Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable ERC-1271 signature checks in Governor
castVoteBySig
#4418Enable ERC-1271 signature checks in Governor
castVoteBySig
#4418Changes from 4 commits
f95789f
3c74d60
351450b
01cbd6c
c0fab29
89ba1a4
3b9dcd2
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not merge the two changesets into one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just thought both required their own entry. Although the main reason of this PR is to introduce 1271 compatibility, it requires this change that should be communicated on its own.
We can think of an individual changeset if you think it's needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My intuition is that all of the changes to
castVoteBySig
should be together in the same changeset, including also #4378 currently in.changeset/sixty-numbers-reply.md
.If not that, I do think we should at least merge the 2 in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer merging these two into a single one because otherwise, we'll be breaking the PR reference when processing the changesets into the changelog.
Not sure if all the changes should be in a single entry. But I'd be worried about the order in the Changelog once they get processed.