Support for IPv6 #818
Merged
Support for IPv6 #818
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hyperlink
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We should support kafka-node for IPv6 as well. I've updated the parseHost function to parse both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. According to RFC 3986 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986), an IPv6 address is supposed to be wrapped by brackets and separated with port number by a colon.
eg. [2001:bd4:32:4d21:225d:1f22:113:2535]:9092
This an example of presented IPv6 address a client is supposed to receive as the kafkaHost option.