Write Unittests for src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.tsx (fixes : #2366) #2975

amaan-aly246 · 2024-12-27T17:17:42Z

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Migration of unit test written in jest to vitest.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2366

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes
- Improved test execution efficiency by removing unnecessary waits and imports.
New Features
- Added a new test case for creating a new agenda item, including user interaction scenarios.

coderabbitai · 2024-12-27T17:17:49Z

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the EventAgendaItems.spec.tsx test file, transitioning from Jest to Vitest testing framework. The modifications include streamlining imports, removing unnecessary await wait() calls, and simplifying test case control flow. A new test case for creating an agenda item has been added, demonstrating user interactions for form filling and category selection.

Changes

File	Change Summary
`src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.spec.tsx`	- Removed unnecessary imports - Eliminated redundant `await wait()` calls - Simplified `vi` import statement - Added new test case for creating agenda item

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
100% Coverage for `EventAgendaItems.tsx` [#2366]	❓	Partial progress; need to verify complete coverage
Maintain existing functionality	✅	No functionality appears to be removed
CodeRabbit approval	❓	Requires CodeRabbit review

Possibly related issues

Refactor: src/screens/EventManagement from Jest to Vitest #2546: Refactoring src/screens/EventManagement from Jest to Vitest - shares similar migration goals
Refactor : src/components/AgendaItems/AgendaItemsPreviewModal.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2490: Refactoring AgendaItemsPreviewModal.test.tsx to Vitest - similar testing component migration

Possibly related PRs

Migrated src/components/EventManagement/* from Jest to Vitest #2915: Direct migration of EventAgendaItems.spec.tsx to Vitest
Refactor: Vitest to src/components/EventCalendar/* #2944: Updates to EventCalendar component tests using Vitest
Refactor : Vitest to src/components/MemberDetail/* #2945: Transition of MemberDetail component tests to Vitest

Suggested reviewers

palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, testing we go!
From Jest to Vitest, watch our code flow
Imports trimmed, calls simplified
Agenda items now testify
A rabbit's leap of testing delight! 🧪

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
- Generate unit testing code for this file.
- Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

@coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
@coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
@coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
@coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
@coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
@coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
@coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
@coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
@coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

github-actions · 2024-12-27T17:18:07Z

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

comments in this PR or
our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.spec.tsx (1)

Line range hint 154-208: Consider re-enabling the commented-out toast assertion to validate user feedback.

The test accurately simulates user interaction but leaves the success toast assertion commented out. Re-enabling and verifying the toast message would bolster this test’s thoroughness. For instance, you can rely on Vitest’s mock calls to confirm that toast.success is invoked properly.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 43f2c61 and 96ab977.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.spec.tsx (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.spec.tsx (1)

21-21: Good use of Vitest's mocking utilities.

Switching from Jest to Vitest while maintaining a similar top-level mocking approach looks clean. Ensure you remove any leftover Jest-specific imports or calls throughout the file to avoid conflicts.

codecov · 2024-12-27T17:28:44Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.92%. Comparing base (81c66d9) to head (e463dc4).
Report is 57 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2975       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             29.27%   88.92%   +59.65%     
=====================================================
  Files                   300      321       +21     
  Lines                  7546     8408      +862     
  Branches               1646     1835      +189     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   2209     7477     +5268     
+ Misses                 5154      688     -4466     
- Partials                183      243       +60

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

palisadoes

According to the CodeCov report, the coverage hasn't changed.

https://app.codecov.io/gh/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/pull/2975?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=PalisadoesFoundation

You have removed code, not added to the testing. When updating pleas post a screen shot of the code coverage report. It needs to get to 100% without ignore statements

palisadoes · 2024-12-27T20:15:18Z

There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.

amaan-aly246 · 2024-12-28T07:19:43Z

There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready.

@palisadoes You did assign this to me. If possible, I would be happy to continue working on this development.

palisadoes · 2024-12-28T15:22:33Z

I'm sorry.

palisadoes · 2024-12-28T15:23:18Z

Reopening. I lost track.

amaan-aly246 · 2024-12-28T20:01:56Z

@palisadoes I'm unable to identify additional test cases for this component. If you could suggest areas or scenarios to focus on, I would really appreciate it.
Thanks.

palisadoes · 2024-12-28T22:06:42Z

@noman2002 PTAL

amaan-aly246 · 2025-01-01T01:44:36Z

@noman2002 Hi, Did you find any area for new testcases ?

EventAgendaItems migrated from jest to vitest.

96ab977

coderabbitai bot reviewed Dec 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

coderabbitai bot approved these changes Dec 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

palisadoes requested changes Dec 27, 2024

View reviewed changes

palisadoes closed this Dec 27, 2024

palisadoes reopened this Dec 28, 2024

Merge branch 'develop-postgres' into EventAgendaItems_unit-test

e463dc4

palisadoes requested review from palisadoes and noman2002 December 28, 2024 22:06

palisadoes approved these changes Jan 3, 2025

View reviewed changes

palisadoes merged commit 6e3435b into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 3, 2025
15 checks passed

amaan-aly246 deleted the EventAgendaItems_unit-test branch January 3, 2025 17:02

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 14, 2025

Updated the CONTRIBUTING.md Testing section to cover jest and vitest #3277

Merged

6 tasks

coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2025

Refactored src/components/GroupChatDetails from jest to vitest #3453

Merged

6 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Write Unittests for src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.tsx (fixes : #2366) #2975

Write Unittests for src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.tsx (fixes : #2366) #2975

amaan-aly246 commented Dec 27, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Dec 27, 2024

coderabbitai bot left a comment

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

palisadoes left a comment

palisadoes commented Dec 27, 2024

amaan-aly246 commented Dec 28, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 28, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 28, 2024

amaan-aly246 commented Dec 28, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 28, 2024

amaan-aly246 commented Jan 1, 2025

Write Unittests for src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.tsx (fixes : #2366) #2975

Write Unittests for src/components/EventManagement/EventAgendaItems/EventAgendaItems.tsx (fixes : #2366) #2975

Conversation

amaan-aly246 commented Dec 27, 2024 • edited by coderabbitai bot Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Walkthrough

Changes

Assessment against linked issues

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

Poem

Chat

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

Other keywords and placeholders

Documentation and Community

github-actions bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Testing Your Code

Reviewers

Reviewing Your Code

CONTRIBUTING.md

Other

coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

palisadoes commented Dec 27, 2024

amaan-aly246 commented Dec 28, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 28, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 28, 2024

amaan-aly246 commented Dec 28, 2024

palisadoes commented Dec 28, 2024

amaan-aly246 commented Jan 1, 2025

amaan-aly246 commented Dec 27, 2024 •

edited by coderabbitai bot

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Dec 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading