skylink Hash (pt2) Feb 15, 2022
@peterjan peterjan changed the base branch from main to pj/skylink-to-hash February 15, 2022 14:23
Base automatically changed from pj/skylink-to-hash to main February 19, 2022 14:51
@peterjan peterjan marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2022 11:35
@peterjan peterjan requested a review from ro-tex April 21, 2022 08:20
@peterjan peterjan requested a review from kwypchlo April 22, 2022 07:39
@peterjan peterjan merged commit bdc3673 into main Apr 25, 2022
@peterjan peterjan deleted the pj/skylink-to-hash-pt-2 branch April 25, 2022 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants