Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider a consistent sorting of article actions across article types (communication channels) #4056

Closed
stefanhaerter opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider a consistent sorting of article actions across article types (communication channels) #4056

stefanhaerter opened this issue Jan 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
@stefanhaerter
Labels
tidying Tidying of the code
Milestone
OTOBO 11.1.1

Comments

@stefanhaerter
Copy link
Contributor

Currently, the article actions defined in Ticket::Frontend::Article::Actions[ChannelName] are - as far as I'm aware - not sorted consistently and use a different range of priority numbers. I would want to:

  1. Make sure that the same action has the same priority number across all channels
  2. Make sure that the sorting is consistent
  3. Think about one consistent number range which leaves enough space for package developments
@stefanhaerter stefanhaerter added the tidying Tidying of the code label Jan 14, 2025
@stefanhaerter stefanhaerter added this to the OTOBO 11.1 milestone Jan 14, 2025
@stefanhaerter stefanhaerter self-assigned this Jan 21, 2025
stefanhaerter added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2025
@stefanhaerter
Issue #4056: Changed priority for MarkArticleSeenUnseen to 1000 consi…
531360e 
…stently.
stefanhaerter added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2025
@stefanhaerter
Issue #4056: Removed MarkArticleSeenUnseen from Invalid backend.
6f6c67f 
Removed ArticleEdit from Phone backend.
This was referenced Jan 21, 2025
Merged
Merged
svenoe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2025
@stefanhaerter @svenoe
Issue #4056: Changed priority for MarkArticleSeenUnseen to 1000 consi…
76de941 
…stently.
svenoe pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2025
@stefanhaerter @svenoe
Issue #4056: Removed MarkArticleSeenUnseen from Invalid backend.
9ec5ee9 
Removed ArticleEdit from Phone backend.
@stefanhaerter
Copy link
Contributor Author

closed with PRs merged

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stefanhaerter stefanhaerter

Labels
tidying Tidying of the code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
OTOBO 11.1.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@stefanhaerter