BugFix : Fixed Improper Handling for Non-Numeric Values in Allotted hours section of Create Action item modal #3417
Conversation
…additional test cases that past contributors overrided using ignore statements
WalkthroughThe pull request enhances input validation for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3417 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 1.90% 88.65% +86.74%
=====================================================
Files 316 338 +22
Lines 8249 8626 +377
Branches 1880 1922 +42
=====================================================
+ Hits 157 7647 +7490
+ Misses 8083 649 -7434
- Partials 9 330 +321 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (1)
229-242: Consider explicitly handling edge cases such as Infinity and fractional hours.
This validation logic correctly setsallottedHourstonullwhen encountering non-numeric or negative inputs. However, you might also want to guard against extremely large values (e.g.,Infinity) or decide whether fractional hours should be accepted. That said, the current approach effectively prevents improper inputs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx (1)
Learnt from: yugal07
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3379
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-23T14:09:29.505Z
Learning: In form state management for the `allottedHours` field in `ItemModal.tsx`, it's crucial to maintain type checking using `typeof value !== 'number'` along with `Number.isNaN` to ensure proper validation of numeric values while preserving the form state integrity.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (3)
781-804: Good coverage for invalid input scenarios.
These tests accurately verify that letters and negative values reset the input. Consider extending coverage for edge cases like large values or fractions if desired.
806-822: Effective edge-case checks.
You’re thoroughly testing scenarios likeNaN, negative values, and arbitrary invalid strings. This reaffirms that your validation logic inItemModal.tsxworks as intended.
847-856: Solid test for null date inputs.
This ensures the date field gracefully handlesnullvalues. The logic is well-covered and helps prevent unexpected behavior.
|
@palisadoes, could this be a flaky test? As far as I know, a CSS import isn't needed in a test file. If possible, could you re-run the tests? Thanks! |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (3)
806-821: Consider adding more edge cases.While the current edge cases cover invalid strings, NaN, and negative numbers, consider adding tests for:
- Decimal numbers
- Very large numbers
- Leading/trailing spaces
it('validates allottedHours edge cases', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); // Test invalid string fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 'invalid' } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test NaN fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: NaN } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test negative number fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: -5 } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test decimal number + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '5.5' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test very large number + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '999999999999' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test leading/trailing spaces + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: ' 5 ' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('5'); });
866-886: Consider adding validation for invalid category selection.While the test covers basic category selection, consider adding tests for:
- Invalid category names
- Special characters in category names
it('validates category selection', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const categorySelect = await screen.findByTestId('categorySelect'); const inputField = within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox'); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); expect(inputField).toBeRequired(); fireEvent.mouseDown(inputField); const categoryOption = await screen.findByText('Category 1'); fireEvent.click(categoryOption); expect(inputField).toHaveValue('Category 1'); fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(inputField).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test invalid category name + fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: 'Non-existent Category' } }); + expect(inputField).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test special characters + fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: 'Category @#$%' } }); + expect(inputField).toHaveValue(''); }); });
909-925: Consider adding more date validation cases.While the test covers basic date validation, consider adding tests for:
- Date format validation
- Past dates
- Far future dates
it('validates due date handling', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020'); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); + + // Test different date formats + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '2025-01-01' } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); + + // Test past date + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/1900' } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test far future date + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2100' } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (6)
781-804: LGTM! Well-structured test cases for allotted hours validation.The test cases thoroughly validate the handling of invalid inputs (letters and negative values) and confirm the acceptance of valid positive numbers.
847-864: LGTM! Good coverage of empty and null values.The test case properly validates the handling of empty strings and null values for both allotted hours and pre-completion notes.
888-907: LGTM! Good coverage of assignee type changes.The test properly validates the UI updates when switching between individual and group assignee types.
927-951: LGTM! Good network error handling test.The test properly validates the error handling for GraphQL errors during form submission.
953-962: LGTM! Good null date handling.The test properly validates that null date values are converted to empty strings.
964-986: LGTM! Comprehensive timezone edge case testing.The test thoroughly validates date handling around DST changes and midnight boundaries.
|
Hello @palisadoes, this test failing says SignOut.tsx file is not prettier formatted. However i did not work in that file and it appears to be in the format on running the check script. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (5)
806-821: Consider adding more edge cases for allotted hours validation.While the current test covers basic edge cases, consider adding tests for:
- Decimal numbers
- Very large numbers
- Special characters
it('validates allottedHours edge cases', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); // Test invalid string fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 'invalid' } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test NaN fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: NaN } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test negative number fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: -5 } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test decimal number + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 5.5 } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test very large number + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1 } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test special characters + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '5!' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); });
847-864: Add assertions for form state after value changes.The test should verify that the form's internal state is updated correctly after value changes, not just the input field values.
it('handles empty and null form values correctly', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.noneUpdated); fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); + expect(screen.queryByText(/error/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: null } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); }); });
866-886: Add validation for invalid category selections.The test should also verify behavior when selecting invalid or non-existent categories.
it('validates category selection', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const categorySelect = await screen.findByTestId('categorySelect'); const inputField = within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox'); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); expect(inputField).toBeRequired(); fireEvent.mouseDown(inputField); const categoryOption = await screen.findByText('Category 1'); fireEvent.click(categoryOption); expect(inputField).toHaveValue('Category 1'); fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(inputField).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test invalid category + fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: 'Non-existent Category' } }); + expect(screen.queryByText(/invalid category/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); }); });
927-951: Add more network error scenarios.The test should cover different types of network errors and their handling.
it('handles network errors gracefully', async () => { renderItemModal(link2, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const categorySelect = await screen.findByTestId('categorySelect'); const inputField = within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox'); fireEvent.mouseDown(inputField); const categoryOption = await screen.findByText('Category 1'); fireEvent.click(categoryOption); const memberSelect = await screen.findByTestId('memberSelect'); const memberInput = within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox'); fireEvent.mouseDown(memberInput); const memberOption = await screen.findByText('Harve Lance'); fireEvent.click(memberOption); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); }); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Mock Graphql Error'); + // Verify error state in the UI + expect(screen.getByText(/error occurred/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); + expect(submitButton).not.toBeDisabled(); }); });
964-986: Enhance timezone edge case testing.The test should verify the actual stored values, not just the input display.
it('handles timezone edge cases', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); // Test dates around DST changes const dstDates = [ '03/12/2025', // Spring forward '11/05/2025', // Fall back ]; for (const date of dstDates) { fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: date } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(date); + // Verify the stored value is in UTC + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalled(); } // Test midnight boundary dates fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); + // Verify midnight is handled correctly in UTC + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalled(); }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
781-804: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for allotted hours validation.The test case thoroughly validates the handling of invalid inputs (letters and negative values) and confirms the acceptance of valid positive numbers.
| // validating when dates are due | ||
| it('validates due date handling', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| await waitFor(async () => { | ||
| const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); | ||
|
|
||
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); | ||
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); | ||
|
|
||
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } }); | ||
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020'); | ||
|
|
||
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); | ||
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for past dates.
The test should verify that past dates are not accepted as valid due dates.
it('validates due date handling', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
await waitFor(async () => {
const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate);
fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } });
expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('');
- fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } });
- expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020');
+ // Test past date
+ const pastDate = '01/01/2020';
+ fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } });
+ expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('');
+ expect(screen.queryByText(/date must be in the future/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } });
expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025');
});
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // validating when dates are due | |
| it('validates due date handling', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| await waitFor(async () => { | |
| const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020'); | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| // validating when dates are due | |
| it('validates due date handling', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| await waitFor(async () => { | |
| const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); | |
| // Test past date | |
| const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); | |
| expect(screen.queryByText(/date must be in the future/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (3)
806-821: Consider consolidating allotted hours validation tests.The edge cases test overlaps with the previous test. Consider merging them into a single comprehensive test case that covers all validation scenarios.
- it('validates allottedHours edge cases', async () => { - renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); - const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); - - // Test invalid string - fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 'invalid' } }); - expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); - - // Test NaN - fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: NaN } }); - expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); - - // Test negative number - fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: -5 } }); - expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); - });
866-886: Add test for invalid category selection.The test should also verify the behavior when an invalid category is selected.
it('validates category selection', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const categorySelect = await screen.findByTestId('categorySelect'); const inputField = within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox'); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); expect(inputField).toBeRequired(); fireEvent.mouseDown(inputField); const categoryOption = await screen.findByText('Category 1'); fireEvent.click(categoryOption); expect(inputField).toHaveValue('Category 1'); fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(inputField).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test invalid category selection + fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: 'Invalid Category' } }); + expect(inputField).toHaveValue('Invalid Category'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + // Add expectations based on your requirements + // expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Invalid category selected'); }); });
965-987: Enhance timezone edge case testing.The test should include more comprehensive timezone scenarios:
- Cross-day boundary dates in different timezones
- Dates at the exact DST transition time
it('handles timezone edge cases', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); // Test dates around DST changes const dstDates = [ '03/12/2025', // Spring forward '11/05/2025', // Fall back + '03/12/2025 02:00', // Exact DST transition time + '11/05/2025 02:00', // Exact DST transition time ]; for (const date of dstDates) { fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: date } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(date); } - // Test midnight boundary dates - fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); - expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); + // Test cross-day boundary dates in different timezones + const crossDayDates = [ + '12/31/2024 23:59:59', // UTC-12 + '01/01/2025 00:00:01', // UTC+14 + ]; + + for (const date of crossDayDates) { + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: date } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(date); + } }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (2)
781-804: LGTM! Well-structured test for allotted hours validation.The test comprehensively covers the validation requirements:
- Letters are rejected and field is reset
- Negative values are rejected and field is reset
- Positive numbers are accepted
909-925: Add validation for past dates.The test should verify that past dates are not accepted as valid due dates.
| //checking for empty and null values | ||
| it('handles empty and null form values correctly', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| await waitFor(async () => { | ||
| const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | ||
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | ||
|
|
||
| fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '' } }); | ||
| expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); | ||
|
|
||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); | ||
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); | ||
|
|
||
| fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: null } }); | ||
| expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add assertions for form submission with empty values.
While the test verifies that empty/null values are handled correctly in the UI, it should also verify the form submission behavior with these values.
it('handles empty and null form values correctly', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
await waitFor(async () => {
const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours);
const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes);
fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '' } });
expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('');
fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } });
expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('');
fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: null } });
expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('');
+
+ // Verify form submission with empty values
+ const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn');
+ fireEvent.click(submitButton);
+
+ // Add expectations based on your requirements
+ // For example:
+ // expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Please fill in required fields');
});
});Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
909-925: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for past dates.
The test should verify that past dates are not accepted as valid due dates.
Apply this diff to add past date validation:
fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); - fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } }); - expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020'); + // Test past date + const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + expect(screen.queryByText(/date must be in the future/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025');
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (2)
806-821: Consider adding more edge cases for allotted hours validation.While the current test covers basic edge cases, consider adding tests for:
it('validates allottedHours edge cases', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); // Test invalid string fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 'invalid' } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test NaN fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: NaN } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test negative number fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: -5 } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test decimal numbers + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 5.5 } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test extremely large numbers + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1 } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); });
965-1002: Add error state validation in comprehensive form test.While the test covers successful form submission, it should also verify error states.
Add validation for error states:
// Test notes const notesInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); fireEvent.change(notesInput, { target: { value: 'Test notes' } }); + // Test error states + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '-1' } }); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('invalid')); + }); + + // Reset to valid state + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '10' } }); fireEvent.click(submitButton); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Chaitanya1672
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2049
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx:112-138
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: The `istanbul ignore next` comments in the `ActionItemUpdateModal.tsx` file were added as part of a commit that introduced tests for the `ActionItemUpdateModal` component. Removing these comments and writing tests to cover the previously ignored lines is recommended to ensure code integrity and improve test coverage.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (4)
781-804: LGTM! Well-structured test for allotted hours validation.The test case effectively validates the core functionality mentioned in the PR objectives, ensuring that:
- Letters are rejected and field is reset
- Negative values are rejected and field is reset
- Positive numbers are accepted
927-951: LGTM! Comprehensive network error handling test.The test effectively verifies that network errors are caught and displayed to the user.
1004-1026: LGTM! Thorough timezone edge case testing.The test effectively covers:
- DST transition dates
- Midnight boundary cases
847-864: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd form submission test for empty values.
The test verifies UI behavior but should also test form submission with empty values.
Apply this diff to add form submission testing:
fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: null } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test form submission with empty values + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('required')); + });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
992-1008:⚠️ Potential issueAdd validation for past dates.
The test allows past dates to be set, which could lead to invalid action items. This was previously flagged in a review comment.
Apply this diff to validate past dates:
it('validates due date handling', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); - fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } }); - expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020'); + // Test past date + const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + expect(screen.queryByText(/date must be in the future/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); }); });
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
781-834: Enhance test coverage for allotted hours validation.The test cases comprehensively cover basic validation scenarios. Consider adding these additional test cases for more thorough validation:
it('validates allottedHours edge cases', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); // Existing tests... + // Test decimal precision + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '5.123' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('5.12'); + + // Test extremely large numbers + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '1000000000' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test numbers in string format + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '42.0' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('42'); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
| it('handles floating point numbers for allottedHours', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | ||
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1.5' } }); | ||
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '0.001' } }); | ||
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '99.999' } }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('handles scientific notation for allottedHours', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | ||
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e2' } }); | ||
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e-2' } }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add assertions for numeric format handling.
The test cases for floating point and scientific notation need assertions to verify the expected behavior:
it('handles floating point numbers for allottedHours', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours);
fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1.5' } });
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('1.5');
+
fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '0.001' } });
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.001');
+
fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '99.999' } });
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('99.999');
});
it('handles scientific notation for allottedHours', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours);
fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e2' } });
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('100');
+
fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e-2' } });
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.01');
+
+ // Test boundary cases
+ fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e10' } });
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('');
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('handles floating point numbers for allottedHours', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1.5' } }); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '0.001' } }); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '99.999' } }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles scientific notation for allottedHours', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e2' } }); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e-2' } }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles floating point numbers for allottedHours', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1.5' } }); | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('1.5'); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '0.001' } }); | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.001'); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '99.999' } }); | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('99.999'); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles scientific notation for allottedHours', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e2' } }); | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('100'); | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e-2' } }); | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.01'); | |
| // Test boundary cases | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e10' } }); | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); | |
| }); |
| it('handles empty strings in all text fields', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); | ||
|
|
||
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | ||
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | ||
|
|
||
| await waitFor(() => { | ||
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('handles whitespace-only strings', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: ' ' } }); | ||
|
|
||
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | ||
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | ||
| target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add assertions to verify form behavior.
The test cases for form field handling lack assertions to verify the expected behavior after input changes. Add expectations to ensure the form state is updated correctly:
it('handles whitespace-only strings', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes);
fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: ' ' } });
+ expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(' ');
const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn');
fireEvent.click(submitButton);
+ await waitFor(() => {
+ expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation);
+ });
});
it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes);
fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, {
target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' },
});
+ expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?');
+
+ const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn');
+ fireEvent.click(submitButton);
+ await waitFor(() => {
+ expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation);
+ });
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('handles empty strings in all text fields', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles whitespace-only strings', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: ' ' } }); | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' }, | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles empty strings in all text fields', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles whitespace-only strings', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: ' ' } }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(' '); | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?'); | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (3)
932-947: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd assertions for numeric format handling.
The test cases for floating point and scientific notation need assertions to verify the expected behavior.
it('handles floating point numbers for allottedHours', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1.5' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('1.5'); + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '0.001' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.001'); + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '99.999' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('99.999'); }); it('handles scientific notation for allottedHours', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e2' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('100'); + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e-2' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.01'); + + // Test boundary cases + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e10' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); });
848-860: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd assertions for form submission with empty values.
While the test verifies that empty/null values are handled correctly in the UI, it should also verify the form submission behavior with these values.
it('handles empty and null form values correctly', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: null } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Verify form submission with empty values + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + + // Add expectations based on your requirements + // For example: + // expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith('Please fill in required fields'); }); });Also applies to: 862-884, 886-910
1023-1039: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for past dates.
The test should verify that past dates are not accepted as valid due dates.
it('validates due date handling', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); - fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } }); - expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020'); + // Test past date + const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + expect(screen.queryByText(/date must be in the future/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (4)
781-792: LGTM! Good test coverage for infinite values.The test cases properly validate that both
Infinityand-Infinityvalues are handled correctly by resetting the field to an empty value.
794-817: LGTM! Comprehensive validation for non-numeric and negative values.The test cases thoroughly verify that:
- Letters are rejected and field is reset
- Negative values are rejected and field is reset
- Valid positive numbers are accepted
819-834: LGTM! Good coverage of edge cases.The test cases properly handle invalid strings, NaN, and negative numbers.
1093-1115: LGTM! Good coverage of timezone edge cases.The test cases properly handle:
- Dates around DST changes
- Midnight boundary dates
| it('handles rapid form field changes', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | ||
| const values = ['1', '2', '3', '4', '5']; | ||
|
|
||
| values.forEach((value) => { | ||
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value } }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add assertions for rapid form field changes.
The test should verify that the field value is updated correctly after each rapid change.
it('handles rapid form field changes', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours);
const values = ['1', '2', '3', '4', '5'];
values.forEach((value) => {
fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value } });
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(value);
});
+
+ // Verify final value persists
+ await waitFor(() => {
+ expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('5');
+ });
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('handles rapid form field changes', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | |
| const values = ['1', '2', '3', '4', '5']; | |
| values.forEach((value) => { | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value } }); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles rapid form field changes', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); | |
| const values = ['1', '2', '3', '4', '5']; | |
| values.forEach((value) => { | |
| fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value } }); | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(value); | |
| }); | |
| // Verify final value persists | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('5'); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
| it('handles extremely long text input', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | ||
| target: { value: 'a'.repeat(1000) }, | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add assertions for long text input handling.
The test should verify that the long text input is handled correctly.
it('handles extremely long text input', async () => {
renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]);
const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes);
fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, {
target: { value: 'a'.repeat(1000) },
});
+ expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('a'.repeat(1000));
+
+ // Verify form submission with long text
+ const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn');
+ fireEvent.click(submitButton);
+ await waitFor(() => {
+ expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation);
+ });
});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('handles extremely long text input', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: 'a'.repeat(1000) }, | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles extremely long text input', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: 'a'.repeat(1000) }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('a'.repeat(1000)); | |
| // Verify form submission with long text | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (2)
971-986: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd assertions for numeric format handling.
The test cases need assertions to verify the expected behavior:
it('handles floating point numbers for allottedHours', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1.5' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('1.5'); fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '0.001' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.001'); fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '99.999' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('99.999'); }); it('handles scientific notation for allottedHours', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e2' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('100'); fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '1e-2' } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('0.01'); });
1062-1078: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for past dates.
The test should verify that past dates are not accepted as valid due dates.
it('validates due date handling', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: 'invalid date' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); - fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2020' } }); - expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2020'); + // Test past date + const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + expect(screen.queryByText(/date must be in the future/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); }); });
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
912-937: Add boundary testing for text length limits.Consider adding test cases for:
- Maximum allowed length
- Length just above the maximum (if there is a limit)
- Empty string after a long input
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (5)
781-792: LGTM! Test case properly handles infinite values.The test case correctly verifies that both Infinity and -Infinity inputs are rejected and reset to empty string.
794-817: LGTM! Comprehensive validation of input restrictions.The test case thoroughly validates:
- Rejection of letter inputs
- Rejection of negative values
- Acceptance of valid positive numbers
819-834: Add validation for decimal and scientific notation edge cases.While the test covers basic edge cases, consider adding assertions for the following:
- Decimal numbers (e.g., 1.5, 0.001)
- Scientific notation (e.g., 1e2, 1e-2)
848-910: LGTM! Comprehensive text field validation.The test cases thoroughly validate:
- Empty string handling
- Whitespace-only string handling
- Special characters handling
- Form submission with various text inputs
939-969: LGTM! Proper handling of rapid form field changes.The test case effectively validates:
- Sequential value changes
- Persistence of final value
- Successful form submission after rapid changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (12)
781-792: Enhance infinite value test coverage.Consider adding tests for
Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY,Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY, and form submission behavior.it('handles infinite for allottedHours', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); // Test Infinity fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: Infinity } }); expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); // Test -Infinity fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: -Infinity } }); expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY and Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); + + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test form submission + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.invalidInput); + }); });
794-817: Add boundary value tests for allotted hours.Consider adding tests for decimal numbers, zero as a boundary case, and maximum allowed value.
it('should not allow letters or negative values in allotted hours', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); expect(allottedHours).toBeInTheDocument(); // Test letter input fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 'abc' } }); await waitFor(() => { expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); }); // Test negative value fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '-5' } }); await waitFor(() => { expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); }); + // Test decimal numbers + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '5.5' } }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('5.5'); + }); + + // Test zero as boundary + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '0' } }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('0'); + }); + + // Test maximum allowed value + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '999999' } }); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('999999'); + }); // Test valid positive number fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '5' } }); await waitFor(() => { expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('5'); }); });
819-834: Enhance edge cases test coverage.Consider adding tests for form submission behavior, boundary values, and floating-point precision.
it('validates allottedHours edge cases', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); // Test invalid string fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 'invalid' } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test NaN fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: NaN } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); // Test negative number fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: -5 } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test boundary values + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test floating-point precision + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: 0.1 + 0.2 } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue('0.3'); + + // Test form submission with invalid values + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.invalidInput); + }); });
848-860: Expand empty strings test coverage.Consider testing all form fields that accept empty strings and verify their state after submission.
it('handles empty strings in all text fields', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); + + const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '' } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '' } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); + // Verify field states after submission + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); }); });
862-884: Enhance whitespace handling test coverage.Consider testing various types of whitespace characters and their combinations.
it('handles whitespace-only strings', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); // Select Category 1 const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); // Select assignee const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); + // Test various whitespace combinations fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: ' ' } }); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(' '); + + // Test leading/trailing whitespace + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: ' test ' } }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(' test '); + + // Test multiple consecutive spaces + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: 'test test' } }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('test test'); + + // Test tab characters + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '\ttest\t' } }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('\ttest\t'); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); }); });
886-910: Enhance special characters test coverage.Consider testing Unicode characters, HTML entities, and SQL injection characters.
it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); // Select Category 1 const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); // Select assignee const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); + // Test basic special characters fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' }, }); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?'); + + // Test Unicode characters + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { + target: { value: '🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é' }, + }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é'); + + // Test HTML entities + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { + target: { value: '<script>alert("test")</script>' }, + }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('<script>alert("test")</script>'); + + // Test SQL injection characters + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { + target: { value: "'; DROP TABLE users; --" }, + }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue("'; DROP TABLE users; --"); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); }); });
912-937: Enhance long text input test coverage.Consider testing various lengths and content types for better coverage.
it('handles extremely long text input', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); // Select Category const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); // Select assignee const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); + // Test various lengths + const lengths = [100, 500, 1000, 5000]; + for (const length of lengths) { + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { + target: { value: 'a'.repeat(length) }, + }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('a'.repeat(length)); + } + + // Test with mixed content + const mixedContent = 'a'.repeat(500) + '123'.repeat(100) + '!@#'.repeat(100); fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { - target: { value: 'a'.repeat(1000) }, + target: { value: mixedContent }, }); - expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('a'.repeat(1000)); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(mixedContent); + + // Test performance with large input + console.time('Large Input Test'); + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { + target: { value: 'a'.repeat(10000) }, + }); + console.timeEnd('Large Input Test'); // Verify form submission with long text const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); }); });
939-969: Enhance rapid form field changes test coverage.Consider testing with different intervals and larger datasets.
it('handles rapid form field changes', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); // Required fields setup const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); const hoursInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); - const values = ['1', '2', '3', '4', '5']; + const values = Array.from({ length: 100 }, (_, i) => i.toString()); + // Test rapid changes with different intervals + const intervals = [0, 10, 50, 100]; // milliseconds + for (const interval of intervals) { + console.time(`Rapid Changes Test - ${interval}ms interval`); + for (const value of values) { + setTimeout(() => { + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value } }); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(value); + }, interval); + } + console.timeEnd(`Rapid Changes Test - ${interval}ms interval`); + } - values.forEach((value) => { - fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value } }); - expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(value); - }); // Verify final value persists await waitFor(() => { - expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('5'); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('99'); }); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); }); });
983-1000: Enhance empty and null values test coverage.Consider testing form submission and all form fields with empty, null, and undefined values.
it('handles empty and null form values correctly', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const allottedHours = screen.getByLabelText(t.allottedHours); const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); + const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); + // Test empty values fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '' } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + // Test null values fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: null } }); expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: null } }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); + + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: null } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test undefined values + fireEvent.change(allottedHours, { target: { value: undefined } }); + expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); + + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: undefined } }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); + + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: undefined } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test form submission with empty values + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.warning).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.requiredFields); + }); }); });
1002-1022: Enhance category selection test coverage.Consider testing invalid selections and multiple changes.
it('validates category selection', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); await waitFor(async () => { const categorySelect = await screen.findByTestId('categorySelect'); const inputField = within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox'); const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); expect(inputField).toBeRequired(); fireEvent.mouseDown(inputField); const categoryOption = await screen.findByText('Category 1'); fireEvent.click(categoryOption); expect(inputField).toHaveValue('Category 1'); + // Test invalid category selection + fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: 'Invalid Category' } }); + expect(inputField).toHaveValue('Invalid Category'); + expect(await screen.findByText(t.invalidCategory)).toBeInTheDocument(); + + // Test category deselection fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: '' } }); expect(inputField).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test multiple category changes + const categories = ['Category 1', 'Category 2']; + for (const category of categories) { + fireEvent.mouseDown(inputField); + const option = await screen.findByText(category); + fireEvent.click(option); + expect(inputField).toHaveValue(category); + } + + // Test form submission with invalid category + fireEvent.change(inputField, { target: { value: 'Invalid Category' } }); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.invalidCategory); + }); }); });
1024-1043: Enhance assignee type changes test coverage.Consider testing assignee selection and form submission after type changes.
it('handles assignee type changes correctly', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[1]); await waitFor(async () => { const groupRadio = await screen.findByText(t.groups); const individualRadio = await screen.findByText(t.individuals); fireEvent.click(individualRadio); expect(await screen.findByTestId('volunteerSelect')).toBeInTheDocument(); + + // Test individual assignee selection + const volunteerSelect = screen.getByTestId('volunteerSelect'); + fireEvent.mouseDown(within(volunteerSelect).getByRole('combobox')); + fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Teresa Bradley')); + expect(within(volunteerSelect).getByRole('combobox')).toHaveValue('Teresa Bradley'); fireEvent.click(groupRadio); expect( await screen.findByTestId('volunteerGroupSelect'), ).toBeInTheDocument(); + + // Test group assignee selection + const groupSelect = screen.getByTestId('volunteerGroupSelect'); + fireEvent.mouseDown(within(groupSelect).getByRole('combobox')); + fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('group1')); + expect(within(groupSelect).getByRole('combobox')).toHaveValue('group1'); fireEvent.click(individualRadio); expect(await screen.findByTestId('volunteerSelect')).toBeInTheDocument(); + + // Test invalid assignee selection + const newVolunteerSelect = screen.getByTestId('volunteerSelect'); + fireEvent.mouseDown(within(newVolunteerSelect).getByRole('combobox')); + fireEvent.change(within(newVolunteerSelect).getByRole('combobox'), { + target: { value: 'Invalid Volunteer' }, + }); + expect(await screen.findByText(t.invalidAssignee)).toBeInTheDocument(); + + // Test form submission after type change + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.invalidAssignee); + }); }); });
1045-1055: Enhance date handling test coverage.Consider testing invalid date formats and form submission with invalid dates.
it('handles null date change', async () => { renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); + + // Test null date fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: null } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + + // Test invalid date formats + const invalidDates = ['invalid', '13/13/2024', '2024-13-13']; + for (const date of invalidDates) { + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: date } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); + expect(screen.getByText(t.invalidDate)).toBeInTheDocument(); + } + + // Test past dates + const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); + expect(screen.getByText(t.pastDateError)).toBeInTheDocument(); + + // Test valid future date + const futureDate = '01/01/2025'; + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: futureDate } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(futureDate); + + // Test form submission with invalid date + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml** **Review profile: CHILL** **Plan: Pro** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3f3d0b638049647027c13493821a9c10098bbc9d and 47937e825a3d617648fd3a3521399a3baa40d8b3. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary> * `src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx` (3 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)</summary> * GitHub Check: Test Application </details> </details> <!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (5)
814-842: Add boundary test for maximum allowed value.While the test covers basic validation well, consider adding a test for values exceeding
Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGERto ensure proper handling of extremely large numbers.// Test maximum allowed value - fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '999999' } }); + // Test values exceeding MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: '9007199254740992' } }); await waitFor(() => { - expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue('999999'); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); });
935-971: Add validation for normalized whitespace.The test should verify if the component normalizes whitespace as expected (e.g., trimming leading/trailing spaces if required).
// Test various whitespace combinations fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: ' ' } }); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(' '); + + // Test whitespace normalization if required + const normalizedValue = ' test '; + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: normalizedValue } }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(normalizedValue.trim());
1033-1074: Add validation for performance with large inputs.The test should verify that the component remains responsive with large inputs.
// Test with long repeated words const longWords = Array(100) .fill('supercalifragilisticexpialidocious') .join(' '); fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: longWords }, }); + + // Verify component responsiveness + const start = performance.now(); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(longWords); + const end = performance.now(); + expect(end - start).toBeLessThan(100); // Should respond within 100ms
1157-1218: Add validation for form state after reset.The test should verify that the form state is properly reset after submission.
await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); // Verify optional fields remain empty after successful submission expect(allottedHours).toHaveValue(''); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(''); + + // Verify form state is reset + expect(screen.queryByText(/this field is required/i)).not.toBeInTheDocument(); });
1393-1415: Add validation for UTC date handling.The test should verify that dates are properly handled across different timezones.
// Test midnight boundary dates fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); + + // Test UTC date handling + const date = new Date('2025-01-01T00:00:00Z'); + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: date.toLocaleDateString() } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (4)
781-812: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for infinite value handling.The test case thoroughly validates the handling of infinite values in the allottedHours field, including both positive and negative infinity.
844-888: LGTM! Thorough edge case validation.The test case effectively covers various edge cases including invalid strings, NaN, negative numbers, and boundary values.
1076-1143: LGTM! Comprehensive test for rapid form field changes.The test effectively validates the component's behavior under rapid sequential changes and mixed value types.
902-933: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd validation for form submission with missing required fields.
The test should verify that the form cannot be submitted when required fields are empty.
// Submit form const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); fireEvent.click(submitButton); + + // Verify form submission is prevented + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.success).not.toHaveBeenCalled(); + expect(screen.getByText(/this field is required/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); + });Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| // for handling null change of date | ||
| it('handles date changes correctly', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| // First select required fields | ||
| const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); | ||
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); | ||
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); | ||
|
|
||
| const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); | ||
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); | ||
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); | ||
|
|
||
| const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test past date input | ||
| const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; | ||
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); | ||
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(pastDate); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test valid future date | ||
| const futureDate = '01/01/2025'; | ||
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: futureDate } }); | ||
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(futureDate); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test form submission with valid date | ||
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | ||
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | ||
| await waitFor(() => { | ||
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for invalid date formats.
The test should verify that the component properly handles invalid date formats.
const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate);
+
+ // Test invalid date formats
+ const invalidDates = ['13/01/2025', '01/32/2025', 'invalid'];
+ for (const date of invalidDates) {
+ fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: date } });
+ expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('');
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // for handling null change of date | |
| it('handles date changes correctly', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| // First select required fields | |
| const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); | |
| const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); | |
| const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); | |
| // Test past date input | |
| const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(pastDate); | |
| // Test valid future date | |
| const futureDate = '01/01/2025'; | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: futureDate } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(futureDate); | |
| // Test form submission with valid date | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| // for handling null change of date | |
| it('handles date changes correctly', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| // First select required fields | |
| const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); | |
| const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); | |
| const dateInput = screen.getByLabelText(t.dueDate); | |
| // Test invalid date formats | |
| const invalidDates = ['13/01/2025', '01/32/2025', 'invalid']; | |
| for (const date of invalidDates) { | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: date } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(''); | |
| } | |
| // Test past date input | |
| const pastDate = '01/01/2020'; | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: pastDate } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(pastDate); | |
| // Test valid future date | |
| const futureDate = '01/01/2025'; | |
| fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: futureDate } }); | |
| expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(futureDate); | |
| // Test form submission with valid date | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
MUI DatePicker doesn't handle invalid dates the way we're testing. When an invalid date is entered:
It doesn't clear the input (value='')
It maintains the last valid date value
It handles validation internally without exposing error messages directly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@yugal07 Thank you for the clarification about MUI DatePicker's behavior. You're absolutely right - I apologize for suggesting an incorrect test approach that doesn't match the actual component behavior.
🐰 thoughtfully taking notes about MUI DatePicker behavior
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: yugal07
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3417
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx:1320-1351
Timestamp: 2025-01-27T12:33:55.807Z
Learning: In MUI DatePicker component, invalid date inputs:
1. Don't clear the input field (value is not set to empty string)
2. Maintain the last valid date value
3. Handle validation internally without exposing error messages directly
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
| it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => { | ||
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | ||
|
|
||
| // Select Category 1 | ||
| const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); | ||
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); | ||
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); | ||
|
|
||
| // Select assignee | ||
| const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); | ||
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); | ||
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); | ||
|
|
||
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test basic special characters | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | ||
| target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' }, | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test Unicode characters including emojis and international characters | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | ||
| target: { value: '🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é è ü ö 한글 עברית العربية' }, | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | ||
| '🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é è ü ö 한글 עברית العربية', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test HTML-like content | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | ||
| target: { value: '<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>' }, | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | ||
| '<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test SQL-like characters and quotes | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | ||
| target: { value: '\'; DROP TABLE users; -- "quoted" text\'s test' }, | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | ||
| '\'; DROP TABLE users; -- "quoted" text\'s test', | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Test mathematical and currency symbols | ||
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | ||
| target: { value: '∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵' }, | ||
| }); | ||
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵'); | ||
|
|
||
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | ||
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | ||
| await waitFor(() => { | ||
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | ||
| // Verify the last special character value persists after submission | ||
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵'); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add validation for potential XSS and SQL injection patterns.
While the test covers special characters well, it should explicitly verify that the component safely handles potential security-related inputs.
// Test HTML-like content
fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, {
target: { value: '<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>' },
});
expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(
'<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>',
);
+
+ // Test common XSS patterns
+ const xssPatterns = [
+ '<img src="x" onerror="alert(1)">',
+ 'javascript:alert(1)',
+ '"><script>alert(1)</script>',
+ ];
+ for (const pattern of xssPatterns) {
+ fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: pattern } });
+ expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(pattern);
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| // Select Category 1 | |
| const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); | |
| // Select assignee | |
| const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| // Test basic special characters | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?'); | |
| // Test Unicode characters including emojis and international characters | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é è ü ö 한글 עברית العربية' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | |
| '🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é è ü ö 한글 עברית العربية', | |
| ); | |
| // Test HTML-like content | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | |
| '<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>', | |
| ); | |
| // Test SQL-like characters and quotes | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '\'; DROP TABLE users; -- "quoted" text\'s test' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | |
| '\'; DROP TABLE users; -- "quoted" text\'s test', | |
| ); | |
| // Test mathematical and currency symbols | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵'); | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| // Verify the last special character value persists after submission | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵'); | |
| }); | |
| }); | |
| it('handles special characters in text fields', async () => { | |
| renderItemModal(link1, itemProps[0]); | |
| // Select Category 1 | |
| const categorySelect = screen.getByTestId('categorySelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(categorySelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Category 1')); | |
| // Select assignee | |
| const memberSelect = screen.getByTestId('memberSelect'); | |
| fireEvent.mouseDown(within(memberSelect).getByRole('combobox')); | |
| fireEvent.click(await screen.findByText('Harve Lance')); | |
| const preCompletionNotes = screen.getByLabelText(t.preCompletionNotes); | |
| // Test basic special characters | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('!@#$%^&*()_+-=[]{}|;:,.<>?'); | |
| // Test Unicode characters including emojis and international characters | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é è ü ö 한글 עברית العربية' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | |
| '🚀 Unicode Test 你好 ñ é è ü ö 한글 עברית العربية', | |
| ); | |
| // Test HTML-like content | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | |
| '<div>Test</div> <script>alert("test")</script>', | |
| ); | |
| // Test common XSS patterns | |
| const xssPatterns = [ | |
| '<img src="x" onerror="alert(1)">', | |
| 'javascript:alert(1)', | |
| '"><script>alert(1)</script>', | |
| ]; | |
| for (const pattern of xssPatterns) { | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: pattern } }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(pattern); | |
| } | |
| // Test SQL-like characters and quotes | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '\'; DROP TABLE users; -- "quoted" text\'s test' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue( | |
| '\'; DROP TABLE users; -- "quoted" text\'s test', | |
| ); | |
| // Test mathematical and currency symbols | |
| fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { | |
| target: { value: '∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵' }, | |
| }); | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵'); | |
| const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); | |
| fireEvent.click(submitButton); | |
| await waitFor(() => { | |
| expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); | |
| // Verify the last special character value persists after submission | |
| expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue('∑ π ∆ ∞ € £ ¥ ₹ ± ≠ ≈ ∴ ∵'); | |
| }); | |
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (4)
781-812: Add assertions for form submission with infinite values.The test verifies that infinite values are rejected, but it should also verify the form submission behavior when these values are attempted.
// Test Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY and Number.NEGATIVE_INFINITY fireEvent.change(hoursInput, { target: { value: Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY }, }); expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); + + // Verify form submission behavior with infinite value + const submitButton = screen.getByTestId('submitBtn'); + fireEvent.click(submitButton); + await waitFor(() => { + expect(toast.success).toHaveBeenCalledWith(t.successfulCreation); + expect(hoursInput).toHaveValue(''); + });
844-869: Add validation for floating-point maximum values.While the test covers integer maximum values well, it should also verify handling of floating-point maximum values.
const testCases = [ { input: '9007199254740991', expected: '9007199254740991' }, // MAX_SAFE_INTEGER { input: '9007199254740992', expected: '9007199254740992' }, // MAX_SAFE_INTEGER + 1 + { input: '1.7976931348623157e+308', expected: '' }, // MAX_VALUE + { input: '2.2250738585072014e-308', expected: '' }, // MIN_VALUE ];
1060-1101: Add validation for content type boundaries.The test should verify that the component handles mixed content types (text + numbers + special chars) in long inputs.
// Test with long repeated words const longWords = Array(100) .fill('supercalifragilisticexpialidocious') .join(' '); fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { target: { value: longWords }, }); expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(longWords); + // Test mixed content types + const mixedContent = Array(100) + .fill('text123!@#') + .join(' '); + fireEvent.change(preCompletionNotes, { + target: { value: mixedContent }, + }); + expect(preCompletionNotes).toHaveValue(mixedContent);
1420-1442: Add validation for cross-timezone date handling.The test should verify that dates are handled correctly across different timezones.
// Test midnight boundary dates fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: '01/01/2025' } }); expect(dateInput).toHaveValue('01/01/2025'); + + // Test dates in different timezones + const timezones = ['UTC', 'America/New_York', 'Asia/Tokyo']; + for (const timezone of timezones) { + const date = new Date('2025-01-01T00:00:00Z'); + const localDate = new Intl.DateTimeFormat('en-US', { + timeZone: timezone, + }).format(date); + fireEvent.change(dateInput, { target: { value: localDate } }); + expect(dateInput).toHaveValue(localDate); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: yugal07
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#3417
File: src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx:1320-1351
Timestamp: 2025-01-27T12:33:55.957Z
Learning: In MUI DatePicker component, invalid date inputs:
1. Don't clear the input field (value is not set to empty string)
2. Maintain the last valid date value
3. Handle validation internally without exposing error messages directly
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ItemModal.spec.tsx (12)
814-842: LGTM! Comprehensive validation test.The test thoroughly validates the handling of letters, negative values, and boundary cases for the allotted hours field.
871-915: LGTM! Thorough edge case testing.The test comprehensively covers various edge cases including invalid strings, NaN, negative numbers, boundary values, and decimal handling.
929-960: LGTM! Proper empty string validation.The test effectively validates the handling of empty strings in all text fields and verifies form submission behavior.
962-998: LGTM! Comprehensive whitespace handling test.The test thoroughly validates various whitespace scenarios including leading/trailing spaces, multiple consecutive spaces, and tab characters.
1000-1058: Add validation for potential SQL injection patterns.While the test covers special characters well, it should explicitly verify SQL injection patterns.
1103-1170: LGTM! Thorough rapid input testing.The test effectively validates rapid sequential changes and mixed value handling.
1184-1245: LGTM! Comprehensive null handling.The test thoroughly validates handling of empty, null, and undefined values.
1247-1295: LGTM! Thorough category validation.The test effectively validates category selection, including required field validation and invalid inputs.
1297-1345: LGTM! Comprehensive assignee type testing.The test thoroughly validates assignee type changes and selection behavior.
1347-1378: Add validation for invalid date formats.The test should verify that the component properly handles invalid date formats.
1380-1418: LGTM! Comprehensive form state validation.The test effectively validates all form state changes and their interactions.
1464-1513: LGTM! Thorough security testing.The test comprehensively validates handling of potentially malicious input patterns.
|
@palisadoes, the remaining suggestions from Coderabbits are invalid because the application utilizes MUI components, which are highly versatile and support various input types. I have already implemented the valid suggestions, Let me know if there's need for further adjustments. |
|
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
BugFix
Issue Number:
Fixes #3368
Snapshots/Videos:
Before
kazam_a013c6a1.movie.mp4
After
kazam_a4a4jko8.movie.mp4
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
Added separate handling for allotted hours section, for non numeric values and negative values
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores