add graphql implementation for handling organization membership read/write operations #2728
Conversation
updated drizzle schema to incorporate new changes
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the database schema and GraphQL API, focusing on user and organization management. Key modifications include the update of user roles from "base" to "regular," alterations to foreign key constraints, and the introduction of new input types for organization-related mutations. The GraphQL schema is enhanced with new queries and mutations for managing organizations and memberships, along with refined error handling. Additionally, various utility functions and types are introduced to streamline GraphQL connections and improve overall data integrity. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (94)
src/drizzle/tables/fundraisingCampaigns.ts (1)
57-59: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding documentation for timestamp behavior.
The timestamp handling logic could benefit from a brief comment explaining the NULL → timestamp transition behavior for better maintainability.
updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, }) + // Starts as NULL for new records, automatically set to current timestamp on updates .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.}) // Starts as NULL for new records, automatically set to current timestamp on updates .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),src/drizzle/tables/volunteerGroups.ts (1)
47-49: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider aligning
updatedAtdefault value withcreatedAtThe current implementation sets
updatedAttonullby default, whilecreatedAtusesdefaultNow(). This inconsistency might cause confusion when querying records or maintaining data consistency. Consider using the same default behavior for both timestamp fields.Apply this diff to align the behavior:
updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, }) - .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) + .notNull() + .defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),This change would:
- Ensure both timestamp fields are always populated
- Make it easier to query records based on these fields
- Maintain consistent behavior across the schema
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.}) .notNull() .defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),src/drizzle/tables/agendaItems.ts (1)
45-47: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance position field documentation
While the current documentation is good, consider expanding it to include information about the uniqueness constraints and ordering implications.
/** - * Position of the agenda item relative to other agenda item associated to the same agenda section the agenda item is associated to. + * Position of the agenda item relative to other agenda items within the same section or event. + * Must be unique within: + * - The same event (when sectionId is null) + * - The same section (when sectionId is not null) + * Used to maintain the order of agenda items. */📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Position of the agenda item relative to other agenda items within the same section or event. * Must be unique within: * - The same event (when sectionId is null) * - The same section (when sectionId is not null) * Used to maintain the order of agenda items. */src/drizzle/tables/families.ts (1)
42-44: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent timestamp handling pattern detected
The verification reveals a consistent but problematic pattern across all tables:
updatedAtfields are set tonullby defaultcreatedAtfields are required (notNull) but lack a default valueThis implementation deviates from best practices where:
createdAtshould havedefaultNow()updatedAtshould initially matchcreatedAtinstead of beingnullSuggested fix for both fields:
createdAt: timestamp("created_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, }).defaultNow().notNull() updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, }).defaultNow().$onUpdate(() => new Date()),🔗 Analysis chain
Verify timestamp handling pattern
The current implementation sets
updatedAttonullby default and updates it on record changes. This differs from the common pattern whereupdatedAtinitially matchescreatedAt. Consider the following:
- Is this pattern intentional and consistent across all tables?
- Could this cause issues with queries that rely on
updatedAtbeing non-null?Let's check if this pattern is consistent across other tables:
Consider aligning with the common pattern:
updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, -}).$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) +}).defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check updatedAt field implementation across all table definitions # Expected: Should find similar patterns in other table definitions # Search for updatedAt field definitions rg -A 3 'updatedAt:\s*timestamp\(' 'src/drizzle/tables/'Length of output: 7283
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the default and update behaviors for updatedAt fields rg -A 5 'updatedAt:\s*timestamp\(' 'src/drizzle/tables/' | rg '\$default|\$onUpdate'Length of output: 2199
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check for createdAt field patterns to compare with updatedAt rg -A 3 'createdAt:\s*timestamp\(' 'src/drizzle/tables/' | rg '\$default'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the complete createdAt field definition rg -B 1 -A 5 'createdAt:\s*timestamp\(' 'src/drizzle/tables/families.ts'Length of output: 190
src/graphql/types/User/creator.ts (1)
52-54: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance error logging for better debugging.
The refactoring improves code readability. However, the error logging could be more detailed to help with debugging corrupted data states.
ctx.log.error( - "Postgres select operation returned an empty array for a user's creator user id that isn't null.", + `Postgres select operation returned an empty array for creator ID ${creatorId}. This indicates corrupted data for user ${parent.id}.`, );Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
package.json (1)
34-46:
⚠️ Potential issueAddress missing test coverage
The PR objectives explicitly mention "no tests were added", but this PR implements critical GraphQL functionality for organization membership. Given the updates to testing dependencies (@vitest/coverage-v8, vitest), tests should be added.
Please add:
- Unit tests for the new GraphQL resolvers
- Integration tests for the membership operations
- Schema validation tests
Would you like assistance in generating the test suite structure?
src/drizzle/tables/actions.ts (1)
65-67: 💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistency found in updatedAt timestamp configuration
The implementation in the actions table differs from the consistent pattern used across all other tables in the codebase. All other tables include
withTimezone: truein their updatedAt timestamp configuration, which is missing in the reviewed changes.
src/drizzle/tables/actions.ts: AddwithTimezone: trueto match the timestamp configuration used in all other tables🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Well-implemented timestamp management.
The implementation follows best practices by:
- Setting a default null value using properly escaped SQL
- Automatically updating the timestamp on record modifications
Let's verify if this pattern is consistently applied across other timestamp columns in the database schema:
The previous pattern didn't work well with ast-grep due to the complexity of the expression. Let's try using ripgrep to find timestamp column definitions and examine their patterns across the codebase.
The previous commands might have failed due to incorrect path assumptions. Let's first verify the existence and structure of the drizzle tables directory and then examine the timestamp patterns.
I see a lot of timestamp columns, but let's specifically focus on the
updatedAtconfigurations to verify if they follow the same pattern as the one in the actions table.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in timestamp handling across tables # Expected: Similar patterns of $defaultFn and $onUpdate for updatedAt columns # Search for updatedAt column definitions ast-grep --pattern 'updatedAt: timestamp($$$).$defaultFn($$$).$onUpdate($$$)' # Also check for any updatedAt columns that might not follow this pattern ast-grep --pattern 'updatedAt: timestamp($$$)'Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to find timestamp patterns # First, let's find all Drizzle table definition files fd -e ts -e js drizzle/tables/ --exec sh -c ' echo "=== File: {}" && # Look for timestamp columns and their configurations rg "timestamp\(" -A 3 "{}" 'Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler approach first to find the files fd . src/drizzle/tables/ # Then search for timestamp patterns in all files rg -l "timestamp" src/drizzle/tables/ # Finally, let's look at the actual content of these files # focusing on timestamp-related code rg "timestamp" src/drizzle/tables/ -B 1 -A 2Length of output: 25132
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's specifically look at the updatedAt configurations across tables rg "updatedAt: timestamp\(" -B 0 -A 3 src/drizzle/tables/ --no-filenameLength of output: 3040
src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts (2)
31-31: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Correct the grammatical error in the log message.
The log message contains a grammatical error. Change "a organization's" to "an organization's":
- "Postgres select operation returned an empty array for a organization's creator user id that isn't null.", + "Postgres select operation returned an empty array for an organization's creator user id that isn't null.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."Postgres select operation returned an empty array for an organization's creator user id that isn't null.",
24-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for the database query.
Consider wrapping the database query in a try-catch block to handle potential exceptions, such as database connectivity issues. Currently, if the query fails due to an exception, it will not be caught and may cause the resolver to fail unexpectedly.
Apply this change to enhance error handling:
const creatorId = parent.creatorId; -const creatorUser = await ctx.drizzleClient.query.usersTable.findFirst({ - where: (fields, operators) => operators.eq(fields.id, creatorId), -}); +let creatorUser; +try { + creatorUser = await ctx.drizzleClient.query.usersTable.findFirst({ + where: (fields, operators) => operators.eq(fields.id, creatorId), + }); +} catch (error) { + ctx.log.error("Error fetching creator user from database:", error); + throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ + extensions: { + code: "database_error", + }, + message: "Unable to retrieve creator information at this time.", + }); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.let creatorUser; try { creatorUser = await ctx.drizzleClient.query.usersTable.findFirst({ where: (fields, operators) => operators.eq(fields.id, creatorId), }); } catch (error) { ctx.log.error("Error fetching creator user from database:", error); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "database_error", }, message: "Unable to retrieve creator information at this time.", }); }src/drizzle/tables/posts.ts (4)
68-76: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider the
updatedAtfield behaviorThe current implementation sets
updatedAttonullby default and updates it on changes. This pattern might lead to confusion as:
- A null
updatedAtimplies the record was never updated- But a newly created record might need this field set to match
createdAtConsider this alternative implementation:
-updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { - mode: "date", - precision: 3, - withTimezone: true, -}) - .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) - .$onUpdate(() => new Date()), +updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { + mode: "date", + precision: 3, + withTimezone: true, +}) + .notNull() + .defaultNow() + .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.* Date time at the time the post was last updated. */ updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, }) .notNull() .defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),
45-48:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd a default value for the
isPinnedfieldThe
isPinnedfield is marked asnotNullbut lacks a default value. This could cause issues when migrating existing records or creating new posts.Apply this diff to add a default value:
-isPinned: boolean("is_pinned").notNull(), +isPinned: boolean("is_pinned").notNull().default(false),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Boolean field to tell if the post is pinned. */ isPinned: boolean("is_pinned").notNull().default(false),
143-145: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding validations for other required fields
While the caption validation is good, consider adding validations for other required fields to ensure data integrity at the application level.
Example expansion:
export const postsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema(postsTable, { caption: (schema) => schema.caption.min(1).max(2048), + organizationId: (schema) => schema.organizationId.uuid(), + creatorId: (schema) => schema.creatorId.uuid(), });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
82-88: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding an index for pinned posts queries
With the introduction of the
isPinnedfield, you might want to optimize queries that filter or sort by pinned posts.Add an index for the
isPinnedfield:(self) => [ index().on(self.createdAt), index().on(self.creatorId), index().on(self.organizationId), index().on(self.posterId), + index().on(self.isPinned), ],Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/drizzle/tables/postAttachments.ts (2)
23-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding ON DELETE/UPDATE behavior for foreign keys
The foreign key constraints for
creatorIdandupdaterIddon't specify what happens when the referenced user is deleted or updated. This could lead to orphaned records or inconsistent data.Consider adding appropriate cascade or set null behaviors:
creatorId: uuid("creator_id") - .references(() => usersTable.id, {}) + .references(() => usersTable.id, { onDelete: 'CASCADE', onUpdate: 'CASCADE' }) .notNull(), updaterId: uuid("updater_id") - .references(() => usersTable.id, {}) + .references(() => usersTable.id, { onDelete: 'SET NULL', onUpdate: 'CASCADE' })Also applies to: 49-50
93-98: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance insert schema validation
The current validation only checks for minimum URI length. Consider adding:
- URI format validation
- Maximum length constraints to prevent excessive data
- File type validation based on the
typefieldExample enhancement:
export const postAttachmentsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema( postAttachmentsTable, { - uri: (schema) => schema.uri.min(1), + uri: (schema) => schema.uri.min(1).max(2048).url(), + type: (schema) => schema.type.refine((val) => { + // Validate file type matches the URI extension + return true; // Add your validation logic here + }, "File type must match the URI extension"), }, );Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/utilities/getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.ts (5)
1-3: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add documentation for the
Paths<T>type.The recursive type definition would benefit from documentation explaining its purpose and structure, especially given its complexity.
Add JSDoc comment:
+/** + * Recursively constructs a union type of all possible key paths in an object type T. + * Each path is represented as a tuple of keys from root to leaf. + */ type Paths<T> = T extends object ? { [K in keyof T]: [K, ...Paths<T[K]>] | [K] }[keyof T] : never;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Recursively constructs a union type of all possible key paths in an object type T. * Each path is represented as a tuple of keys from root to leaf. */ type Paths<T> = T extends object ? { [K in keyof T]: [K, ...Paths<T[K]>] | [K] }[keyof T] : never;
8-16: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding input validation and more specific types.
The current type constraint
Record<string, unknown>is very permissive. Consider adding runtime validation and more specific types.export const getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues = < - T extends Record<string, unknown>, + T extends Record<string, unknown> = Record<string, unknown>, >({ keyPaths, object, }: { keyPaths: Paths<T>[]; object: T; -}): Paths<T>[] => { +}): Paths<T>[] => { + if (!Array.isArray(keyPaths)) { + throw new TypeError('keyPaths must be an array'); + } + if (!object || typeof object !== 'object') { + throw new TypeError('object must be a non-null object'); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues = < T extends Record<string, unknown> = Record<string, unknown>, >({ keyPaths, object, }: { keyPaths: Paths<T>[]; object: T; }): Paths<T>[] => { if (!Array.isArray(keyPaths)) { throw new TypeError('keyPaths must be an array'); } if (!object || typeof object !== 'object') { throw new TypeError('object must be a non-null object'); }
20-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add explanation for the lint ignore and consider removing
anytype.The lint ignore comment lacks explanation and the
anytype could be avoided.- // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: <explanation> - const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: any, key) => { + const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: unknown, key: keyof T) => {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
5-7: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance function documentation with params, return type, and examples.
The current documentation could be more comprehensive to help users understand the function's usage.
Replace with:
-/** - * This function takes in a javascript object and a list of key paths within that object as arguments and outputs all paths amongst those key paths that correspond to a non-undefined value. - */ +/** + * Filters an array of key paths to only include those that lead to defined values in the given object. + * + * @param options - The input options + * @param options.keyPaths - Array of key paths to check + * @param options.object - The object to traverse + * @returns Array of key paths that lead to defined values + * + * @example + * const obj = { a: { b: 1, c: undefined } }; + * const paths = [['a', 'b'], ['a', 'c']]; + * getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues({ keyPaths: paths, object: obj }) + * // Returns: [['a', 'b']] + */📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Filters an array of key paths to only include those that lead to defined values in the given object. * * @param options - The input options * @param options.keyPaths - Array of key paths to check * @param options.object - The object to traverse * @returns Array of key paths that lead to defined values * * @example * const obj = { a: { b: 1, c: undefined } }; * const paths = [['a', 'b'], ['a', 'c']]; * getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues({ keyPaths: paths, object: obj }) * // Returns: [['a', 'b']] */
17-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider performance optimization for large objects.
For large objects with many paths, consider caching intermediate results to avoid redundant traversals.
export const getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues = < T extends Record<string, unknown>, >({ keyPaths, object, }: { keyPaths: Paths<T>[]; object: T; }): Paths<T>[] => { const keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues: Paths<T>[] = []; + const cache = new Map<string, unknown>(); for (const keyPath of keyPaths) { - const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: any, key) => { + const pathString = keyPath.join('.'); + if (cache.has(pathString)) { + if (cache.get(pathString) !== undefined) { + keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.push(keyPath); + } + continue; + } + + const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: unknown, key: keyof T) => { return accumulator && accumulator[key] !== undefined ? accumulator[key] : undefined; }, object); + cache.set(pathString, value); if (value !== undefined) { keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.push(keyPath); } } return keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues; };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues: Paths<T>[] = []; const cache = new Map<string, unknown>(); for (const keyPath of keyPaths) { const pathString = keyPath.join('.'); if (cache.has(pathString)) { if (cache.get(pathString) !== undefined) { keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.push(keyPath); } continue; } // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: <explanation> const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: unknown, key: keyof T) => { return accumulator && accumulator[key] !== undefined ? accumulator[key] : undefined; }, object); cache.set(pathString, value); if (value !== undefined) { keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.push(keyPath); } } return keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues; };src/drizzle/tables/tags.ts (2)
120-124:
⚠️ Potential issueCheck for potential circular relationships in
parentTagFolderThe self-referential relationship in
parentTagFoldercould lead to circular references if not managed properly. Ensure there's logic in place to prevent tags from becoming their own ancestors, which could cause issues with recursive queries or data integrity.
96-96: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Reconsider including
isFolderin the unique indexIncluding the boolean field
isFolderin the unique index withnameandorganizationIdmay lead to unintended uniqueness constraints. SinceisFolderhas only two possible values, it might be unnecessary and could limit the creation of tags with the same name and organization but differentisFolderstatuses.Consider updating the unique index:
-uniqueIndex().on(self.isFolder, self.name, self.organizationId), +uniqueIndex().on(self.name, self.organizationId),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.uniqueIndex().on(self.name, self.organizationId),src/drizzle/tables/commentVotes.ts (2)
65-65: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Inconsistent column name 'updated_id'
The column name
"updated_id"for theupdaterIdfield may be inconsistent with the naming convention. Consider renaming it to"updater_id"to match the field nameupdaterIdand maintain consistency.Apply this diff to rename the column:
- updaterId: uuid("updated_id").references(() => usersTable.id, { + updaterId: uuid("updater_id").references(() => usersTable.id, {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.updaterId: uuid("updater_id").references(() => usersTable.id, {
50-50:
⚠️ Potential issueTypo in 'commmentVoteTypeEnum'
The enum
commmentVoteTypeEnumseems to have an extra 'm' in 'comment'. It should becommentVoteTypeEnum.Apply this diff to correct the typo:
- import { commmentVoteTypeEnum } from "~/src/drizzle/enums/commentVoteType"; + import { commentVoteTypeEnum } from "~/src/drizzle/enums/commentVoteType"; ... - type: commmentVoteTypeEnum("type").notNull(), + type: commentVoteTypeEnum("type").notNull(),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/drizzle/tables/users.ts (4)
287-291: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Standardize 'relationName' formats in relationship definitions
There is an inconsistency in the
relationNameformat between thecreatorandupdaterrelationships. In thecreatorrelationship:relationName: "users.creator_id:users.id",But in the
updaterrelationship:relationName: "users.id:users.updater_id",For clarity and maintainability, consider standardizing the
relationNameformat across all relationships.Apply this diff to correct the
relationNamein theupdaterrelationship:- relationName: "users.id:users.updater_id", + relationName: "users.updater_id:users.id",Also applies to: 499-503
552-554: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Ensure consistency in 'relationName' for 'volunteerGroupsWhereUpdater' relationship
The
relationNameforvolunteerGroupsWhereUpdateris specified as"users.id:volunteer_groups.updater_id", which differs from the pattern used in other relationships. For consistency, consider updating it to"volunteer_groups.updater_id:users.id".Apply this diff:
- relationName: "users.id:volunteer_groups.updater_id", + relationName: "volunteer_groups.updater_id:users.id",Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
580-580:
⚠️ Potential issueAdjust validation to allow optional 'avatarURI' field
The validation schema for
avatarURIenforces.min(1), requiring at least one character. SinceavatarURIis optional in the database schema (not marked asnotNull()), this validation will cause errors ifavatarURIis not provided. To allow optional values while still enforcing minimum length when provided, mark the field as optional.Apply this diff to adjust the validation:
- avatarURI: (schema) => schema.avatarURI.min(1), + avatarURI: (schema) => schema.avatarURI.optional().min(1),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.avatarURI: (schema) => schema.avatarURI.optional().min(1),
160-161: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider setting a default value for 'updatedAt'
Currently, the
updatedAtfield defaults tonulland updates to the current date on record update. Typically, it's advantageous to initializeupdatedAtwith the creation timestamp to avoidnullvalues, which can simplify queries and data handling.Apply this diff to set
updatedAtto default to the current timestamp:- .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) + .defaultNow()📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),src/drizzle/tables/postVotes.ts (2)
60-61:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential issue with default value for
updatedAtfieldThe
updatedAtfield is set with a default function that assignsnull:.$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`)Setting the default to
nullmight introduce unexpectednullvalues in yourupdatedAtcolumn for new records. Typically,updatedAtfields are initialized to the current timestamp upon creation and updated on modification.Consider setting the default to
now()to have a non-null timestamp on creation:- .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) + .defaultNow()
65-68:
⚠️ Potential issueTypo in column name: use
updater_idinstead ofupdated_idThe database column name for
updaterIdis defined as"updated_id", which seems to be a typo. It should likely be"updater_id"to match the intended field and ensure consistency.Apply this diff to correct the column name:
- updaterId: uuid("updated_id").references(() => usersTable.id, { + updaterId: uuid("updater_id").references(() => usersTable.id, {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.updaterId: uuid("updater_id").references(() => usersTable.id, { onDelete: "set null", onUpdate: "cascade", }),src/drizzle/tables/organizations.ts (5)
17-19: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Good addition of JSDoc comment for clarity
Including a JSDoc comment for the
organizationsTableenhances code readability and maintainability.
181-192: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Include
countryCodein the insert schemaThe
countryCodefield is defined in the table but not included in theorganizationsTableInsertSchema. IfcountryCodeis required or needs validation, consider adding it to the insert schema to ensure data integrity.Example:
{ + countryCode: (schema) => schema.countryCode, address: (schema) => schema.address.optional().min(1).max(1024), // rest of the fields... }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
84-85: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review default and update functions for
updatedAtThe use of
.$defaultFn(() => sql\${null}`)sets the default value ofupdatedAttonull, and.$onUpdate(() => new Date())updates it with the current date on modification. Consider whether initializingupdatedAttonull` is necessary or if it would be more consistent to default it to the current timestamp.You can simplify the default function and ensure consistency by setting
updatedAtto the current timestamp by default:}) - .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),Alternatively, use SQL functions for database consistency:
}) - .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) - .$onUpdate(() => new Date()), + .defaultNow() + .$onUpdate(() => sql`CURRENT_TIMESTAMP`),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..$onUpdate(() => new Date()),.defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => sql`CURRENT_TIMESTAMP`),
185-185: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add maximum length validation for
avatarURICurrently,
avatarURIhas a minimum length validation but no maximum length. To prevent excessively long URIs, consider adding a maximum length constraint.For example:
avatarURI: (schema) => schema.avatarURI.optional().min(1).max(2048),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
184-191: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Adjust validation for optional fields in insert schema
Fields such as
address,avatarURI,city,description,postalCode, andstateare not marked asnotNull()in the table definition, indicating they are optional. However, in the insert schema, using.min(1)requires these fields to have at least one character, making them effectively mandatory. To reflect their optional nature, consider updating the insert schema to allowundefinedornullvalues.You can adjust the schema as follows:
address: (schema) => schema.address.optional().min(1).max(1024), -avatarURI: (schema) => schema.avatarURI.min(1), +avatarURI: (schema) => schema.avatarURI.optional().min(1), city: (schema) => schema.city.optional().min(1).max(64), description: (schema) => schema.description.optional().min(1).max(2048), postalCode: (schema) => schema.postalCode.optional().min(1).max(32), state: (schema) => schema.state.optional().min(1).max(64),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/utilities/defaultGraphQLConnection.ts (6)
132-133: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fix typographical error in JSDoc comment
There's a typo in the documentation comment. The word "connnection" should be corrected to "connection" to ensure clarity.
249-253:
⚠️ Potential issueVerify the assignment of 'startCursor' and 'endCursor'
Currently,
endCursoris assigned the cursor of the first edge, andstartCursoris assigned the cursor of the last edge. Typically,startCursorshould reference the first edge, andendCursorshould reference the last edge. Please verify if this assignment aligns with the expected pagination behavior.
7-10: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add missing description for 'cursor' in JSDoc comment
The JSDoc comment for the
cursorfield is empty. Providing a clear description enhances maintainability and helps other developers understand its purpose.Apply this diff to add the description:
/** + * The cursor representing the position in the connection. */ cursor?: Cursor | undefined;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * The cursor representing the position in the connection. */ cursor?: Cursor | undefined;
221-221:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid mutating 'rawNodes' when reversing the array
Using
rawNodes.reverse()mutates the original array, which could lead to unintended side effects ifrawNodesis used elsewhere. To prevent this, create a copy of the array before reversing it.Apply this diff to avoid mutating the original array:
- for (const rawNode of rawNodes.reverse()) { + for (const rawNode of [...rawNodes].reverse()) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for (const rawNode of [...rawNodes].reverse()) {
105-116: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Simplify error message for missing 'first' and 'last' arguments
When neither
firstnorlastis provided, the current implementation adds two separate issues. Consider combining them into a single error message to improve clarity, indicating that one offirstorlastmust be provided.Apply this diff to combine the error messages:
} else { - ctx.addIssue({ - code: "custom", - message: `A non-null value for argument "first" must be provided.`, - path: ["first"], - }); - ctx.addIssue({ - code: "custom", - message: `A non-null value for argument "last" must be provided.`, - path: ["last"], - }); + ctx.addIssue({ + code: "custom", + message: `One of "first" or "last" must be provided with a non-null value.`, + path: ["first", "last"], + }); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ctx.addIssue({ code: "custom", message: `One of "first" or "last" must be provided with a non-null value.`, path: ["first", "last"], }); }
16-22: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider renaming 'isInversed' to 'isReversed' for clarity
The term
isInversedmay be less common in this context. Renaming it toisReversedcan improve readability and align with standard terminology.Apply this diff to update the terminology:
/** * This field is used to identify whether the client wants to traverse the GraphQL connection edges in the default order or in the inversed order. * * @example * An example would be scrolling on Twitter's home page (assuming they're using GraphQL connections for fetching array-like data). When scrolling down, the GraphQL connection traversal is the default, and when scrolling up, the GraphQL connection traversal is inversed. */ - isInversed: boolean; + isReversed: boolean;Remember to update all instances of
isInversedthroughout the codebase accordingly.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/User/updatedAt.ts (1)
26-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider refining error handling when current user is not found
When
currentUserisundefined(lines 26-33), you're throwing an "unauthenticated" error with the message "Only authenticated users can perform this action." Since the user is authenticated but not found in the database, it might be more appropriate to throw an error with code"forbidden_action"or"unexpected"to reflect that the user's account may no longer exist or there's a database inconsistency.Apply this diff to update the error code:
if (currentUser === undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", + code: "forbidden_action", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (currentUser === undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "forbidden_action", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }src/graphql/types/Organization/updatedAt.ts (2)
32-39: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider refining error handling when current user is not found
When
currentUserisundefined(lines 32-39), you're throwing an "unauthenticated" error. Given that the client is authenticated but the user record isn't found, it might be more appropriate to throw an error with code"forbidden_action"to reflect that the user may not have access or there is a potential issue with their account.Apply this diff to update the error code:
if (currentUser === undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", + code: "forbidden_action", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (currentUser === undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "forbidden_action", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }
16-16:
⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in error message
The error message on line 16 states, "Only authenticated organizations can perform this action." Since organizations cannot authenticate, this should be corrected to "Only authenticated users can perform this action."
Apply this diff to fix the error message:
message: "Only authenticated organizations can perform this action.", message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.",Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Organization/updater.ts (2)
16-16:
⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in error message
The error message on line 16 says, "Only authenticated organizations can perform this action." Since only users can authenticate, this should be corrected to "Only authenticated users can perform this action."
Apply this diff to fix the error message:
message: "Only authenticated organizations can perform this action.", message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.",Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
38-45: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarify error code and message for forbidden action
When
currentUserisundefined(lines 38-45), you're throwing an error with code"forbidden_action"and the message "Only authenticated users can perform this action." This might be confusing since the error code suggests a forbidden action while the message indicates an authentication issue. Consider aligning the error code and message to reflect the actual issue.Apply this diff to update the error code:
throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { - code: "forbidden_action", + code: "unauthenticated", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (currentUser === undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }src/graphql/types/Mutation/deleteOrganization.ts (1)
64-71: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider refining error handling when current user is not found
When
currentUserisundefined(lines 64-71), you're throwing an "unauthenticated" error. Since the client is authenticated but the user record isn't found, it may be more accurate to throw an error with code"forbidden_action"or"unexpected"to indicate a potential issue with the user's account or database inconsistency.Apply this diff to update the error code:
if (currentUser === undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", + code: "forbidden_action", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (currentUser === undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "forbidden_action", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }src/drizzle/tables/tagAssignments.ts (2)
78-79: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Optimize Primary Key Definition
The primary key is set using
primaryKeywith columns[self.assigneeId, self.tagId]. Ensure that this composite key aligns with your access patterns and indexing strategy.Consider defining a single
idprimary key and adding a unique constraint instead.
62-63:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential Issue with Default Function for
updatedAtUsing
$defaultFn(() => sql\${null}`)forupdatedAt` may not initialize the field as expected. Consider setting a proper default or allowing it to be nullable.Apply this diff to set
updatedAtas nullable without a default function:updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, }) - .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) + .default(null) .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateOrganization.ts (4)
73-80: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Authorization Check May Be Too Restrictive
Currently, only users with the role
administratorcan update organizations. Consider whether other roles should have update permissions, or implement a more granular permission system.Evaluate the roles and permissions model to allow roles like
organization_ownerormanagerto perform updates.
98-111: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarify Error Message for Resource Not Found
The error message indicates that no associated resources were found but does not specify that the organization ID may be invalid.
Enhance the error message to inform the user that the organization may not exist.
27-34: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Authentication Error Handling
The error message and code for unauthenticated access are correctly implemented. However, consider adding logging for unauthorized access attempts.
Add logging to record unauthorized access attempts:
if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { + ctx.log.warn('Unauthenticated access attempt to updateOrganization mutation'); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { ctx.log.warn('Unauthenticated access attempt to updateOrganization mutation'); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }
82-96:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential Null Values in Update Operation
If fields in
parsedArgs.inputare optional, updating with undefined values may overwrite existing data with null. Ensure that only provided fields are updated.Modify the update operation to exclude undefined fields:
const [updatedOrganization] = await ctx.drizzleClient .update(organizationsTable) .set({ - address: parsedArgs.input.address, - avatarURI: parsedArgs.input.avatarURI, - city: parsedArgs.input.city, - countryCode: parsedArgs.input.countryCode, - description: parsedArgs.input.description, - name: parsedArgs.input.name, - postalCode: parsedArgs.input.postalCode, - state: parsedArgs.input.state, + ...parsedArgs.input, updaterId: currentUserId, })Alternatively, filter out undefined values from
parsedArgs.inputbefore passing to.set().Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/drizzle/tables/comments.ts (3)
79-80:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential Issue with Default Function for
updatedAtAs with
tagAssignments.ts, ensure that the default function forupdatedAtinitializes correctly.Refer to the solution provided earlier for
updatedAt.
53-56:
⚠️ Potential issueInitialization of
isPinnedandpinnedAtFieldsThe
isPinnedfield is non-nullable but does not have a default value. Similarly,pinnedAtmay need a default or be nullable based on how pinning is handled.Set a default value for
isPinnedand clarify the handling ofpinnedAt:isPinned: boolean("is_pinned") + .notNull() + .default(false),Ensure
pinnedAtis nullable if a comment is not pinned upon creation.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
22-28: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider Enforcing Non-null on
commenterIdThe
commenterIdfield lacks.notNull(). If comments must have a commenter, consider making this field non-nullable.Apply this diff to enforce non-nullability:
commenterId: uuid("commenter_id") + .notNull() .references(() => usersTable.id, { onDelete: "set null", onUpdate: "cascade", }),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Mutation/createOrganization.ts (4)
72-79: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review Authorization Logic
Restricting organization creation to
administratorrole may not be sufficient. Consider whether other roles should have this capability.Implement a roles and permissions system that aligns with organizational policies.
118-129: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Handle Unexpected Insertion Failures Gracefully
While logging the error is good, consider retry mechanisms or more informative error messages to assist debugging.
Review the database transaction and connectivity to prevent such unexpected failures.
27-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add Logging for Unauthenticated Access
Similar to
updateOrganization, consider logging unauthenticated access attempts.if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { + ctx.log.warn('Unauthenticated access attempt to createOrganization mutation'); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ctx.log.warn('Unauthenticated access attempt to createOrganization mutation'); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", }); }
87-101:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove Uniqueness Check for Organization Names
The current check for existing organization names is case-sensitive. This might allow duplicate names with different cases.
Modify the query to be case-insensitive:
where: (fields, operators) => - operators.eq(fields.name, parsedArgs.input.name), + operators.ilike(fields.name, parsedArgs.input.name),Ensure that the database enforces uniqueness constraints appropriately.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Organization/members.ts (3)
21-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Error Handling in Cursor Parsing
While the code handles parsing errors, consider providing more user-friendly messages and possibly guiding the user on how to obtain a valid cursor.
Enhance the error message to include instructions.
94-173: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Simplify Complex Conditional Logic
The
whereclause construction is complex and may be hard to maintain.Consider refactoring the conditional logic into smaller, reusable functions or using a query builder that simplifies cursor pagination.
190-203: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Improve Error Feedback on Empty Results
When no memberships are found, the error thrown is generic. It may be clearer to inform the user that there are no more members in the given direction.
Adjust the error message to be more specific about pagination limits.
src/graphql/types/User/organizationsMemberOf.ts (2)
148-148:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent Comparison with Parent ID
At line 148, you have
eq(organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, parent.id). Sinceparent.idrefers to the user ID in this context, comparing it toorganizationIdmight be incorrect. For consistency with prior conditions, you should compareorganizationMembershipsTable.memberIdtoparent.id.Apply this diff to correct the field:
- eq(organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, parent.id), + eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id),
140-144:
⚠️ Potential issuePossible Incorrect Field in Comparison
In the
whereclause starting at line 140, you are comparingorganizationMembershipsTable.memberIdtocursor.organizationId. This may be a typo. It seems you intended to compareorganizationMembershipsTable.organizationIdtocursor.organizationIdto correctly filter by organization ID.Apply this diff to correct the field:
- eq( - organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, - cursor.organizationId, - ), + eq( + organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, + cursor.organizationId, + ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), eq( organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, cursor.organizationId, ),src/graphql/types/Organization/index.ts (1)
1-5: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Well-structured organization type setup.
The Organization type includes all essential fields needed for the GraphQL implementation of organization membership operations. The structure follows the established pattern of separating concerns into individual files.
Consider maintaining this pattern for future type additions:
- Base type definition (Organization.ts)
- Relationship fields (creator.ts, members.ts)
- Metadata fields (updatedAt.ts, updater.ts)
src/graphql/enums/OrganizationMembershipRole.ts (2)
1-10: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding value descriptions and deprecation strategy
The enum implementation looks good, but could be enhanced with:
- Individual value descriptions
- A deprecation strategy for future role changes
Here's an enhanced implementation:
export const OrganizationMembershipRole = builder.enumType("OrganizationMembershipRole", { description: "Defines the role of a user within an organization", values: { administrator: { value: "administrator", description: "Has full management rights for the organization" }, regular: { value: "regular", description: "Has standard member privileges within the organization" } } });
7-7: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add enum description for better API documentation
The empty description field should be populated to provide context for API consumers about the purpose and usage of these roles.
- description: "", + description: "Defines the role of a user within an organization. 'administrator' has full management rights, while 'regular' represents standard membership privileges.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Defines the role of a user within an organization. 'administrator' has full management rights, while 'regular' represents standard membership privileges.",src/graphql/builder.ts (1)
2-2: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider documenting Relay implementation strategy
Adding Relay support is a significant architectural change. While the implementation is correct, it would be beneficial to document:
- The rationale for adding Relay
- Which Relay patterns (e.g., connections, nodes) will be used
- Migration strategy for existing queries/mutations
Also applies to: 13-14
src/graphql/types/Mutation/index.ts (1)
2-3: 💡 Codebase verification
⚠️ Potential issueMissing test coverage for organization-related mutations
Based on the test file structure in the repository, there are tests for user-related mutations (
createUser,updateUser, etc.) but no corresponding tests for the new organization-related mutations. Following the established testing pattern intest/routes/graphql/Mutation/, test files should be added for:
test/routes/graphql/Mutation/createOrganization.test.tstest/routes/graphql/Mutation/createOrganizationMembership.test.tstest/routes/graphql/Mutation/deleteOrganization.test.tstest/routes/graphql/Mutation/updateOrganization.test.tstest/routes/graphql/Mutation/deleteOrganizationMembership.test.tstest/routes/graphql/Mutation/updateOrganizationMembership.test.ts🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage for new organization mutations
The PR description indicates no tests were added. Given these new mutations handle critical organization operations, we should ensure proper test coverage.
Please add test cases for:
- Organization CRUD operations
- Membership management operations
- Error scenarios and edge cases
Also applies to: 6-7, 11-12
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for existing test files for the new mutations fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts createOrganization fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts deleteOrganization fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts updateOrganization fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts "OrganizationMembership.*test"Length of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for test files in the repository fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts # Also search for test patterns in TypeScript files rg -l "describe|test\(" -g "*.test.ts" -g "*.spec.ts" # Search for test directory structure fd -t d "test|tests|__tests__" # Look for Jest configuration fd "jest.config"Length of output: 1354
src/graphql/inputs/index.ts (1)
1-13: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider grouping related imports
While the functionality is correct, consider organizing imports by domain (organization, user, etc.) for better maintainability.
+ // Organization-related inputs import "./MutationCreateOrganizationInput"; import "./MutationCreateOrganizationMembershipInput"; import "./MutationDeleteOrganizationInput"; import "./MutationDeleteOrganizationMembershipInput"; import "./MutationUpdateOrganizationInput"; import "./MutationUpdateOrganizationMembershipInput"; import "./QueryOrganizationInput"; + // User-related inputs import "./MutationCreateUserInput"; import "./MutationDeleteUserInput"; import "./MutationSignUpInput"; import "./MutationUpdateCurrentUserInput"; import "./MutationUpdateUserInput"; import "./QuerySignInInput"; import "./QueryUserInput";Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/inputs/QueryOrganizationInput.ts (2)
16-19: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using
t.id()instead oft.string().Since this field represents a unique identifier, using
t.id()would be more semantically correct and consistent with GraphQL best practices.- id: t.string({ + id: t.id({ description: "Global id of the organization.", required: true, }),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.id: t.id({ description: "Global id of the organization.", required: true, }),
14-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a descriptive comment for the input type.
The description field is empty. Add a clear description of the input type's purpose and usage.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for querying a single organization by its ID.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for querying a single organization by its ID.",src/graphql/inputs/MutationDeleteOrganizationInput.ts (2)
14-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a descriptive comment for the input type.
The description field is empty. Add a clear description of the input type's purpose and usage.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for deleting an organization. Note: This operation requires administrator privileges.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for deleting an organization. Note: This operation requires administrator privileges.",
5-7: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding soft delete support.
Given that organization deletion is a critical operation, consider adding a
forceboolean field to support soft deletion by default.export const mutationDeleteOrganizationInputSchema = z.object({ id: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.id.unwrap(), + force: z.boolean().optional().default(false), });This would require corresponding changes in the input type definition and mutation handler.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/inputs/MutationDeleteOrganizationMembershipInput.ts (1)
16-16: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a description for the input type.
The description field is empty. Consider adding a meaningful description to improve API documentation.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for deleting an organization membership.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for deleting an organization membership.",src/graphql/inputs/MutationCreateOrganizationMembershipInput.ts (1)
21-21: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a description for the input type.
The description field is empty. Consider adding a meaningful description to improve API documentation.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for creating an organization membership.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for creating an organization membership.",src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateOrganizationMembershipInput.ts (2)
28-28: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a description for the input type.
The description field is empty. Consider adding a meaningful description to improve API documentation.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for updating an organization membership role.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for updating an organization membership role.",
15-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify and improve the refinement logic.
The current refinement logic has room for improvement:
- It spreads remaining arguments but only
roleis optional- The error message could be more specific
.refine( - ({ memberId, organizationId, ...remainingArg }) => - Object.values(remainingArg).some((value) => value !== undefined), + ({ role }) => role !== undefined, { - message: "At least one optional argument must be provided.", + message: "The role field must be provided for updates.", }, );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..refine( ({ role }) => role !== undefined, { message: "The role field must be provided for updates.", }, );src/drizzle/tables/venueBookings.ts (1)
36-38: 💡 Codebase verification
Timestamp management changes appear to be scope creep
Looking at the PR changes and the organizations table, we can see that:
- The PR is focused on organization membership operations (new mutations and inputs)
- The organizations table already has the same timestamp pattern (
$defaultFn(() => sql\${null}`) and$onUpdate`)- The venue bookings timestamp change is not part of a broader schema update in this PR
The modification to venue bookings'
updatedAtfield, while technically correct, should be moved to a separate PR focused on schema consistency.🔗 Analysis chain
Technically sound, but seems unrelated to PR scope
The
updatedAtfield modifications follow good practices for timestamp management. However, these changes to venue bookings appear unrelated to the PR's stated objective of implementing organization membership operations.Let's check if this is part of a broader schema update:
The previous search might have failed due to escape sequences. Let's try a broader approach to understand the schema changes and see if there's a pattern of timestamp management being implemented across tables.
Let's try a different strategy to understand if this is part of a broader schema change pattern.
The previous search revealed several schema files. Since this PR is about organization membership, let's check the organizations table structure and the scope of changes in this PR to understand if this timestamp modification is part of a broader pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar updatedAt field modifications across the codebase rg -l ".\$defaultFn\(\(\) => sql\`\$\{null\}\`\)" --type tsLength of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a broader search for schema changes in the PR # First, let's look for all table definitions fd "tables" --type f --extension ts --exec cat {} # Also search for updatedAt field patterns with different syntax rg --type ts "updatedAt.*defaultFn|updatedAt.*onUpdate" -A 2Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler approach to find table definitions and timestamp patterns rg -l "createTable|schema" --type ts # Then look for any recent changes to schema files git diff HEAD~1 -- "*.ts" | grep -A 5 -B 5 "updatedAt"Length of output: 919
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's examine the content of the organizations table since this PR is about organization membership cat src/drizzle/tables/organizations.ts # And check if there are any other files modified in this PR git diff --name-only HEAD~1Length of output: 6379
src/graphql/types/Organization/Organization.ts (2)
19-20: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Maintain consistency in field descriptions
The descriptions use different verbs for the same concept:
- "exists in" vs. "resides in" for location-related fields
city: t.exposeString("city", { - description: "Name of the city where the organization exists in.", + description: "Name of the city where the organization resides in.", }), // ... state: t.exposeString("state", { - description: "Name of the state the organization exists in.", + description: "Name of the state where the organization resides in.", }),Also applies to: 44-45
9-11: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a type-level description for the Organization type
The Organization type is missing a description that explains its purpose and usage in the GraphQL schema.
Organization.implement({ - description: "", + description: "Represents an organization entity with its associated properties and metadata.", fields: (t) => ({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Organization.implement({ description: "Represents an organization entity with its associated properties and metadata.", fields: (t) => ({src/graphql/inputs/MutationCreateOrganizationInput.ts (2)
21-49: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding field validations
The input type could benefit from additional validations:
- Length constraints for text fields (name, description, etc.)
- Format validation for postalCode
- Required fields for essential information (e.g., address, city)
Example implementation:
fields: (t) => ({ address: t.string({ description: "Address of the organization.", validate: { minLength: 1, maxLength: 255 }, required: true, }), // ... similar validations for other fields postalCode: t.string({ description: "Postal code of the organization.", validate: { regex: /^[A-Z0-9]{3,10}$/i, message: "Invalid postal code format", }, }), // ... })
20-21: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a description for the input type
The input type is missing a description that explains its purpose and usage in mutations.
.implement({ - description: "", + description: "Input type for creating a new organization with the required fields and metadata.", fields: (t) => ({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for creating a new organization with the required fields and metadata.", fields: (t) => ({src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateOrganizationInput.ts (2)
33-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a meaningful description for the input type
The description field is currently empty. Consider adding a description that explains the purpose of this input type.
6-26: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding field-level validations
The schema correctly ensures at least one field is provided, but consider adding specific validations for:
- Postal code format
- State/province format
- Address length limits
- Name length limits and allowed characters
Example enhancement:
export const mutationUpdateOrganizationInputSchema = organizationsTableInsertSchema .omit({ createdAt: true, creatorId: true, id: true, name: true, updatedAt: true, updaterId: true, }) .extend({ id: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.id.unwrap(), - name: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.name.optional(), + name: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.name.optional() + .refine( + (val) => !val || (val.length >= 2 && val.length <= 100), + "Organization name must be between 2 and 100 characters" + ), + postalCode: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.postalCode.optional() + .refine( + (val) => !val || /^[A-Z0-9-\s]{3,10}$/i.test(val), + "Invalid postal code format" + ), })Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/drizzle/tables/volunteerGroupAssignments.ts (1)
1-1: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding tests for the GraphQL implementation
The PR description mentions that no tests were added. Given that this implements critical organization membership operations, consider adding:
- Unit tests for the input validation schema
- Integration tests for the GraphQL mutations
- Test cases for timestamp handling behavior
Would you like help creating a test plan or generating test cases for these components?
src/drizzle/tables/advertisementAttachments.ts (1)
95-100: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider additional URI validation rules
The current schema only validates for minimum length. Consider adding:
- URL format validation
- Maximum length constraints
- Allowed protocols/domains
export const advertisementAttachmentsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema( advertisementAttachmentsTable, { - uri: (schema) => schema.uri.min(1), + uri: (schema) => schema.uri + .min(1) + .max(2048) + .url() + .regex(/^(https?:\/\/)/), }, );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const advertisementAttachmentsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema( advertisementAttachmentsTable, { uri: (schema) => schema.uri .min(1) .max(2048) .url() .regex(/^(https?:\/\/)/), }, );src/graphql/types/User/User.ts (2)
10-10:
⚠️ Potential issueCritical Security Issue: Exposing passwordHash in User type
The User type now includes the
passwordHashfield by removing theOmittype. This could potentially expose sensitive password data through GraphQL queries.Apply this diff to exclude the
passwordHashfield:-export type User = typeof usersTable.$inferSelect; +export type User = Omit<typeof usersTable.$inferSelect, "passwordHash">;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export type User = Omit<typeof usersTable.$inferSelect, "passwordHash">;
35-37: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the usage of
updatedAtin the codebase.The removal of
updatedAtfield will cause breaking changesThe
updatedAtfield is actively being used in GraphQL queries and type definitions:
- There's an explicit GraphQL query
Query_user_updatedAtthat specifically requests this field- The field is part of the User type definition in the GraphQL schema
- The field appears to be used in type definitions and query documents
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the removal of updatedAt field
The
updatedAtfield has been removed from the User type. Please verify that this removal doesn't break any existing queries or frontend components that might depend on this field.
Let me check the actual content of these files to understand the usage of
updatedAtin the GraphQL queries.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any usage of updatedAt in GraphQL queries/mutations rg -l "updatedAt.*User" --type tsLength of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of files that use updatedAt with User rg "updatedAt.*User" --type ts -C 2Length of output: 13957
src/drizzle/tables/organizationMemberships.ts (1)
115-117: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding validation rules to the insert schema
The insert schema could benefit from additional validation rules for specific fields.
Consider adding validation like this:
export const organizationMembershipsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema( organizationMembershipsTable, + { + role: (schema) => schema.role.refine((val) => + ["ADMIN", "MEMBER"].includes(val), + "Invalid role" + ), + } );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const organizationMembershipsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema( organizationMembershipsTable, { role: (schema) => schema.role.refine((val) => ["ADMIN", "MEMBER"].includes(val), "Invalid role" ), } );src/drizzle/tables/advertisements.ts (1)
146-152: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider additional validation rules for dates
While the validation for name and description fields is good, consider adding validation for date fields.
Consider adding these validations:
export const advertisementsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema( advertisementsTable, { description: (schema) => schema.description.min(1).max(2048), name: (schema) => schema.name.min(1).max(256), + startAt: (schema) => schema.startAt.refine( + (date) => date > new Date(), + "Start date must be in the future" + ), + endAt: (schema) => schema.endAt.refine( + (date, ctx) => date > ctx.startAt, + "End date must be after start date" + ), }, );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const advertisementsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema( advertisementsTable, { description: (schema) => schema.description.min(1).max(2048), name: (schema) => schema.name.min(1).max(256), startAt: (schema) => schema.startAt.refine( (date) => date > new Date(), "Start date must be in the future" ), endAt: (schema) => schema.endAt.refine( (date, ctx) => date > ctx.startAt, "End date must be after start date" ), }, );drizzle_migrations/20241128233353_cloudy_azazel.sql (1)
500-514: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Foreign key constraints are well structured!
The updated constraints properly handle cascading deletes and updates, improving referential integrity. The pattern is consistent across related tables.
Consider adding a comment block at the top of the migration file documenting the rationale for the CASCADE and SET NULL choices.
Also applies to: 566-584, 590-608, 758-776, 782-788
drizzle_migrations/meta/20241128233353_snapshot.json (1)
790-791: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review cascading delete behavior changes
The changes to foreign key constraints introduce cascading deletes and updates across multiple relationships. This improves referential integrity but requires careful consideration:
- User-related foreign keys now use SET NULL on delete
- Organization-related foreign keys use CASCADE on delete
- All foreign keys now use CASCADE on update
These changes ensure proper cleanup of related records but could lead to unintended data loss if not handled carefully in the application logic.
Consider implementing soft deletes or archiving mechanisms for critical data before actual deletion occurs.
Also applies to: 803-804, 816-817, 1468-1469, 1481-1482, 1494-1495, 1507-1508, 3963-3964, 3976-3977, 3989-3990, 4002-4003
|
Please fix the codeql test. It has been failing in this branch. |
It's not related to the pull request, something is wrong with codeql itself. It is not running for some reason even though the configuration is identical in all branches. |
added graphql mutation resolvers for creating, reading, updating and deleting an organization
extracted out `updatedAt` field as its own resolver for better access control
tags can be used as folders for tags, so there is no requirement for a seperate table for managing tag folders
added a utility function that takes in a javascript object and a list of key paths within that object as arguments and outputs all paths among those key paths that correspond to a non-undefined value
added graphql implementation for handling read/write operations for an organization membership added graphql implementation for handling read operations for relations between organization membership, organization and user
2e67972 to
7085979
Compare
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (67)
test/routes/graphql/gql.tada.d.ts (1)
13-13:
⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent ID type usage across organization-related inputs
The
idfield type is inconsistent across different input types:
MutationDeleteOrganizationInput: UsesIDscalarMutationUpdateOrganizationInput: UsesIDscalarQueryOrganizationInput: UsesStringscalarThis inconsistency could lead to type mismatches when handling organization IDs.
Apply this fix to ensure consistent ID type usage:
'QueryOrganizationInput': { kind: 'INPUT_OBJECT'; name: 'QueryOrganizationInput'; isOneOf: false; inputFields: [{ name: 'id'; type: { kind: 'NON_NULL'; name: never; ofType: { - kind: 'SCALAR'; name: 'String'; ofType: null; + kind: 'SCALAR'; name: 'ID'; ofType: null; }; }; defaultValue: null }]; };Also applies to: 15-15, 19-19, 24-24
src/utilities/getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.ts (4)
20-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add explanation for the lint ignore and improve type safety.
The
anytype and lint ignore can be avoided with proper typing.Apply this change:
- // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: <explanation> - const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: any, key) => { + const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: unknown, key: keyof T) => {Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-3: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add documentation for the complex type definition.
The recursive type
Paths<T>would benefit from detailed documentation explaining its purpose and structure, including examples of the resulting types for common use cases.Add JSDoc comments above the type:
+/** + * Recursively generates all possible key paths for a given object type. + * @example + * type User = { name: string; address: { city: string; zip: number } }; + * type UserPaths = Paths<User>; + * // Results in: ['name'] | ['address'] | ['address', 'city'] | ['address', 'zip'] + */ type Paths<T> = T extends object ? { [K in keyof T]: [K, ...Paths<T[K]>] | [K] }[keyof T] : never;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Recursively generates all possible key paths for a given object type. * @example * type User = { name: string; address: { city: string; zip: number } }; * type UserPaths = Paths<User>; * // Results in: ['name'] | ['address'] | ['address', 'city'] | ['address', 'zip'] */ type Paths<T> = T extends object ? { [K in keyof T]: [K, ...Paths<T[K]>] | [K] }[keyof T] : never;
5-7: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance function documentation with TypeScript-style JSDoc.
The current documentation could be more comprehensive with parameter descriptions, return type information, and usage examples.
Replace the current documentation with:
-/** - * This function takes in a javascript object and a list of key paths within that object as arguments and outputs all paths amongst those key paths that correspond to a non-undefined value. - */ +/** + * Filters an array of object key paths to only those that lead to defined values. + * @param options - The input options + * @param options.keyPaths - Array of possible key paths to check + * @param options.object - The object to traverse + * @returns Array of key paths that lead to defined values + * @example + * const obj = { user: { name: "John", age: undefined } }; + * const paths = [["user"], ["user", "name"], ["user", "age"]]; + * const result = getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues({ keyPaths: paths, object: obj }); + * // Returns: [["user"], ["user", "name"]] + */📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * Filters an array of object key paths to only those that lead to defined values. * @param options - The input options * @param options.keyPaths - Array of possible key paths to check * @param options.object - The object to traverse * @returns Array of key paths that lead to defined values * @example * const obj = { user: { name: "John", age: undefined } }; * const paths = [["user"], ["user", "name"], ["user", "age"]]; * const result = getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues({ keyPaths: paths, object: obj }); * // Returns: [["user"], ["user", "name"]] */
8-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add input validation and improve error handling.
The function should validate its inputs and handle edge cases gracefully.
Consider this enhanced implementation:
export const getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues = < T extends Record<string, unknown>, >({ keyPaths, object, }: { keyPaths: Paths<T>[]; object: T; }): Paths<T>[] => { + if (!object || typeof object !== 'object') { + throw new Error('Invalid object provided'); + } + + if (!Array.isArray(keyPaths)) { + throw new Error('Invalid keyPaths provided'); + } + const keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues: Paths<T>[] = []; for (const keyPath of keyPaths) { + if (!Array.isArray(keyPath) || keyPath.length === 0) { + continue; + } + const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: unknown, key: keyof T) => { return accumulator && accumulator[key] !== undefined ? accumulator[key] : undefined; }, object); if (value !== undefined) { keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.push(keyPath); } } return keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues; };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const getKeyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues = < T extends Record<string, unknown>, >({ keyPaths, object, }: { keyPaths: Paths<T>[]; object: T; }): Paths<T>[] => { if (!object || typeof object !== 'object') { throw new Error('Invalid object provided'); } if (!Array.isArray(keyPaths)) { throw new Error('Invalid keyPaths provided'); } const keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues: Paths<T>[] = []; for (const keyPath of keyPaths) { if (!Array.isArray(keyPath) || keyPath.length === 0) { continue; } const value = keyPath.reduce((accumulator: unknown, key: keyof T) => { return accumulator && accumulator[key] !== undefined ? accumulator[key] : undefined; }, object); if (value !== undefined) { keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues.push(keyPath); } } return keyPathsWithNonUndefinedValues; };src/drizzle/tables/users.ts (2)
181-572: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Extensive relationships in
usersTableRelationsenhance data modeling.The addition of numerous one-to-many and many-to-one relationships improves the ORM's ability to navigate between related entities. However, the sheer number of relationships can impact readability.
Consider organizing relationships into separate modules or grouping them logically within the file to enhance maintainability and readability.
580-580: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Validation for
avatarURIshould ensure proper URI format.Setting a minimum length of 1 for
avatarURIprevents empty strings but does not validate the format.Enhance the validation by adding a regex pattern to ensure that
avatarURIis a valid URI. This can prevent potential errors when the URI is used elsewhere in the application.src/drizzle/tables/tags.ts (3)
147-149: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Expand validation in
tagsTableInsertSchemaCurrently,
tagsTableInsertSchemaonly validates thenamefield. To enhance data integrity and prevent invalid data insertion, consider adding validation rules for other fields likeisFolder,organizationId, andparentTagFolderId. This ensures that all required fields meet expected criteria before insertion.Example of extending the validation schema:
export const tagsTableInsertSchema = createInsertSchema(tagsTable, { name: (schema) => schema.name.min(1).max(256), + isFolder: (schema) => schema.isFolder.required(), + organizationId: (schema) => schema.organizationId.uuid(), + parentTagFolderId: (schema) => schema.parentTagFolderId.uuid().nullable(), });Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
80-81: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Set a meaningful default value for
updatedAtSetting the default value of
updatedAttoNULLusing.$defaultFn(() => sql\${null}`)may not be ideal. Typically, theupdatedAtfield should default to the current timestamp upon creation to accurately reflect the record's initial state. Consider setting the default toNOW()` to ensure consistency and accurate tracking of updates.Apply this diff to set the default value to the current timestamp:
updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at", { mode: "date", precision: 3, withTimezone: true, }) - .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) + .defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
65-71:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential unintended cascading deletes on
parentTagFolderIdSetting
onDelete: "cascade"onparentTagFolderIdmay lead to unintended deletions of child tags when a parent tag folder is deleted. This could result in a chain reaction where deleting a single tag folder removes all nested tags and folders. Consider whether this behavior is desired. If not, you might want to changeonDeleteto"set null"or"restrict"to prevent accidental data loss.Apply this diff to modify the cascade behavior:
parentTagFolderId: uuid("parent_tag_folder_id").references( (): AnyPgColumn => tagsTable.id, { - onDelete: "cascade", + onDelete: "set null", onUpdate: "cascade", }, ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.parentTagFolderId: uuid("parent_tag_folder_id").references( (): AnyPgColumn => tagsTable.id, { onDelete: "set null", onUpdate: "cascade", }, ),test/routes/graphql/gql.tada-cache.d.ts (2)
7-32: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Missing Unit Tests for New Mutations and Queries
The newly added mutations and queries do not have accompanying unit tests. Adding tests will help ensure the correctness and reliability of these functionalities.
Would you like assistance in generating unit tests for these additions or opening a GitHub issue to track this task?
8-32:
⚠️ Potential issueTypographical Error in
maritalStatusEnumThe value
"seperated"in themaritalStatusenum is misspelled. It should be"separated".Apply this diff to correct the typo:
- maritalStatus: "divorced" | "engaged" | "married" | "seperated" | "single" | "widowed" | null; + maritalStatus: "divorced" | "engaged" | "married" | "separated" | "single" | "widowed" | null;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/drizzle/tables/tagAssignments.ts (3)
24-27:
⚠️ Potential issueReview the use of cascading deletes on foreign keys
Setting
onDelete: "cascade"for theassigneeIdandtagIdforeign keys means that deleting a user or a tag will delete all associated tag assignments. This could result in unintended data loss if users or tags are deleted. Please confirm that this cascading behavior is intended and aligns with the application's requirements.Also applies to: 51-53
87-88: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarify relationship comments for better readability
The comments for the
assignee,creator, andupdaterrelationships are identical, which may cause confusion. Consider updating the comments to specify each role more clearly, enhancing code readability.Apply this diff to update the comments:
/** - * Many to one relationship from `tag_assignments` table to `users` table. + * The user who has been assigned the tag (`assignee`). *//** - * Many to one relationship from `tag_assignments` table to `users` table. + * The user who created the tag assignment (`creator`). *//** - * Many to one relationship from `tag_assignments` table to `users` table. + * The user who last updated the tag assignment (`updater`). */Also applies to: 95-96, 111-112
62-63: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider initializing
updatedAtwith the current timestampCurrently,
updatedAtis assigned a default value ofnullusing.$defaultFn(() => sql\${null}`). This means theupdatedAtfield will remainnulluntil the first update occurs. It is standard practice to initializeupdatedAtto the current timestamp upon record creation to reflect the creation time. Consider setting the default value tonow()`.Apply this diff to set the default value to the current timestamp:
}) - .$defaultFn(() => sql`${null}`) + .defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements..defaultNow() .$onUpdate(() => new Date()),src/graphql/types/User/updatedAt.ts (2)
10-16: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Refactor duplicated error handling for unauthenticated users
The error handling for unauthenticated users is repeated in lines 10-16 and 28-34. Consider creating a helper function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability.
+function throwUnauthenticatedError() { + throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ + extensions: { + code: "unauthenticated", + }, + message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", + }); +} ... if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { - throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ - extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", - }, - message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", - }); + throwUnauthenticatedError(); } ... if (currentUser === undefined) { - throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ - extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", - }, - message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", - }); + throwUnauthenticatedError(); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
37-38: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use constants or enums for role comparisons
Instead of using hard-coded strings for role names, consider using constants or enums to prevent typos and improve maintainability.
- if (currentUser.role !== "administrator" && currentUserId !== parent.id) { + if (currentUser.role !== UserRole.ADMINISTRATOR && currentUserId !== parent.id) { ... +import { UserRole } from "~/src/graphql/enums/UserRole";Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Organization/creator.ts (3)
31-34: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarify log message for missing creator user
The log message might be misleading as
findFirstreturnsundefinedif no records are found. Consider updating the message for clarity.- "Postgres select operation returned an empty array for a organization's creator user id that isn't null." + "User with the given creatorId not found in usersTable, potential data inconsistency."📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (existingUser === undefined) { ctx.log.warn( "User with the given creatorId not found in usersTable, potential data inconsistency.", );
31-41: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Specify error code for data inconsistency
When
existingUseris undefined, throwing an error with a more specific code like"data_inconsistency"can aid in debugging and error tracking.- code: "unexpected", + code: "data_inconsistency",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (existingUser === undefined) { ctx.log.warn( "Postgres select operation returned an empty array for a organization's creator user id that isn't null.", ); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "data_inconsistency", }, message: "Something went wrong. Please try again later.", }); }
10-16: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Refactor duplicated error handling for unauthenticated users
The error handling for unauthenticated users is duplicated. Extracting this into a helper function can enhance code reuse and readability.
+function throwUnauthenticatedError() { + throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ + extensions: { + code: "unauthenticated", + }, + message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", + }); +} ... if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { - throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ - extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", - }, - message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", - }); + throwUnauthenticatedError(); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Organization/updatedAt.ts (2)
10-16: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Refactor duplicated error handling for unauthenticated users
The authentication error handling is repeated. Creating a helper function can improve code maintainability.
+function throwUnauthenticatedError() { + throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ + extensions: { + code: "unauthenticated", + }, + message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", + }); +} ... if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { - throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ - extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", - }, - message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", - }); + throwUnauthenticatedError(); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
46-49: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use constants or enums for role comparisons
Avoid hard-coded role strings. Utilize constants or enums for roles to prevent errors and enhance code clarity.
- if (currentUser.role !== "administrator" && - (currentUserOrganizationMembership === undefined || - currentUserOrganizationMembership.role !== "administrator")) { + if (currentUser.role !== UserRole.ADMINISTRATOR && + (currentUserOrganizationMembership === undefined || + currentUserOrganizationMembership.role !== OrganizationMembershipRole.ADMINISTRATOR)) { ... +import { UserRole } from "~/src/graphql/enums/UserRole"; +import { OrganizationMembershipRole } from "~/src/graphql/enums/OrganizationMembershipRole";Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Organization/updater.ts (5)
78-81: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarify log message for missing updater user
The log message may be unclear. Updating it can help with debugging.
- "Postgres select operation returned an empty array for a organization's updater user id that isn't null." + "User with the given updaterId not found in usersTable, potential data inconsistency."📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ctx.log.warn( "User with the given updaterId not found in usersTable, potential data inconsistency.", ); throw new TalawaGraphQLError({
36-41: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Adjust error code for unauthorized access
When
currentUserisundefined, the error code"forbidden_action"may not be appropriate. Consider using"unauthenticated"to accurately represent the authentication failure.- code: "forbidden_action", + code: "unauthenticated",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", });
10-17:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect error message for unauthenticated users
The error message mentions "authenticated organizations" instead of "authenticated users." Correcting this will improve clarity.
message: - "Only authenticated organizations can perform this action.", + "Only authenticated users can perform this action.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated", }, message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", });
10-17: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Refactor duplicated error handling for unauthenticated users
This error handling is repeated in multiple places. Extracting it into a helper function enhances maintainability.
+function throwUnauthenticatedError() { + throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ + extensions: { + code: "unauthenticated", + }, + message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", + }); +} ... if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { - throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ - extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", - }, - message: - "Only authenticated organizations can perform this action.", - }); + throwUnauthenticatedError(); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
48-51: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use constants or enums for role comparisons
Replace hard-coded role strings with constants or enums to improve code reliability.
- if (currentUser.role !== "administrator" && - (currentUserOrganizationMembership === undefined || - currentUserOrganizationMembership.role !== "administrator")) { + if (currentUser.role !== UserRole.ADMINISTRATOR && + (currentUserOrganizationMembership === undefined || + currentUserOrganizationMembership.role !== OrganizationMembershipRole.ADMINISTRATOR)) { ... +import { UserRole } from "~/src/graphql/enums/UserRole"; +import { OrganizationMembershipRole } from "~/src/graphql/enums/OrganizationMembershipRole";Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/User/User.ts (2)
35-35: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Minor grammatical correction in description
Adjusting the wording enhances clarity.
- description: "Date time at the time the user was created.", + description: "Date and time when the user was created.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Date and time when the user was created.",
10-10:
⚠️ Potential issueConsider excluding sensitive fields from the User type
By directly using
usersTable.$inferSelect, thepasswordHashfield may be exposed. It's important to exclude sensitive fields to protect user data.- export type User = typeof usersTable.$inferSelect; + export type User = Omit<typeof usersTable.$inferSelect, "passwordHash">;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export type User = Omit<typeof usersTable.$inferSelect, "passwordHash">;src/graphql/types/Mutation/deleteOrganization.ts (1)
27-34: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Refactor authentication and authorization checks into a middleware
The authentication and authorization logic is repeated within this mutation and across other mutations. Consider refactoring this logic into a middleware or helper function to enhance code reusability and maintainability.
Also applies to: 64-71, 73-80
src/drizzle/tables/organizations.ts (1)
185-185: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add URI format validation for
avatarURICurrently,
avatarURIis only validated for minimum length. Consider adding validation to ensure it adheres to a valid URI format to prevent storing invalid or malformed URIs.src/graphql/types/Organization/members.ts (2)
21-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance error handling for cursor parsing
When parsing the cursor, consider providing more informative error messages to assist clients in debugging cursor-related issues. Detailed error feedback can improve the developer experience.
94-172: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review the performance of pagination queries with large datasets
The pagination logic uses complex SQL queries with subqueries and
EXISTSclauses. Analyze the performance implications on large datasets and consider optimizing the queries or adding appropriate indexes to improve efficiency.src/graphql/types/User/organizationsWhereMember.ts (5)
185-196: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Provide more specific error message when no resources are found for the cursor
When the cursor is invalid or no resources are found, throwing a generic error may not be helpful for clients.
Consider specifying whether the cursor is invalid or if no records exist beyond the cursor.
43-53: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Ensure correct date parsing in
cursorSchemaIn the
cursorSchema, thecreatedAtfield is being parsed from a string to aDateobject without specifying the time zone. This might lead to incorrect date parsing due to timezone differences.Use
z.coerce.date()to ensure proper date parsing:extend({ - createdAt: z.string().datetime(), + createdAt: z.coerce.date(), }) .transform((arg) => ({ - createdAt: new Date(arg.createdAt), organizationId: arg.organizationId, }));📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const cursorSchema = organizationMembershipsTableInsertSchema .pick({ organizationId: true, }) .extend({ createdAt: z.coerce.date(), }) .transform((arg) => ({ createdAt: arg.createdAt, organizationId: arg.organizationId, }));
96-130:
⚠️ Potential issueLogic error in constructing the
whereclause forisInversedcaseIn the
isInversedcondition, theexistssubquery seems unnecessary and may cause incorrect results. Theexistscheck is duplicating the main query condition, and the use ofeq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id)is redundant since it is already specified in the mainwhereclause.Consider simplifying the
whereclause by removing theexistscondition:- where = and( - exists( - ctx.drizzleClient - .select() - .from(organizationMembershipsTable) - .where( - and( - eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), - eq( - organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, - cursor.organizationId, - ), - ), - ), - ), - eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), - or( - and( - eq( - organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, - cursor.createdAt, - ), - gt( - organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, - cursor.organizationId, - ), - ), - gt(organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt), - ), - ); + where = and( + eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), + or( + and( + eq( + organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, + cursor.createdAt, + ), + gt( + organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, + cursor.organizationId, + ), + ), + gt(organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt), + ), + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (isInversed) { if (cursor !== undefined) { where = and( eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), or( and( eq( organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt, ), gt( organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, cursor.organizationId, ), ), gt(organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt), ), ); } else { where = eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id); }
21-35: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Improve error handling for invalid cursor
The current implementation catches any error during cursor parsing and adds a custom issue to the context. However, it would be better to catch specific errors to avoid masking unexpected exceptions.
Refactor the error handling to catch only
ZodErrorand JSON parsing errors:try { if (arg.cursor !== undefined) { cursor = cursorSchema.parse( JSON.parse(Buffer.from(arg.cursor, "base64url").toString("utf-8")), ); } - } catch (error) { + } catch (error: any) { + if (error instanceof SyntaxError || error instanceof z.ZodError) { ctx.addIssue({ code: "custom", message: "Not a valid cursor.", path: [arg.isInversed ? "before" : "after"], }); + } else { + throw error; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.try { if (arg.cursor !== undefined) { cursor = cursorSchema.parse( JSON.parse(Buffer.from(arg.cursor, "base64url").toString("utf-8")), ); } } catch (error: any) { if (error instanceof SyntaxError || error instanceof z.ZodError) { ctx.addIssue({ code: "custom", message: "Not a valid cursor.", path: [arg.isInversed ? "before" : "after"], }); } else { throw error; } }
132-166:
⚠️ Potential issuePotential incorrect comparison in the
whereclause whenisInversedis falseIn the
elseblock whenisInversedis false, there is a possible logic error whereorganizationMembershipsTable.memberIdis compared tocursor.organizationId. This seems incorrect becausememberIdandorganizationIdare different entities.Correct the comparisons to match the appropriate fields:
- where = and( - exists( - ctx.drizzleClient - .select() - .from(organizationMembershipsTable) - .where( - and( - eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), - eq( - organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, - cursor.organizationId, - ), - ), - ), - ), - eq(organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, parent.id), - or( - and( - eq( - organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, - cursor.createdAt, - ), - lt( - organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, - cursor.organizationId, - ), - ), - lt(organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt), - ), - ); + where = and( + eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), + or( + and( + eq( + organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, + cursor.createdAt, + ), + lt( + organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, + cursor.organizationId, + ), + ), + lt(organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt), + ), + );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (cursor !== undefined) { where = and( eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id), or( and( eq( organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt, ), lt( organizationMembershipsTable.organizationId, cursor.organizationId, ), ), lt(organizationMembershipsTable.createdAt, cursor.createdAt), ), ); } else { where = eq(organizationMembershipsTable.memberId, parent.id); } }src/graphql/types/Mutation/createOrganizationMembership.ts (2)
149-168: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify error message for existing membership
The error message indicates a forbidden action, but the condition is that the membership already exists.
Change the error code to
resource_already_existsto better reflect the issue.throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { - code: "forbidden_action_on_arguments_associated_resources", + code: "resource_already_exists", issues: [ { argumentPath: ["input", "memberId"], message: "This user already has the membership of the associated organization.", }, { argumentPath: ["input", "organizationId"], message: "This organization already has the associated member.", }, ], }, message: - "This action is forbidden on the resources associated to the provided arguments.", + "The organization membership already exists.", });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (existingOrganizationMembership !== undefined) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "resource_already_exists", issues: [ { argumentPath: ["input", "memberId"], message: "This user already has the membership of the associated organization.", }, { argumentPath: ["input", "organizationId"], message: "This organization already has the associated member.", }, ], }, message: "The organization membership already exists.", }); }
55-102: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Redundant authentication check
The authentication check for
currentUserbeingundefinedat line 95 is redundant since the authentication is already verified at the beginning.Remove the redundant check to simplify the code:
- if (currentUser === undefined) { - throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ - extensions: { - code: "unauthenticated", - }, - message: "Only authenticated users can perform this action.", - }); - }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const currentUserId = ctx.currentClient.user.id; const [ currentUser, existingMember, existingOrganization, existingOrganizationMembership, ] = await Promise.all([ ctx.drizzleClient.query.usersTable.findFirst({ columns: { role: true, }, where: (fields, operators) => operators.eq(fields.id, currentUserId), }), ctx.drizzleClient.query.usersTable.findFirst({ columns: { role: true, }, where: (fields, operators) => operators.eq(fields.id, parsedArgs.input.memberId), }), ctx.drizzleClient.query.organizationsTable.findFirst({ where: (fields, operators) => operators.eq(fields.id, parsedArgs.input.organizationId), }), ctx.drizzleClient.query.organizationMembershipsTable.findFirst({ columns: { role: true, }, where: (fields, operators) => operators.and( operators.eq(fields.memberId, parsedArgs.input.memberId), operators.eq( fields.organizationId, parsedArgs.input.organizationId, ), ), }), ]);src/graphql/types/Mutation/deleteOrganizationMembership.ts (3)
102-140: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Redundant authentication check
Similar to the previous file, the authentication check for
currentUserbeingundefinedat line 102 is redundant.Remove the redundant check to streamline the code.
156-171: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Improper error code for missing organization membership
When the organization membership doesn't exist, the error code used is
arguments_associated_resources_not_found, which may not be accurate.Consider using a more specific error code like
resource_not_found.
216-224: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Potential race condition in deletion
Between checking for the existence of the membership and deleting it, the membership could be altered or deleted by another process, leading to unexpected errors.
Use database transactions or implement optimistic locking to prevent this issue.
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateOrganizationMembership.ts (1)
103-141: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Redundant authentication check
The check for
currentUserbeingundefinedafter already verifying authentication is unnecessary.Remove the redundant check to clean up the code.
schema.graphql (2)
281-283:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing authorization directives on
createOrganizationmutationThe
createOrganizationmutation lacks authorization directives or descriptions indicating who can perform this action.Ensure that only authorized users can create organizations.
655-694: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Inconsistent field descriptions in
OrganizationtypeSome fields like
createdAtandupdatedAthave descriptions, while others likenameandiddo not.For consistency and better API documentation, add descriptions to all fields.
src/graphql/types/User/index.ts (1)
3-4: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider documenting the User-Organization relationship.
The new imports properly integrate the organization membership functionality into the User type.
Consider adding a README.md in the User directory to document the relationship between User and Organization types, especially focusing on the membership model and update tracking.
src/graphql/types/Query/index.ts (1)
3-3: 💡 Codebase verification
Organization query needs authentication check
The organization query implementation lacks authentication checks despite having the authentication context available. The GraphQL context provides
currentClient.isAuthenticatedflag, but it's not being utilized in the query resolver.
src/graphql/types/Query/organization.ts: Add authentication check at the beginning of the resolver usingcurrentClient.isAuthenticatedExample pattern seen in other authenticated queries in the codebase:
if (!ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthenticated" }, message: "Authentication required.", }); }🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify query permission checks.
The organization query integration is properly structured.
Let's verify that proper authentication checks are in place for the organization query:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for authentication/authorization checks in organization query # Look for auth-related code in the organization query implementation rg -A 5 "authenticate|authorize|isAuthenticated" src/graphql/types/Query/organization.ts || trueLength of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's first check if the organization.ts file exists and see its content fd organization.ts src/graphql/types/Query/ --exec cat {} # Also, let's look for any auth-related utilities or middleware in the codebase rg -g '!{dist,build}/*' -l "auth|permission|isAuthenticated" src/Length of output: 2937
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the GraphQL context setup for authentication cat src/graphql/context.ts # Also check if there's a middleware or authentication check in the GraphQL route cat src/routes/graphql.tsLength of output: 5639
src/graphql/enums/OrganizationMembershipRole.ts (1)
7-7: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a descriptive comment for the enum type.
The description field should provide meaningful documentation about the purpose and usage of this enum type in the GraphQL schema.
- description: "", + description: "Defines the possible roles a user can have within an organization (administrator or regular member).",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Defines the possible roles a user can have within an organization (administrator or regular member).",src/graphql/inputs/QueryOrganizationInput.ts (1)
14-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a meaningful description for the input type
The description field is empty. Add a clear description explaining the purpose of this input type, such as "Input type for querying organization details by ID".
- description: "", + description: "Input type for querying organization details by ID",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for querying organization details by ID",src/utilities/isNotNullish.ts (1)
1-12: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fix JSDoc formatting issues
The JSDoc example has unnecessary escape characters in the curly braces which affects readability.
-function print(str: string | null) \{ +function print(str: string | null) { - if(isNotNullish(str)) \{ + if(isNotNullish(str)) { - console.log(`the string is ${str}`) + console.log(`the string is ${str}`) - \} else \{ + } else { - console.log(`the string is null`) + console.log(`the string is null}`) - \} + } - \} + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * This function is used to check nullish state of a value passed to it. Nullish means the value being either `null` or `undefined`. If the value is found to be nullish, the function returns the boolean `false`, else it returns the boolean `true`. * @example * Here's an example:- * function print(str: string | null) { * if(isNotNullish(str)) { * console.log(`the string is ${str}`) * } else { * console.log(`the string is null`) * } * } */src/graphql/inputs/MutationDeleteOrganizationInput.ts (1)
14-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a descriptive comment for the input type
The description field is empty. Consider adding a meaningful description to improve API documentation.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for deleting an organization.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for deleting an organization.",src/graphql/inputs/MutationDeleteOrganizationMembershipInput.ts (1)
16-16: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a descriptive comment for the input type
The description field is empty. Consider adding a meaningful description to improve API documentation.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for deleting an organization membership.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for deleting an organization membership.",src/graphql/inputs/MutationCreateOrganizationInput.ts (2)
20-20: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add implementation description.
The implementation description is currently empty. Consider adding a description like: "Input type for creating a new organization."
43-45: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding postal code validation.
The postal code field could benefit from format validation to ensure consistency. Consider adding a regex pattern or validation function based on the
countryCodefield.Example validation using zod:
postalCode: t.string({ description: "Postal code of the organization.", validate: { schema: z.string().regex(/^\d{5}(-\d{4})?$/, "Invalid postal code format") } })src/graphql/inputs/MutationCreateOrganizationMembershipInput.ts (1)
21-21: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add implementation description.
The implementation description is currently empty. Consider adding a description like: "Input type for creating a new organization membership."
src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateOrganizationMembershipInput.ts (2)
28-28: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add implementation description.
The implementation description is currently empty. Consider adding a description like: "Input type for updating an existing organization membership."
15-21:
⚠️ Potential issueFix refinement logic for optional arguments.
The current refinement logic includes
memberIdandorganizationIdin the destructuring but checksremainingArgfor optional values. Since these fields are required, they shouldn't be part of this validation.Suggested fix:
- ({ memberId, organizationId, ...remainingArg }) => - Object.values(remainingArg).some((value) => value !== undefined), + (input) => + input.role !== undefined,Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Organization/Organization.ts (2)
10-10: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a meaningful description for the Organization type
The description field is currently empty. Add a clear description of what an Organization represents in the system.
- description: "", + description: "Represents an organization entity within the system with its core attributes and metadata.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Represents an organization entity within the system with its core attributes and metadata.",
11-46: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding validation constraints and tracking fields
The implementation looks solid, but consider these improvements:
- Add
updatedAtfield for tracking modifications- Consider adding validation constraints (e.g., length limits) for string fields like name and description
Example addition:
+ updatedAt: t.expose("updatedAt", { + description: "Date time when the organization was last updated.", + type: "DateTime", + }),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/Query/organization.ts (1)
24-43:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd authorization check for organization access
The query resolver lacks authorization checks. Organizations might have access restrictions that should be enforced.
Example implementation:
resolve: async (_parent, args, ctx) => { + if (!ctx.currentUser) { + throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ + extensions: { + code: "unauthorized", + }, + message: "You must be logged in to view organization details.", + }); + } const { data: parsedArgs,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.resolve: async (_parent, args, ctx) => { if (!ctx.currentUser) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "unauthorized", }, message: "You must be logged in to view organization details.", }); } const { data: parsedArgs, error, success, } = queryOrganizationArgumentsSchema.safeParse(args); if (!success) { throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ extensions: { code: "invalid_arguments", issues: error.issues.map((issue) => ({ argumentPath: issue.path, message: issue.message, })), }, message: "Invalid arguments provided.", }); }src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateOrganizationInput.ts (3)
42-43: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fix inconsistent terminology in field descriptions
The descriptions use both "resides in" and "exists in" for location fields. Maintain consistent terminology.
- description: "Name of the city where the organization resides in.", + description: "Name of the city where the organization is located.", - description: "Name of the state the organization resides in.", + description: "Name of the state where the organization is located.",Also applies to: 63-64
33-33: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add a meaningful description for the input type
The input type description is empty. Add a clear description of its purpose.
- description: "", + description: "Input type for updating an existing organization's details.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.description: "Input type for updating an existing organization's details.",
6-26: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance input validation with field constraints
The schema should include additional validation rules for:
- Maximum lengths for text fields
- URI format validation for avatarURI
- Postal code format validation
Example enhancement:
export const mutationUpdateOrganizationInputSchema = organizationsTableInsertSchema .omit({ createdAt: true, creatorId: true, id: true, name: true, updatedAt: true, updaterId: true, }) .extend({ id: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.id.unwrap(), - name: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.name.optional(), + name: organizationsTableInsertSchema.shape.name.optional().min(2).max(100), + avatarURI: z.string().url().optional(), + postalCode: z.string().regex(/^\d{5}(-\d{4})?$/).optional(), })Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/graphql/types/User/updater.ts (1)
55-59: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider implementing DataLoader to prevent N+1 queries
The current implementation could lead to N+1 query problems when fetching updater information for multiple users. Consider implementing DataLoader to batch and cache these database queries.
Would you like me to provide an example implementation using DataLoader?
test/routes/graphql/documentNodes.ts (1)
295-300: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider impact of separating updatedAt into a standalone query
While separating updatedAt into its own query provides more granular control, it could lead to additional network requests when both user data and updatedAt are needed. Consider:
- The performance impact of requiring multiple queries
- Whether this separation aligns with common usage patterns
Would you like me to suggest alternative approaches that balance granularity with performance?
src/utilities/talawaGraphQLError.ts (1)
166-188: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fix typo in documentation example
The type definition and structure look good, but there's a typo in the example code.
- message: "You are not authorzied to change your user role.", + message: "You are not authorized to change your user role.",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./** * When the client is not authorized to perform an action with certain arguments. * * @example * throw new TalawaGraphQLError({ * extensions: { * code: "unauthorized_arguments", * issues: [ * { * argumentPath: ["input", "role"], * message: "You are not authorized to change your user role.", * }, * ], * }, * message: "You are not authorized to perform this action with the provided arguments." * }) */ export type UnauthorizedArgumentsExtensions = { issues: { argumentPath: (string | number)[]; }[]; code: "unauthorized_arguments"; };
|
Closing as the merged PR #2741 includes the changes in this PR. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
feature
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
This pull request contains graphql implementation for handling read and write operations for talawa organization memberships.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Also includes commits from PR #2720 which is yet to be merged.
EACH INDIVIDUAL COMMIT CONTAINS CHANGES RELATED TO THE COMMIT MESSAGE, COMMITS SHOULD BE VIEWED IN A SERIAL ORDER FOR AN EASIER REVIEW PROCESS
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests