fix(experiments): Calculate win probability against control #27804
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
andehen
reviewed
Jan 23, 2025
posthog/hogql_queries/experiments/trends_statistics_v2_count.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
andehen
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2025
|
Size Change: -5 B (0%) Total Size: 1.16 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
📸 UI snapshots have been updated1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:
Triggered by this commit. |
📸 UI snapshots have been updated1 snapshot changes in total. 0 added, 1 modified, 0 deleted:
Triggered by this commit. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #26713
See https://posthog.slack.com/archives/C07PXH2GTGV/p1737374020186379
Changes
Switches all three win probability calculations to calculate the win probability solely against the control, instead of absolute win probability. Docs update: PostHog/posthog.com#10437
Tests document the difference between v1 and v2 behavior.
How did you test this code?
Tests should pass.