Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs/clarify importing modules in SSR pages #178

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 10, 2025

Conversation

lschierer
Copy link
Contributor

@lschierer lschierer commented Feb 4, 2025

Related Issue

ProjectEvergreen/greenwood#1403

Summary of Changes

  1. Clarify usage of custom imports within SSR pages
  2. Update getFrontmatter example to demonstrate usage of setting attributes for import field

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Deploy Preview for super-tapioca-5987ce ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 088bfe4
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/super-tapioca-5987ce/deploys/67a82ee107947a0008560b92
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-178--super-tapioca-5987ce.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@thescientist13 thescientist13 added the docs Greenwood specific content like docs and guides label Feb 6, 2025
@thescientist13 thescientist13 changed the title clarify importing modules in SSR pages docs/clarify importing modules in SSR pages Feb 6, 2025
@thescientist13 thescientist13 self-assigned this Feb 6, 2025
Copy link
Member

@thescientist13 thescientist13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@thescientist13 thescientist13 merged commit 09881dc into ProjectEvergreen:main Feb 10, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Greenwood specific content like docs and guides
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants