Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add missing currency_year for FOM #163

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 20, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
34 changes: 17 additions & 17 deletions inputs/manual_input.csv
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -185,14 +185,14 @@ Ammonia cracker,FOM,2050,4.3,%/year,2015,"Ishimoto et al. (2020): 10.1016/j.ijhy
Ammonia cracker,ammonia-input,0,1.46,MWh_NH3/MWh_H2,,"ENGIE et al (2020): Ammonia to Green Hydrogen Feasibility Study (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880826/HS420_-_Ecuity_-_Ammonia_to_Green_Hydrogen.pdf), Fig. 10.",Assuming a integrated 200t/d cracking and purification facility. Electricity demand (316 MWh per 2186 MWh_LHV H2 output) is assumed to also be ammonia LHV input which seems a fair assumption as the facility has options for a higher degree of integration according to the report).
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,investment,2015,2628000,EUR/(t_HVC/h),2015,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Table 35",Assuming CAPEX of 1200 €/t actually given in €/(t/a).
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,lifetime,2015,30,years,-,Guesstimate,same as steam cracker
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,FOM,2015,3,%/year,-,Guesstimate,same as steam cracker
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,FOM,2015,3,%/year,2015,Guesstimate,same as steam cracker
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,VOM,2015,30,€/t_HVC,2015,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Table 35",
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,electricity-input,2015,1.3889,MWh_el/t_HVC,-,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), page 69",5 GJ/t_HVC
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,methanol-input,2015,18.03,MWh_MeOH/t_HVC,-,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Sections 4.5 (for ethylene and propylene) and 4.6 (for BTX)","Weighted average: 2.83 t_MeOH/t_ethylene+propylene for 21.7 Mt of ethylene and 17 Mt of propylene, 4.2 t_MeOH/t_BTX for 15.7 Mt of BTX. Assuming 5.54 MWh_MeOH/t_MeOH. "
methanol-to-olefins/aromatics,carbondioxide-output,2015,0.6107,t_CO2/t_HVC,-,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Sections 4.5 (for ethylene and propylene) and 4.6 (for BTX)","Weighted average: 0.4 t_MeOH/t_ethylene+propylene for 21.7 Mt of ethylene and 17 Mt of propylene, 1.13 t_CO2/t_BTX for 15.7 Mt of BTX. The report also references process emissions of 0.55 t_MeOH/t_ethylene+propylene elsewhere. "
electric steam cracker,investment,2015,10512000,EUR/(t_HVC/h),2015,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Table 35",Assuming CAPEX of 1200 €/t actually given in €/(t/a).
electric steam cracker,lifetime,2015,30,years,-,Guesstimate,
electric steam cracker,FOM,2015,3,%/year,-,Guesstimate,
electric steam cracker,FOM,2015,3,%/year,2015,Guesstimate,
electric steam cracker,VOM,2015,180,€/t_HVC,2015,"DECHEMA 2017: DECHEMA: Low carbon energy and feedstock for the European chemical industry (https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/Technology_study_Low_carbon_energy_and_feedstock_for_the_European_chemical_industry.pdf), Table 35",
electric steam cracker,naphtha-input,2015,14.8,MWh_naphtha/t_HVC,-,"Lechtenböhmer et al. (2016): 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.110, Section 4.3, page 6.",
electric steam cracker,electricity-input,2015,2.7,MWh_el/t_HVC,-,"Lechtenböhmer et al. (2016): 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.110, Section 4.3, page 6.",Assuming electrified processing.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -258,10 +258,10 @@ csp-tower,investment,2020,159.96,"EUR/kW_th,dp",2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.n
csp-tower,investment,2030,108.37,"EUR/kW_th,dp",2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include solar field and solar tower as well as EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant). Total costs (223,708,924 USD) are divided by active area (heliostat reflective area, 1,269,054 m2) and multiplied by design point DNI (0.95 kW/m2) to obtain EUR/kW_th. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower,investment,2040,99.97,"EUR/kW_th,dp",2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include solar field and solar tower as well as EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant). Total costs (223,708,924 USD) are divided by active area (heliostat reflective area, 1,269,054 m2) and multiplied by design point DNI (0.95 kW/m2) to obtain EUR/kW_th. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower,investment,2050,99.38,"EUR/kW_th,dp",2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include solar field and solar tower as well as EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant). Total costs (223,708,924 USD) are divided by active area (heliostat reflective area, 1,269,054 m2) and multiplied by design point DNI (0.95 kW/m2) to obtain EUR/kW_th. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower,FOM,2020,1,%/year,1,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,FOM,2030,1.1,%/year,1.1,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,FOM,2040,1.3,%/year,1.3,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,FOM,2050,1.4,%/year,1.4,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,FOM,2020,1,%/year,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,FOM,2030,1.1,%/year,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,FOM,2040,1.3,%/year,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,FOM,2050,1.4,%/year,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),Ratio between CAPEX and FOM from ATB database for “moderate” scenario.
csp-tower,lifetime,2020,30,years,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),-
csp-tower,lifetime,2030,30,years,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),-
csp-tower,lifetime,2040,30,years,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power),-
Expand All @@ -270,10 +270,10 @@ csp-tower TES,investment,2020,21.43,EUR/kWh_th,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nr
csp-tower TES,investment,2030,14.52,EUR/kWh_th,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include the TES incl. EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant, 2.791 MW_th TES). Total costs (69390776.7 USD) are divided by TES size to obtain EUR/kW_th. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower TES,investment,2040,13.39,EUR/kWh_th,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include the TES incl. EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant, 2.791 MW_th TES). Total costs (69390776.7 USD) are divided by TES size to obtain EUR/kW_th. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower TES,investment,2050,13.32,EUR/kWh_th,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include the TES incl. EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant, 2.791 MW_th TES). Total costs (69390776.7 USD) are divided by TES size to obtain EUR/kW_th. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower TES,FOM,2020,1,%/year,1,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,FOM,2030,1.1,%/year,1.1,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,FOM,2040,1.3,%/year,1.3,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,FOM,2050,1.4,%/year,1.4,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,FOM,2020,1,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,FOM,2030,1.1,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,FOM,2040,1.3,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,FOM,2050,1.4,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,lifetime,2020,30,years,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,lifetime,2030,30,years,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower TES,lifetime,2040,30,years,2020,see solar-tower.,-
Expand All @@ -282,10 +282,10 @@ csp-tower power block,investment,2020,1120.57,EUR/kW_e,2020,ATB CSP data (https:
csp-tower power block,investment,2030,759.17,EUR/kW_e,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include the power cycle incl. BOP and EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant). Total costs (135185685.5 USD) are divided by power block nameplate capacity size to obtain EUR/kW_e. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower power block,investment,2040,700.34,EUR/kW_e,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include the power cycle incl. BOP and EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant). Total costs (135185685.5 USD) are divided by power block nameplate capacity size to obtain EUR/kW_e. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower power block,investment,2050,696.2,EUR/kW_e,2020,ATB CSP data (https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2021/concentrating_solar_power) and NREL SAM v2021.12.2 (https://sam.nrel.gov/).,"Based on NREL’s SAM (v2021.12.2) numbers for a CSP power plant, 2020 numbers. CAPEX degression (=learning) taken from ATB database (“moderate”) scenario. Costs include the power cycle incl. BOP and EPC cost for the default installation size (104 MWe plant). Total costs (135185685.5 USD) are divided by power block nameplate capacity size to obtain EUR/kW_e. Exchange rate: 1.16 USD to 1 EUR."
csp-tower power block,FOM,2020,1,%/year,1,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,FOM,2030,1.1,%/year,1.1,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,FOM,2040,1.3,%/year,1.3,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,FOM,2050,1.4,%/year,1.4,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,FOM,2020,1,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,FOM,2030,1.1,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,FOM,2040,1.3,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,FOM,2050,1.4,%/year,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,lifetime,2020,30,years,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,lifetime,2030,30,years,2020,see solar-tower.,-
csp-tower power block,lifetime,2040,30,years,2020,see solar-tower.,-
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -394,13 +394,13 @@ iron-air battery,FOM,2040,1.1807773334732,%/year,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_E
iron-air battery,investment,2025,23.45,EUR/kWh,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery,investment,2030,15.61,EUR/kWh,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery,investment,2035,11.79,EUR/kWh,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery,investment,2040,10.40,EUR/kWh,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery charge,efficiency,2025,0.70,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery,investment,2040,10.4,EUR/kWh,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery charge,efficiency,2025,0.7,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery charge,efficiency,2030,0.71,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery charge,efficiency,2035,0.73,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery charge,efficiency,2040,0.74,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery discharge,efficiency,2025,0.59,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery discharge,efficiency,2030,0.60,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery discharge,efficiency,2030,0.6,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery discharge,efficiency,2035,0.62,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery discharge,efficiency,2040,0.63,per unit,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
iron-air battery,lifetime,2030,17.5,years,2020,"Form Energy, FormEnergy_Europe_modeling_recommendations_2023.03.pdf, p4",
Loading