Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 19, 2021. It is now read-only.

Remove linting from CI tests #51

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2016
Merged

Remove linting from CI tests #51

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2016

Conversation

cshold
Copy link
Contributor

@cshold cshold commented Nov 9, 2016

Was getting failed tests because of this line

@macdonaldr93 @m-ux

@cshold cshold self-assigned this Nov 9, 2016
@macdonaldr93
Copy link
Contributor

Just looking over this again, I don't even think we need to start up node... We don't do anything with it. The only test is run in Ruby. How do we feel about removing all the node related code for now?

@cshold
Copy link
Contributor Author

cshold commented Nov 9, 2016

The i18n tests are going to be rewritten in JS as far as I know, so might as well keep it around

@macdonaldr93
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@cshold cshold merged commit 1dc6a12 into master Nov 10, 2016
@cshold cshold deleted the remove-linting branch November 10, 2016 14:41
t-kelly pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2017
* fix circle ci test on gen

* update Slate hash
t-kelly pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2017
t-kelly pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2017
* fix circle ci test on gen

* update Slate hash
t-kelly pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2017
t-kelly pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2017
* fix circle ci test on gen

* update Slate hash
t-kelly pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2017
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 26, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 26, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants