Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fixed loadSampleData.ts and added tests #2807

Merged

Conversation

Shreyas2309
Copy link

@Shreyas2309 Shreyas2309 commented Dec 30, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Fixes: Fixed functionality to load sample data into MongoDB collections and verify document counts.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2796

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes. Added unit tests to verify the sample data import process and document count verification.

Snapshots/Videos:

image

Summary

This PR fixes the functionality to import sample data into MongoDB collections and verifies document counts post-import. Additionally, test cases are provided to validate this functionality. The motivation behind this change is to ensure that data can be easily loaded and verified in development environments, facilitating better testing and consistency.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No, this PR does not introduce any breaking changes till now.

Other information

This change helps with the automated setup of sample data for testing and development, ensuring that the data is accurately imported and can be verified post-import.

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added export for listSampleData function to improve module accessibility
    • Introduced new test suite for sample data import verification
  • Chores

    • Updated file path resolution method for improved compatibility
    • Enhanced sample data import testing with document count verification

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request addresses a bug in the sample data loading utility, focusing on resolving file path issues, particularly on Windows systems. The changes modify the loadSampleData.ts file to improve path resolution by using path.resolve and adding the fileURLToPath method. A corresponding test suite is introduced to verify the sample data import process by checking document counts across various models.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts - Added fileURLToPath import
- Exported listSampleData function
- Updated path resolution using path.resolve
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts - Added new test suite for sample data import
- Implemented test to verify document counts
- Added database connection setup and teardown hooks

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Resolve incorrect file path resolution [#2796]
Fix Windows-specific path handling issues [#2796]

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of paths so bright,
Resolving routes with coding might,
Windows woes now fade away,
Sample data finds its way today,
Code leaps forward, clean and tight! 🚀

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (2)

16-23: Ensure tests run independently for parallel execution.
The beforeAll and afterAll hooks manage database connections at a suite level. If future parallelization is desired, consider setting up connections at the test level or providing separate environments. For this current design, it's acceptable as is.


25-33: Catch and log specific errors for easier debugging.
The try/catch block is helpful for handling import errors. For more detailed error diagnostics, you could log the error’s stdout or stderr (if available) after execSync. This would assist in troubleshooting test failures.

src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (1)

Line range hint 31-46: Robust sample data listing function.
The listSampleData function enumerates .json files in the sample_data directory and prints counts. This is a neat approach to ensure content is correct before insertion. For consistency, consider adding basic validation to detect empty or malformed JSON files.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3a085b and 6a38112.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (5 hunks)
  • tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (3)

1-2: Good practice using Vitest and DB utilities.
Great job initializing Vitest and importing database connect/disconnect utilities. This approach provides clear testing boundaries, ensuring each test suite starts with a fresh connection and properly tears down afterward.


34-42: Validation of model existence and document counts looks correct.
You correctly query each model to confirm that the expected documents were imported. This is a good approach for detecting incomplete or misconfigured sample data scenarios early.


44-53: Keep test data in sync with sample data changes.
When sample data changes, the expected document counts (like 15 users, 17280 events, etc.) must be updated. Consider dynamically reading the JSON files to derive counts, or keep an always-updated reference.

tsconfig.json (1)

12-14: Recognize Vitest types in TypeScript.
Adding "vitest" to the types array ensures type definitions are recognized during compilation, preventing type errors in new test files. This is beneficial for maintaining strict type-safety in tests.

src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (3)

3-3: Importing fileURLToPath is essential for ES module path manipulations.
Modernizing the codebase to use fileURLToPath helps with cross-platform compatibility and SSR use cases. This is a best practice for ES module–based projects.


20-20: Confirm the directory resolution logic.
Defining dirname with path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)) aligns the directory reference properly for ES modules. Verify that all references to dirname reflect the correct folder structure, especially if this script is called from different directories.


115-118: Path resolution updated for inserting collections.
Using path.resolve is safer than path.join, especially when dealing with ESM. Good job ensuring the correct file path in a cross-platform manner.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.72%. Comparing base (3a5276a) to head (dc09054).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2807   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.72%   97.72%           
========================================
  Files          364      364           
  Lines        18543    18545    +2     
  Branches      2676     2676           
========================================
+ Hits         18121    18123    +2     
  Misses         417      417           
  Partials         5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (1)

44-53: Performance consideration for large sample data
Testing with very large data sets (e.g., 17,280 events) can affect test performance. If test runtimes become prolonged, consider creating a smaller sample for test purposes while preserving coverage.

src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (1)

115-115: Potential asynchronous race with process.exit(0)
Because process.exit(0) immediately terminates the Node.js process, there is a risk that outstanding asynchronous operations (like database writes) might not finish. If safe shutdown is required, consider an alternative approach (e.g., gracefully closing resources before exit).

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a3a085b and dc09054.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (5 hunks)
  • tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (3)

1-2: Use consistent test naming convention
The test suite and test blocks follow a clear naming pattern. Ensure that all team members adhere to the same style in future tests (e.g., “Sample Data Import Tests” and “should …”).


25-29: Consider verifying command execution environment
Executing execSync("npm run import:sample-data -- --format") within the test may have side effects, depending on the test environment. Consider checking whether the environment is suitable (e.g., not production) or mocking this command in a purely unit-test scenario.


30-32: Ensure that errors are properly handled
The catch block logs the error and rethrows it. This is good, as it ensures the test fails appropriately. Make sure there are no circumstances in which partial data insertion could leave the database in an unexpected state.

src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (2)

3-3: Exporting fileURLToPath
The introduction of fileURLToPath is a robust way to handle ESM module paths across various platforms, including Windows. Good approach.


Line range hint 31-46: Improved resolution of sample data paths
Using path.resolve ensures that file paths are absolute and platform-agnostic, reducing path-related issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants