Refactored src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.test.tsx from jest to vitest #3355
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx (1)
27-32: Consider using type-safe mock implementation for react-toastify.The mock implementation is functionally correct for Vitest, but could benefit from type safety.
-vi.mock('react-toastify', () => ({ +vi.mock('react-toastify', () => ({ + __esModule: true, toast: { success: vi.fn(), error: vi.fn(), }, }));
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx (1)
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Test Application
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx (3)
46-46: LGTM! Correct migration of mock functions.The jest.fn() calls have been properly replaced with vi.fn() while maintaining the existing mock data structure.
Also applies to: 62-62, 70-70, 86-86
215-226: LGTM! Correct implementation of Vitest mocking patterns.The test suite setup correctly implements:
- Async mock implementation with vi.importActual
- Proper mock cleanup with vi.clearAllMocks
Line range hint
1-300: Verify complete removal of Jest references.Let's ensure no Jest-specific references remain in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Migration to Vitest is complete and correct
The codebase has been successfully migrated from Jest to Vitest:
- All assertions use Vitest-compatible matchers
- Test lifecycle methods are framework-agnostic
- No Jest-specific APIs or patterns remain
- Mocking is properly implemented using
vinamespace🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining Jest references in the test file # Expected: No occurrences of jest. except in comments # Search for jest references excluding comments and package.json rg 'jest\.' --type tsx --type ts --type jsx --type js \ --glob '!package.json' \ --glob '!**/jest.config.*' \ src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsxLength of output: 187
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for various Jest-specific patterns echo "=== Searching for Jest references ===" rg -i "jest\." src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx || true echo -e "\n=== Searching for Jest-specific expect matchers ===" rg "expect\((.*?)\)\.to(Be|Have|Match|Contain)" src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx || true echo -e "\n=== Searching for Jest lifecycle methods ===" rg "\b(beforeAll|afterAll|beforeEach|afterEach|describe|it|test)\b" src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx || true echo -e "\n=== Searching for Jest mock functions ===" rg "jest\.fn\(\)" src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.spec.tsx || trueLength of output: 2636
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3355 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 8.40% 89.75% +81.35%
=====================================================
Files 312 335 +23
Lines 8105 8612 +507
Branches 1801 1898 +97
=====================================================
+ Hits 681 7730 +7049
+ Misses 7347 627 -6720
- Partials 77 255 +178
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
on my local, all the test cases passes successfully, even this failing test. 
|
|
Please fix the failing test |
|
the failed test does not fail on my local system , and it was not altered during this PR. |
|
The PR that introduced the error has been reverted. Please merge with the latest upstream |
0185646
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #3347
Snapshots/Videos:
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
No
Summary
Migrated src/screens/UserPortal/Campaigns/PledgeModal.test.tsx from jest to vitest.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Other information
N/A
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit