Refactor CSS files in src/screens/OrgContribution (Fixs : #2520) #2674
Conversation
…onding css file code into global css file (app.module.css)
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring CSS files for the Organization Contribution screen and related components. The changes involve merging CSS styles from multiple component-specific CSS files into the global Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
package.json (2)
Update @apollo/client from beta version ^3.4.0-beta.19 to the latest stable version 3.12.3
Using a beta version in production dependencies poses stability risks. The latest stable version 3.12.3 is recommended for production use.
- Update the dependency in package.json:
- "@apollo/client": "^3.4.0-beta.19", + "@apollo/client": "^3.12.3",🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
163-163: Caution: Using beta version of @apollo/client in resolutionsUsing a beta version (
^3.4.0-beta.19) of @apollo/client in production could introduce instability. Consider using the latest stable version instead.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check latest stable version of @apollo/client curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@apollo/client | jq -r '."dist-tags".latest'Length of output: 88
Version mismatch between @types/react and React needs to be addressed
The verification confirms that:
- React 18.3.1 is being used in the project
- React 18 features like
createRootare actively being used- Multiple components use React.FC/FunctionComponent types
- @types/react is pinned to version 17.0.2
This version mismatch between React 18.3.1 and @types/react 17.0.2 needs to be resolved by updating @types/react to a compatible version (18.x.x) to ensure type definitions match the actual React implementation.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
164-164: Version mismatch: @types/react vs ReactThe project uses React 18.3.1 but @types/react is pinned to 17.0.2. This version mismatch could lead to incorrect type definitions and development issues.
Let me gather more information about the React version actually being used in the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for React 18 type usage that might break with React 17 types rg -l "React\.(FC|FunctionComponent)<" # Check if any files use React 18 specific features ast-grep --pattern 'useTransition|useDeferredValue|useId|useInsertionEffect|useSyncExternalStore'Length of output: 2707
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check React version in package.json cat package.json | jq '.dependencies.react, .devDependencies.react' # Check for any React 18 specific imports rg "createRoot|useTransition|useDeferredValue|useId|useInsertionEffect|useSyncExternalStore" -A 2Length of output: 542
src/style/app.module.css (1)
Line range hint
388-394: Duplicate CSS class definitions for.orgUserTagsScrollableDivThe
.orgUserTagsScrollableDivclass is defined twice in the stylesheet (lines 388-394 and lines 419-425). This can lead to confusion and unexpected behavior due to overlapping styles. Please consolidate these definitions into a single definition to maintain clarity and prevent potential conflicts.Also applies to: 419-425
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.tsx (2)
11-15: Update JSDoc to match new component nameThe JSDoc comment still references the old component name
orgContributionwhile the component has been renamed toOrgContribution./** - * The `orgContribution` component displays the contributions to an organization. + * The `OrgContribution` component displays the contributions to an organization. * It includes a sidebar for filtering contributions by organization name and transaction ID. * Additionally, it shows recent contribution statistics and a list of contribution cards. */
Line range hint
49-55: Consider removing hardcoded values from componentsThe
ContriStatsandOrgContriCardscomponents contain hardcoded values which might be test data. Consider replacing these with actual data from props or a data source.<ContriStats - key="129" - id="21" - recentAmount="90" - highestAmount="500" - totalAmount="6000" + key={someUniqueKey} + id={contributionId} + recentAmount={recentAmount} + highestAmount={highestAmount} + totalAmount={totalAmount} /> <OrgContriCards - key="129" - id="21" - userName="John Doe" - contriDate="20/7/2021" - contriAmount="21" - contriTransactionId="21WE98YU" - userEmail="johndoexyz@gmail.com" + key={someUniqueKey} + id={contributionId} + userName={userName} + contriDate={contriDate} + contriAmount={contriAmount} + contriTransactionId={transactionId} + userEmail={userEmail} />Also applies to: 69-77
src/style/app.module.css (2)
432-440: Remove commented-out codeThere is a block of commented-out CSS code between lines 432-440. Keeping unused code can clutter the stylesheet and make maintenance more difficult. If this code is no longer needed, please remove it to keep the codebase clean.
73-109: Ensure consistent naming conventions for CSS classesThe class names in the stylesheet use a mix of camelCase and kebab-case (e.g.,
.sidebarsticky,.logintitle,.searchtitle,.admindetails). For improved readability and maintainability, consider using a consistent naming convention throughout the stylesheet, such as kebab-case (.sidebar-sticky,.login-title).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
package.json(1 hunks)src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.module.css(0 hunks)src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.tsx(2 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(11 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.module.css
- src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.module.css
- src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/OrgContriCards/OrgContriCards.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.tsx (2)
Line range hint 16-85: Implementation follows React best practices
The component implementation is well-structured with:
- Proper TypeScript typing
- Accessible form controls
- Internationalization support
- Clear component structure
8-8: Verify CSS class migration to global stylesheet
The CSS import has been moved to the global stylesheet. Let's ensure all required styles are properly migrated.
✅ Verification successful
Let me fix the regex issue and try again to verify the CSS classes.
CSS classes are properly migrated to global stylesheet
All CSS classes used in OrgContribution.tsx (justifysp, logintitle, mainpageright, searchtitle, sidebar, sidebarsticky) are present in the global stylesheet at src/style/app.module.css. The import path and CSS migration are correct.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all CSS classes used in this component exist in the global stylesheet
# Get all CSS classes used in this file
echo "CSS classes used in OrgContribution.tsx:"
rg "styles\.[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+" "src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.tsx" -o | sort -u | sed 's/styles\.//'
# Check if these classes exist in the global stylesheet
echo -e "\nChecking if these classes exist in global stylesheet:"
rg "^\.([a-zA-Z0-9_-]+)\s*{" "src/style/app.module.css" -o | sed 's/^\.//' | sort -u
Length of output: 589
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all CSS classes used in this component exist in the global stylesheet
# Get all CSS classes used in this file
echo "CSS classes used in OrgContribution.tsx:"
rg "styles\.[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+" "src/screens/OrgContribution/OrgContribution.tsx" -o | sort -u | sed 's/styles\.//'
# Check if these classes exist in global stylesheet
echo -e "\nChecking if these classes exist in global stylesheet:"
rg "^\.[a-zA-Z0-9_-]+" "src/style/app.module.css" -o | sed 's/^\.//' | sort -u
Length of output: 1077
package.json (2)
159-159: LGTM: Minor version bump for vitest
The update from ^2.1.5 to ^2.1.8 is a patch version change that should be safe.
Line range hint 169-171: Verify Node.js version requirement impact
The addition of "node": ">=20.x" is quite restrictive. Ensure this aligns with your CI/CD environment and development team requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Node.js version requirements.
Node.js 20 requirement is justified and properly aligned
The Node.js 20.x requirement is well-aligned with the project's infrastructure and dependencies:
- The Dockerfile explicitly uses
node:20.10.0as the base image - Several dependencies in package.json are using recent versions that benefit from Node.js 20's features and improvements:
- React 18.3.x and related ecosystem
- Vite 5.4.x
- TypeScript 5.6.x
- Modern testing libraries and tooling
The codebase shows a modern JavaScript/TypeScript setup that would benefit from Node.js 20's performance improvements and features. No compatibility issues were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if CI configuration specifies Node.js version
fd -t f "^\.?github/workflows/.*\.(ya?ml|json)$" | xargs rg "node-version"
# Check for Node.js version specific features in the codebase
rg "node:" # Search for Node.js protocol imports
ast-grep --pattern 'fetch($$$)' # Search for native fetch usage (Node.js 18+ feature)
Length of output: 12257
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for dependencies that might require Node.js 20
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies'
# Check for usage of Node.js 20 specific features
rg "import.meta" # Node.js 20 feature
rg "structuredClone" # Node.js 17+ feature
rg "Object\.hasOwn" # Node.js 16.9+ feature
# Check Dockerfile for any other Node.js version references
cat Dockerfile
Length of output: 4618
src/components/ContriStats/ContriStats.tsx (3)
4-4: Updated import to centralized stylesheet
Importing styles from app.module.css centralizes styling and promotes consistency across components.
16-18: Enhanced JSDoc comments for parameters
Providing detailed descriptions for each parameter in the JSDoc comments improves documentation and helps other developers understand the code more easily.
22-26: Destructured props in function declaration
Destructuring props directly in the function parameters simplifies the code and enhances readability.
|
@amaan-aly246 Please fix the failed tests. |
|
currently working on resolving the 3rd failed test. |
|
…repo on the schema.graphql file'
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2674 +/- ##
====================================================
- Coverage 92.23% 83.91% -8.33%
====================================================
Files 295 312 +17
Lines 7036 8128 +1092
Branches 1516 1778 +262
====================================================
+ Hits 6490 6821 +331
- Misses 342 1162 +820
+ Partials 204 145 -59 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes, I need help solving the failing test. I know a bit of GraphQL but am unable to resolve this error: I looked at the schema.graphql and FundMutation.ts files but couldn't find any issue in the schema and code is working fine on my end without any errors. |
395fbc0
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
|
The introspection tests will be fixed in a few weeks. |
|
@palisadoes I want to contribute more to this org. I have 2-3 question if you (or any maintainer) can answer
Thanks, looking forward to contribute more. |
|
@amaan-aly246 I cannot answer #2, but you can find the link to our slack channel on our main github page for Palisadoes Foundation. We do hope to participate in GSoC 2025 as a mentoring organization. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactor
Issue Number:
Fixes #2520
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not relevant
Summary
The goal is to convert the CSS file in this subdirectory and all the components related to this screen to use this new design pattern.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style
Refactor
ContriStatscomponent for better readability.orgContributioncomponent toOrgContributionfor consistency with naming conventions.