Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use only upper triangle to define the orbital optimization rotation #130

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

caleb-johnson
Copy link
Collaborator

@caleb-johnson caleb-johnson commented Jan 29, 2025

Fixes #122

@caleb-johnson caleb-johnson marked this pull request as draft January 29, 2025 14:59
@caleb-johnson caleb-johnson marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 20:04
Copy link
Collaborator

@kevinsung kevinsung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! So it looks like this change significantly improved the performance of the optimization, is that correct?

@caleb-johnson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thank you! So it looks like this change significantly improved the performance of the optimization, is that correct?

I had changed some of the SQD parameters in the notebook. I went back and restored the defaults and the energy improvement went from .001 to .007. Cutting the search space in >half is definitely great :)

caleb-johnson and others added 2 commits January 30, 2025 08:32
Co-authored-by: Kevin J. Sung <kevjsung@umich.edu>
@caleb-johnson caleb-johnson merged commit b2782dc into main Jan 30, 2025
10 checks passed
@caleb-johnson caleb-johnson deleted the ooo branch January 30, 2025 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Orbital optimization uses redundant parameters
2 participants