fixed loadSampleData.ts and added tests #2803
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Shreyas2309 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request updates the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (1)
28-46: **Large dataset verification **
The test checks a high document count (e.g., 17,280 for events). While it’s excellent that you’re confirming the full data load, consider verifying only a smaller sample if performance is a concern or if test runs start taking too long. However, if this is still fast and reliable, no changes are strictly required.src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (1)
Line range hint
33-46: **Handling sample data listing **
Currently, logged formatting inlistSampleDatais well-structured. If you anticipate extremely large directories or wish to run this in minimal console environments, consider a summary print. Otherwise, this is a neat, user-friendly listing.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
package.json(1 hunks)src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts(5 hunks)tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (3)
1-2: Use of Vitest imports and database utilities [Approved]
Good to see the direct imports from Vitest and the project’s DB utilities. Organizing these imports at the top ensures clarity and easy maintainability.
16-23: Proper setup/teardown for DB tests [Approved]
The beforeAll/afterAll hooks cleanly connect and disconnect from the database. This approach is aligned with best practices, preventing leftover connections from interfering with other tests.
25-26: **Sync process execution in a test **
execSync("npm run import:sample-data -- --format", { stdio: "inherit" }) can be slow or environment-dependent. If tests run in parallel or in a CI environment with limited privileges, this may cause unexpected blocking or require advanced permissions. Consider verifying that all test runners and CI environments are set up with the necessary environment to run this command reliably.
tsconfig.json (1)
11-12: Explicit Vitest types inclusion [Approved]
Including "types": ["vitest"] ensures type declarations for Vitest are properly recognized, preventing potential type conflicts. The configuration looks good.
package.json (1)
132-132: **Upgrading @types/node **
Upgrading from ^22.9.0 to ^22.10.2 is generally safe, but confirm compatibility with your target Node versions. If you rely on older Node LTS, double-check that any new type definitions don’t break local or CI environments.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the Node.js version requirements and TypeScript configuration to better assess the impact of the @types/node upgrade.
Upgrading @types/node is safe for this project
The upgrade from ^22.9.0 to ^22.10.2 is safe because:
- The project doesn't specify Node.js engine requirements in package.json
- The TypeScript configuration uses stable targets (ES2016/ES2020)
- The @types/node package is primarily used for standard Node.js type definitions in error classes and other core functionality
- The change is a minor version bump (22.9 to 22.10) which should maintain backward compatibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that upgrading @types/node does not break compilation
# Attempt a full type-check in the repository
npm install
npm run typecheck
Length of output: 1877
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the current Node.js version requirements and TypeScript configuration
cat package.json | grep -A 2 '"engines"'
cat tsconfig.json | grep -A 5 '"compilerOptions"'
# Check for any direct Node.js version dependencies or checks in the codebase
rg "process.version" -A 2
Length of output: 685
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the engines field in package.json directly
cat package.json | jq '.engines'
# Let's also check for any Node.js version-specific API usage
rg "@types/node" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 19901
src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts (4)
3-3: ES module path resolution [Approved]
Importing fileURLToPath from "url" and then deriving __dirname is a recommended pattern for ESM projects. This ensures cross-platform consistency in path handling.
20-20: Explicit dirname usage [Approved]
Defining dirname via fileURLToPath(import.meta.url) eliminates the older CommonJS workaround. This approach is both modern and consistent with ES Module standards.
31-31: Exporting listSampleData [Approved]
Exporting listSampleData is beneficial for test coverage and maintainability. This makes it easier to invoke and verify in external modules.
115-115: **Resolving collection paths **
Using path.resolve(dirname, …) is more robust than relative paths. Just verify that the ../../sample_data directory is correct in all environments (e.g., Docker containers, CI).
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the directory structure and the path resolution to ensure it's correct.
Path resolution to sample_data directory is correct
The verification confirms that:
loadSampleData.tsis located in./src/utilities/- The relative path
../../sample_datafrom this location correctly points to thesample_datadirectory at the repository root - The
sample_datadirectory exists and contains the expected JSON files that would be loaded by the code
The use of path.resolve(dirname, ...) is correct and will work reliably across different environments.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Confirm that the sample_data directory is reachable from the code’s relative path
fd sample_data | xargs ls -l
Length of output: 972
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the location of loadSampleData.ts and its relative path to sample_data
fd loadSampleData.ts --exec dirname {}
Length of output: 58
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (2)
16-24: Add error handling and database cleanup.While the test setup is generally good, consider these improvements:
- Add error handling in the connection hooks
- Clear the database before running tests to ensure a clean state
describe("Sample Data Import Tests", () => { beforeAll(async () => { - await connect(); + try { + await connect(); + // Clear all collections before running tests + await Promise.all([ + User.deleteMany({}), + Organization.deleteMany({}), + Post.deleteMany({}), + Event.deleteMany({}), + Venue.deleteMany({}), + RecurrenceRule.deleteMany({}), + AppUserProfile.deleteMany({}), + ActionItemCategory.deleteMany({}), + AgendaCategoryModel.deleteMany({}) + ]); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to setup test database:', error); + throw error; + } }); afterAll(async () => { - await disconnect(); + try { + await disconnect(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to disconnect from database:', error); + throw error; + } });
28-47: Consider making document counts configurable.The expected document counts are currently hard-coded in the test. Consider:
- Moving these values to a configuration file
- Importing them from the sample data files directly
// sampleData.config.ts export const EXPECTED_COUNTS = { users: 15, organizations: 4, posts: 17, events: 17280, venues: 4, recurrenceRules: 100, appUserProfiles: 14, actionItemCategories: 4, agendaCategories: 4 } as const;Then update the test:
+import { EXPECTED_COUNTS } from './sampleData.config'; - expect(userCount).toBe(15); + expect(userCount).toBe(EXPECTED_COUNTS.users); // ... update other assertions similarly
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
package.json(1 hunks)src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts(5 hunks)tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- tsconfig.json
- package.json
- src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/utilities/loadSampleData.spec.ts (2)
1-15: LGTM! Well-structured imports.
The imports are properly organized and include all necessary dependencies for database connectivity, models, and test utilities.
41-41: Verify the large number of events.
The test expects 17,280 events to be created. This seems unusually high for sample data and might impact test performance and database size.
✅ Verification successful
The large number of events (17,280) is expected for recurring events data
After examining the implementation and sample data, the high number of events is justified because:
- The events are recurring events (as seen in the sample event with
"recurring": true) - The sample data appears to be pre-generated to cover recurring events over a period, which is a common practice for testing recurring event functionality
- The data is used only for testing purposes and is not production data
- The implementation in
loadSampleData.tsshows this is properly managed through MongoDB's bulk insert capabilities, so there are no performance concerns
The large number is intentional and appropriate for testing recurring event scenarios comprehensively.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the sample data file to verify event count
fd -t f "events.json" | xargs cat | jq '. | length'
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the test file to understand the context of these events
rg -A 10 "expect\(eventCount\).toBe\(17280\)" tests/
Length of output: 622
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the loadSampleData implementation to understand how these events are generated
rg -B 10 -A 10 "loadSampleData" src/
Length of output: 36
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the loadSampleData file and its implementation
fd loadSampleData
Length of output: 142
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation of loadSampleData
cat src/utilities/loadSampleData.ts
Length of output: 6561
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the events.json sample data file to understand the nature of these events
cat sample_data/events.json | jq -r '. | length, .[0]'
Length of output: 933
| it("should import sample data and verify document counts", async () => { | ||
| execSync("npm run import:sample-data -- --format", { stdio: "inherit" }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve sample data import command execution.
The current implementation has two concerns:
- Using
stdio: "inherit"makes the test output verbose and harder to read - Missing error handling for the import command
- execSync("npm run import:sample-data -- --format", { stdio: "inherit" });
+ try {
+ execSync("npm run import:sample-data -- --format", { stdio: "pipe" });
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to import sample data:', error);
+ throw error;
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it("should import sample data and verify document counts", async () => { | |
| execSync("npm run import:sample-data -- --format", { stdio: "inherit" }); | |
| it("should import sample data and verify document counts", async () => { | |
| try { | |
| execSync("npm run import:sample-data -- --format", { stdio: "pipe" }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to import sample data:', error); | |
| throw error; | |
| } |
|
|
sure |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Fixes: Fixed functionality to load sample data into MongoDB collections and verify document counts.
Issue Number:
Fixes #2796
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes. Added unit tests to verify the sample data import process and document count verification.
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
This PR fixes the functionality to import sample data into MongoDB collections and verifies document counts post-import. Additionally, test cases are provided to validate this functionality. The motivation behind this change is to ensure that data can be easily loaded and verified in development environments, facilitating better testing and consistency.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No, this PR does not introduce any breaking changes till now.
Other information
This change helps with the automated setup of sample data for testing and development, ensuring that the data is accurately imported and can be verified post-import.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Dependencies
@types/nodeto version 22.10.2Utilities
loadSampleDatautility with improved module compatibility and path resolutionlistSampleDatafunction publicly accessibleTesting