Fix pipes issue

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

PR Quality Checklist

• I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black .
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[ai-maintainer]

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Allow change location of reports

Title and Description 👍

The Title and Description are clear and concise

The title and description of the pull request are clear and concise. They effectively communicate the purpose of the changes, which is to allow changing the location of reports. The description provides a good context for the changes and includes a PR Quality Checklist, indicating that the author has taken steps to ensure code quality and adherence to coding standards.

Scope of Changes 👍

The changes are narrowly focused

The changes in this pull request are narrowly focused on allowing the change of the location of reports. There are no unrelated or "extra" changes present in the diff. This focused approach is commendable as it helps ensure that the changes are easier to review, understand, and integrate into the project.

Testing ⚠️

Testing details are not provided

The description does not explicitly mention how the author tested the changes. While the PR Quality Checklist suggests that the author has taken steps to ensure code quality, it would be beneficial to provide more details about the testing process. This could include information about any unit tests, integration tests, or manual testing that was performed.

Code Changes 👍

Code changes are appropriate and well-implemented

The code changes in the diff are appropriate and well-implemented. The use of environment variables to allow changing the location of reports is a flexible solution that should work well in different environments. The changes to the GitHub Actions workflow and the calculate_info_test_path function are consistent with this approach.

Recommendations

• Please provide more details about how the changes were tested. This could include information about any unit tests, integration tests, or manual testing that was performed.
• Consider adding comments to the code to explain the purpose of the changes and how they work. This can help other developers understand the code more easily and reduce the risk of future bugs or regressions.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer