Enable cache again

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

PR Quality Checklist

• I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black .
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[ai-maintainer]

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Enable cache again

Title 👍

Title is clear and concise

The title of the pull request, "Enable cache again," is clear and concise. It effectively communicates the purpose of the changes.

Description 👎

Description is missing

The description of the pull request is missing. It is important to provide a clear and concise overview of the rationale behind the change, including relevant context, prior discussions, or links to related issues. This helps ensure that the change aligns with the project's overall direction.

Scope of Changes 👎

Unable to determine the scope of changes

Based on the provided information, it is not possible to determine whether the changes in the pull request are narrowly focused or if the author is trying to resolve multiple issues simultaneously. The description of the specific, focused change made in the pull request is missing. It is important for the description to clearly detail the modifications made and avoid any unrelated or "extra" changes.

Testing 👎

Testing details are missing

The provided information does not include any details about how the author tested the changes. It is important for the author to describe the testing approach they followed to ensure the changes are functioning as expected. This could include information about any unit tests, integration tests, or manual testing that was performed.

Code Changes 👍

Code changes are clear and concise

The code changes in the pull request are clear and concise. The change is focused on enabling the cache by modifying the `HELICONE_CACHE_ENABLED` environment variable in the GitHub Actions workflow file.

Recommendations

Please provide a detailed description of the changes, including the rationale behind the change and any relevant context or discussions. Also, describe the testing approach you followed to ensure the changes are functioning as expected. This will help reviewers understand the purpose and impact of the changes.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer