Bugfix/minor fixes

[preet-bhadra]

Important

Fixes targetHandle formatting for router nodes in initializeFlow function in flowSlice.ts.

• Behavior:
  • In flowSlice.ts, initializeFlow function now ensures targetHandle for router nodes is correctly formatted.
  • Checks if targetHandle includes a dot and ensures it has the correct prefix node_id.handle_id.
• Misc:
  • No other changes in the file.

^{This description was created by for 605cdd2. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 605cdd2 in 2 minutes and 18 seconds

More details

• Looked at 47 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 4 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. frontend/src/store/flowSlice.ts:153

• Draft comment:
  Consider memoizing or caching the lookup for sourceNode if links is large to avoid repeated Array.find calls.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50%
  None

2. frontend/src/store/flowSlice.ts:157

• Draft comment:
  Verify if using link.source_id as the fallback for targetHandle (and for prefixing) is intended for RouterNode connections.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the author to verify their intention regarding the use of link.source_id as a fallback for targetHandle. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or ask for a test to be written, which would make it acceptable.

3. frontend/src/store/flowSlice.ts:154

• Draft comment:
  Consider using the mapped state.nodes (with processed nodeObj) when checking the node type instead of the original nodes from the definition. This avoids potential inconsistencies in node structure.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%

1. The code is in initializeFlow where we're processing the initial definition. 2. state.nodes was just populated with processed nodes right before this code. 3. Both arrays should contain the same nodes at this point. 4. The only difference is that state.nodes has some additional UI-related properties. 5. The node_type property should be identical in both arrays.
   The comment assumes there could be inconsistencies between the arrays, but at this point in the code they should be perfectly in sync since we just created state.nodes from the definition nodes.
   While the arrays are in sync here, using state.nodes would be more consistent with the rest of the codebase and would be more resilient to future changes.
   The comment should be deleted. While using state.nodes would be slightly more consistent, the suggestion is not important enough to warrant a comment since both arrays contain the same data at this point.

4. frontend/src/store/flowSlice.ts:158

• Draft comment:
  Double-check that when link.target_handle is missing, defaulting to link.source_id leads to 'nodeId.nodeId' format, and that splitting on '.' (which always takes the last segment) handles cases with multiple dots as intended.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is asking the PR author to double-check the behavior of the code when a certain condition is met. It violates the rule against asking the author to confirm or ensure behavior. It does not provide a specific suggestion or ask for a test to be written.

Workflow ID: wflow_ySCcDLR9aRfRfh04

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.