Fix linter

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

PR Quality Checklist

• I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black . --exclude test.py
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[github-actions]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: The main theme of this PR is to fix linter issues in the code.
• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring
• ✨ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused as it only deals with fixing linter issues.
• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

• General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and focused on fixing linter issues. It's good to see that the contributor is following best practices for code quality. However, it would be beneficial to add some tests to ensure that the changes haven't introduced any new issues.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/utils/challenge.py
    suggestion: Consider adding a comment to explain why the two lines are being removed. This will help other developers understand the reasoning behind the change. [medium]
    relevant line: -

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.