-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SwitchFirst operator #645
Comments
I don't think anyone is working on it. I think you're right, though, the name needs work. It subscribes to the first Observable it gets until it completes, dropping all others, then subscribes to the next one. It's almost a weird specialization of For now it could be named Also, it can land in KitchenSink for now until we bikeshed what to do with it. |
... also for now, let's skip the concurrency parameter until that can be discussed further. I'm not against it, I just haven't thought about it. |
I think this can be closed now - @jinroh , may I possibly ask if there's additional PR might be required for this issue? |
I don't think there is any more work to do here. If there is we can open another issue. Closing for now. |
Is anyone working on the implementation of
SwitchFirst
right now ? If not I'd be happy to ! (I really need it in one of my project)Some bikeshed I'd like to discuss before starting implementation:
switchLatest
in favor ofswitchMap
(I don't think the comment from @mattpodwysocki in issue Bike-Shedding: renamingflatMap
,flatMapLatest
for consistency and ease of adoption #167 has been adressed). What aboutswitchFirst
andswitchMapFirst
to matchswitch
andswitchMap
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: