You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything looks nice. I did not find any errors or layout mistakes.
Only real recommendation is to include a device of just the waveguide between the two couplers to de-embed, to use as reference. Also a symmetric MZI might be helpful for final analysis report, so you know where your 0 and 1 are.
The first device will have a FSR on 1nm (I'm sure you already know and did it purposely), and it will be at the edge of what is recommended for this course.
I sure you also know that last three MZI are the same, I guess for reproducibility purposes (or they look like that to me, and also simulation wise).
9fd4799There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Everything looks nice. I did not find any errors or layout mistakes.
Only real recommendation is to include a device of just the waveguide between the two couplers to de-embed, to use as reference. Also a symmetric MZI might be helpful for final analysis report, so you know where your 0 and 1 are.
The first device will have a FSR on 1nm (I'm sure you already know and did it purposely), and it will be at the edge of what is recommended for this course.
I sure you also know that last three MZI are the same, I guess for reproducibility purposes (or they look like that to me, and also simulation wise).