fix: issue with missing values

[rodrigopavezi]

Changes:

• Fix handling missing values for calculateItemTotal

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved reliability of total calculations for invoice items by ensuring default values for potentially undefined properties, preventing NaN results.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rodrigopavezi has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46c12b6 and a4c2722.

Walkthrough

The changes in the useExportPDF function improve the calculateItemTotal function by introducing default values for potentially undefined properties of the item object. This prevents NaN results in calculations by ensuring that item.discount, item.unitPrice, and item.tax?.amount default to 0 if they are undefined or null. The overall functionality remains unchanged, but the implementation is now more robust against missing data.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/lib/hooks/use-export-pdf.tsx	Enhanced calculateItemTotal to provide default values for item.discount, item.unitPrice, and item.tax?.amount to prevent NaN results in calculations. No changes to function signatures.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd196ae and 8982db9.

Files selected for processing (1)

• src/lib/hooks/use-export-pdf.tsx (1 hunks)

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8982db9 and 46c12b6.

Files selected for processing (1)

• src/lib/hooks/use-export-pdf.tsx (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

src/lib/hooks/use-export-pdf.tsx (1)

48-51: Review: Improved handling of missing values in calculateItemTotal.

The changes made to the calculateItemTotal function effectively address the issue of missing values by using destructuring with default values. This approach ensures that the function does not return NaN when properties such as discount, unitPrice, or tax.amount are undefined or null. The implementation is clean, follows modern JavaScript practices, and enhances the robustness of the function.

Code Review:

• Correctness: The logic correctly handles missing values and prevents errors in calculations.
• Performance: The use of destructuring and default values is efficient in this context.
• Readability: The code is more readable and maintainable due to the clear structure of default assignments.
• Best Practices: The use of destructuring aligns with modern JavaScript practices and makes the code cleaner.

Overall, the changes are well-implemented and improve the function's reliability and maintainability.