-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 804
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/css #3084
Feat/css #3084
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
Use consistent color variables and improve accessibility
Based on the verification results, I found several potential contrast and accessibility issues in the codebase:
- Direct hex color usage without variables:
#1e293b
in Pledges.module.css#a5a5a5
in Chat.module.css#89898996
in EventCalendar.module.css#31bb6b
in YearlyEventCalender.module.css
- Inconsistent white color definitions:
#ffffff
var(--white-color)
var(--bs-white)
- Gray colors with potential contrast issues:
var(--gray-blue)
on light backgrounds#89898996
(semi-transparent gray) on white backgroundRecommendations:
- Define semantic color variables with proper contrast ratios
- Use CSS custom properties consistently instead of hex values
- Ensure text colors meet WCAG contrast guidelines (4.5:1 for normal text)
- Add visual indicators beyond just color for important UI elements
- Consider users with color vision deficiencies
Example fixes:
:root { /* Base colors with proper contrast ratios */ --color-gray-600: #4B5563; /* For better contrast on white */ --color-primary: #2563EB; --color-white: #FFFFFF; } /* Use semantic variables */ .text { color: var(--color-gray-600); background: var(--color-white); } /* Add non-color indicators */ .status { color: var(--color-primary); &::before { content: "●"; margin-right: 0.5rem; } }🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
100-4120
: Address accessibility and consistency in component stylesSeveral accessibility and maintainability issues were found in the component styles:
- Inconsistent color usage (mixing variables and hardcoded values)
- Missing hover/focus states for interactive elements
- Potential contrast issues
- Color-only indicators lacking alternative visual cues
Consider these improvements:
- Use semantic color variables consistently:
.errorIcon { - color: var(--bs-danger, var(--delete-button-color)); + color: var(--color-error, var(--color-red-500)); }
- Add focus states for interactive elements:
.cardActionBtn:focus-visible { + outline: 2px solid var(--color-primary); + outline-offset: 2px; }
- Add non-color indicators:
.errorIcon { color: var(--color-error); + /* Add error icon for non-color indication */ + &::before { + content: '⚠️'; + margin-right: 0.5rem; + } }Let's verify potential contrast issues with the following script:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find potential contrast issues in color combinations # Look for background/color pairs that might have contrast issues rg -A 1 'background-color:.*(?:white|#fff|var\(--white)' | rg 'color:.*(?:grey|gray|#[A-Fa-f0-9]{6})'Length of output: 1044
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
Line range hint
1-4120
: Consider adding dark mode supportSince the changes aim to facilitate a toggle background feature, consider implementing a comprehensive dark mode:
- Add dark mode variables
- Use CSS custom properties with light/dark variants
- Support system preference with
prefers-color-scheme
Example implementation:
/* Add to :root */ :root { /* Light mode (default) */ --color-bg: var(--color-white); --color-text: var(--color-black); /* Dark mode */ @media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) { --color-bg: var(--color-gray-900); --color-text: var(--color-white); } } /* Add class-based override */ :root[data-theme="dark"] { --color-bg: var(--color-gray-900); --color-text: var(--color-white); }
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3084 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 26.46% 88.94% +62.47%
=====================================================
Files 300 321 +21
Lines 7568 8409 +841
Branches 1652 1894 +242
=====================================================
+ Hits 2003 7479 +5476
+ Misses 5434 688 -4746
- Partials 131 242 +111 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@palisadoes LGTM !! |
9f4bda0
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
* gg * hh * refreshed
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
it is a feature that changes hard coded color to color using variable in src/style/app.module.css
Issue Number:
2985
Fixes #2985
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
NO
Summary
basically we want a toggle background feature for that use of varible color in css is important
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
nothing
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit