Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(bindNodeCallback): add more details and examples #2326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2017
Merged

docs(bindNodeCallback): add more details and examples #2326

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2017

Conversation

mpodlasin
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

Another attempt to make docs more in-depth and complete, with descriptions of all modes of usage and more examples.

More background on what and why I am doing is here: #2322

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.689% when pulling 0f81150 on Podlas29:bind-node-callback-docs into 3ec315d on ReactiveX:master.

Add more in depth descriptions about various modes of operator usage
and potential problems involded. Add more examples illustrating
points in the description. Add references and comparisons to other
similar operators. Add note about using schedulers to control operator.
Describe when input function is actually called.
@mpodlasin
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi.

Just as in #2322 I have added notes about schedulers and how observable laziness affects when input function is called.

Also changed little bit how some things are described.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 8, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 97.689% when pulling c481957 on Podlas29:bind-node-callback-docs into 6ce4773 on ReactiveX:master.

@benlesh benlesh merged commit 2667650 into ReactiveX:master Feb 21, 2017
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 6, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants