Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[BREAKING] Drop node v21 support #720

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

[BREAKING] Drop node v21 support #720

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024
+1 −10

Conversation

flovogt
Copy link
Member

@flovogt flovogt commented Jul 17, 2024

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

coverage: 96.762%. remained the same
when pulling 2938f35 on drop-node-21-support
into a1ef33a on main.

@flovogt flovogt force-pushed the drop-node-21-support branch from 5b41e7b to 989ea4a Compare July 23, 2024 11:55
@flovogt flovogt requested a review from RandomByte July 23, 2024 12:26
@flovogt flovogt marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2024 12:26
RandomByte
RandomByte approved these changes Jul 23, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@RandomByte RandomByte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test failure can be ignored, matrix is still using node 21 in this PR

@flovogt flovogt force-pushed the drop-node-21-support branch from 989ea4a to 2938f35 Compare July 23, 2024 16:26
@flovogt flovogt merged commit 891306f into main Jul 23, 2024
17 checks passed
@flovogt flovogt deleted the drop-node-21-support branch July 23, 2024 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@RandomByte RandomByte RandomByte approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@flovogt @coveralls @RandomByte