Updates rollup version

[walmazacn]

Description

Changes proposed in this pull request:

• updates rollup version

Related issue(s)

Resolves #3953 | See also related issues:

• Bump vite from 5.3.3 to 5.4.6 in /core/examples/luigi-example-vue #3918
• Bump rollup from 4.18.1 to 4.22.4 in /core/examples/luigi-example-vue #3943
• Bump vite and @angular-devkit/build-angular in /core/examples/luigi-example-angular #3952
• Bump rollup from 3.29.4 to 3.29.5 in /test/e2e-test-application #3955
• Bump rollup from 2.79.1 to 2.79.2 in /client-frameworks-support/client-support-angular #3966

[ndricimrr]

I think we can use this PR to update rollup wherever possible that includes the following:

• client-frameworks-support/client-support-angular
• core
• test/e2e-test-application
• website/docs
• core/examples/luigi-example-angular
• core/examples/luigi-example-vue
• core/examples/luigi-example-angular

I think rollup is used there but as a "child" dependency of another dependency. You can find these if you search "rollup" and it will show up in package-lock.jsons that you can use to find out which parent dependency has it as a child and update that. I think this issue is quite popular and many other packages might have already updated rollup internally.

Example: @angular-devkit/build-angular depends on "rollup": "4.20.0", on our luigi-example-angular and it was already bumped on their side here

In case some pacakge that we use hasn't updated their rollup dep then you can note it down in the PR description. (Maybe we can also fix it with "overrides")

[walmazacn]

I updated what's possible without breaking changes. The following stuff cannot be updated easily:

• 'core'
• 'client-frameworks-support\client-support-angular'

Btw, it seems rollup in 'core/examples' is already safe enough (version 4+)

[ndricimrr]

Looking at the reports following ranges are affected for rollup, so its not just older versions. v4 too :

< 2.79.2           , patch = 2.79.2
>= 3.0.0, < 3.29.5 , patch = 3.29.5
>= 4.0.0, < 4.22.4 , patch = 4.22.5

So I think we should update the core examples as well if they are in the range and are not too much of a hassle to update.

[ndricimrr]

One comment about the container

[ndricimrr]

Built and ran the packages locally to make sure. And it all looks good.