Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expand apostrophe section in writing-policy.md #20

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

christianlegge
Copy link
Contributor

Rewrites the apostrophe section to be more inclusive of when apostrophes are used (and not used) in English. The previous version is worded a little strangely in places and doesn't mention the (in my view) most common error, which is using apostrophes with plurals.

I didn't want to change any subjective policy here, but I think, if you want this to be part of the policy, adding a note that contractions should generally be avoided would not be out of place here. That's a pretty common guideline for formal writing. But for the sake of this PR I just wanted to keep it to objective English grammar stuff.

Apologies that I've been bugging you with this section lately, with me editing the wiki, then that had to get reverted, then I dm'd the QA team with a now-broken link... This should be the last you hear of it from me!

Rewrites the apostrophe section to be more inclusive of when apostrophes are used (and not used) in English. The previous version is worded a little strangely in places and doesn't mention the (in my view) most common error, which is using apostrophes with plurals.

I didn't want to change any subjective policy here, but I think, if you want this to be part of the policy, adding a note that contractions should generally be avoided would not be out of place here. That's a pretty common guideline for formal writing. But for the sake of this PR I just wanted to keep it to objective English grammar stuff.

Apologies that I've been bugging you with this section lately, with me editing the wiki, then that had to get reverted, then I dm'd the QA team with a now-broken link... This should be the last you hear of it from me!
@suspect15
Copy link
Contributor

PR adds useful delineation of case. Recommend approval.

@wescopeland wescopeland merged commit dcdcfc3 into RetroAchievements:main Jun 4, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants