We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#4546 broke revdep dtts https://rcdata.nau.edu/genomic-ml/data.table-revdeps/analyze/2024-07-16/
* checking tests ... Running 'tinytest.R' ERROR Running the tests in 'tests/tinytest.R' failed. Last 13 lines of output: diff| Column 'index': Mean relative difference: 0.01851852 ----- FAILED[attr]: test_dtts.R<128--128> call| expect_equal(align(dt1, t2, start = as.nanoduration(0), end = one_second_duration, call| --> eopen = FALSE), dt1[seq(5, 50, 5)]) diff| Column 'index': Mean relative difference: 0.01785714 ----- FAILED[attr]: test_dtts.R<139--139> call| expect_equal(align(dt1, t2, start = -one_second_period, tz = "America/New_York"), call| --> dt1[seq(4, 49, 5)]) diff| Column 'index': Mean relative difference: 0.01851852 ----- FAILED[attr]: test_dtts.R<149--149> call| expect_equal(align(dt1, t2, end = one_second_period, eopen = FALSE, call| --> tz = "America/New_York"), dt1[seq(5, 50, 5)]) diff| Column 'index': Mean relative difference: 0.01785714 Error: 4 out of 102 tests failed Execution halted
@MichaelChirico @ben-schwen can you please investigate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sent eddelbuettel/dtts#18
Sorry, something went wrong.
Just to reiterate -- the new dtts is at CRAN now so no worries on your end:
dtts
Thanks Dirk! Our protocol here is to wait for a ➕ report from the revdeps server; I see that now:
https://rcdata.nau.edu/genomic-ml/data.table-revdeps/analyze/2024-07-19/
So closing.
tdhock
MichaelChirico
No branches or pull requests
#4546 broke revdep dtts https://rcdata.nau.edu/genomic-ml/data.table-revdeps/analyze/2024-07-16/
@MichaelChirico @ben-schwen can you please investigate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: